accelint-qrspi-propose
Automate the QRSPI + OpenSpec planning workflow (Questions → Research → Design → Structure) for spec-driven development. Use this skill when the user wants to plan a ticket, start a QRSPI workflow, create a change with QRSPI, or says "plan this with QRSPI", "use QRSPI to plan", "start QRSPI workflow", "create spec-driven change", or asks about planning a feature/change before implementation. This skill handles ONLY the planning phase — it does NOT implement code. After completion, the user continues with /opsx:apply for implementation.
What this skill does
# Accelint QRSPI
Automate the QRSPI + OpenSpec planning workflow, implementing the methodology from "We Got RPI Wrong" with OpenSpec's artifact system. This skill orchestrates the Question generation → Research → Design → Structure phases, with mandatory human checkpoints before code is written.
## What This Skill Does
**Automates**: The planning phase of spec-driven development using QRSPI methodology
**Scope**: Questions → Research → Design → Structure/Plan (stops before implementation)
**Output**: A complete OpenSpec change ready for `/opsx:apply`
**Does NOT**: Implement code, run tests, create PRs, or archive changes
## Prerequisites
This skill requires the **expanded OpenSpec workflows** (`explore`, `new`, `continue`) to access the step-by-step artifact generation.
To verify these workflows are enabled:
```bash
openspec config list
```
Check that the `workflows:` section includes: `explore`, `new`, and `continue`.
If any are missing, enable the expanded profile:
```bash
openspec config profile
# Select "expanded" from the list
openspec update
```
## Workflow Overview
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase Context Output Checkpoint │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Questions Ticket only Questions — │
│ Research Questions only Research doc — │
│ Design Q+R (NO ticket) proposal.md — │
│ design.md — │
│ [STOP HERE] │
│ ⚠️ CHECKPOINT 1: Review design.md - MUST approve to continue │
│ │
│ Specs/Tasks Q+R+design specs/* — │
│ tasks.md — │
│ ⚠️ CHECKPOINT 2: Review tasks.md - MUST approve to continue │
│ │
│ Done — Exit — │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Note: Ticket is kept OUT of context after Phase 1 to prevent completion bleed.
Critical: Phase 3 generates ONLY proposal.md and design.md, then STOPS for review.
Phase 5 generates specs/* and tasks.md separately after design approval.
⚠️ MANDATORY CHECKPOINTS: The agent MUST pause and wait for explicit user approval
at both checkpoints. Proceeding without approval bypasses QRSPI's core value.
```
## Phase Breakdown
### Phase 0: Preflight Checks
Before starting, verify the user provided input and OpenSpec has the required workflows enabled.
**Steps**:
1. **Validate user input**: Check if the user provided a ticket, feature request, or idea in their prompt (either as skill arguments or in their message). If the prompt is empty or contains only the skill invocation with no actual content:
```
I need a ticket or feature description to plan. Please provide:
- A ticket ID and description (e.g., "ATI-123: Add user authentication...")
- A feature request ("I want to add dark mode support...")
- An idea or problem statement ("Users complain about slow search...")
Then I'll use QRSPI to break it down into a structured plan.
```
Exit the skill and wait for the user to provide input. Do NOT proceed with internal examples or placeholder content.
2. Tell the user: "Checking OpenSpec configuration..."
3. Run `openspec config list` and parse the output
4. Check if the `workflows:` section contains all three required workflows: `explore`, `new`, and `continue`
5. If any are missing:
```
This skill requires the expanded OpenSpec workflows (explore, new, continue).
Your current workflows: [list what's enabled]
Missing: [list what's missing]
To enable the expanded workflows, run:
openspec config profile
# Select "expanded" from the list
openspec update
Then re-run this skill.
```
6. Exit the skill if required workflows are not enabled
7. If validation passes and all workflows are present, proceed to Phase 1
### Phase 1: Questions (Ticket Context → Questions)
**Goal**: Generate research questions from the ticket, without proposing solutions.
**Context isolation**: The agent generating questions should see ONLY the ticket, not prior codebase knowledge or research. This prevents solution-first thinking.
**Steps**:
1. Accept the ticket description from the user (passed as the skill argument or prompted if missing)
2. Spawn a sub-agent with this exact prompt:
```
/opsx:explore
I have this ticket:
[paste full ticket description here]
Generate a list of research questions that will tell us everything we need
to know before building this. Do not propose any solutions. Questions only.
```
3. Wait for the sub-agent to complete and return the questions
4. Extract and store the questions — they will be passed to the next phase
**Output**: A structured list of research questions (no answers yet)
### Phase 2: Research (Questions Only → Research Doc)
**Goal**: Answer the questions with objective facts from the codebase, without the ticket bleeding into research.
**Context isolation**: The agent answering questions should see ONLY the questions, not the original ticket. This is the core QRSPI insight — research is objective, ticket-agnostic.
**Steps**:
1. Spawn a NEW sub-agent (fresh context) with this exact prompt:
```
/opsx:explore
[paste ONLY the research questions from Phase 1]
Answer each question with facts only. Observe what the codebase does today.
Do not suggest changes or implementation approaches.
```
2. Wait for the sub-agent to complete and return the research document
3. Store the research answers — they will inform the design phase
**Output**: A research document with objective answers to all questions
### Phase 3: Design Scaffolding
**Goal**: Create the OpenSpec change and generate proposal.md and design.md artifacts.
**Context isolation**: The ticket should NOT be in context during artifact generation to prevent "completion bleed". Spawn a sub-agent with only questions + research.
**Steps**:
1. Read `openspec/config.yaml` to extract the `rules.design` section
2. Read `CLAUDE.md` or `AGENTS.md` to extract agent behavior context
3. Spawn a sub-agent with this exact prompt:
```
You are generating OpenSpec artifacts based on QRSPI research. You have access
to the research questions and answers, but NOT the original ticket text. This
prevents solution bias.
Research Questions and Answers:
[paste questions from Phase 1]
Research Findings:
[paste research doc from Phase 2]
OpenSpec Design Rules (from config.yaml):
[paste the rules.design section verbatim]
Agent Behavior Context:
[paste relevant sections from CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md]
CRITICAL: You MUST use /opsx commands to create and generate artifacts.
DO NOT create files or write artifact content yourself. The /opsx commands
will handle artifact generation following OpenSpec's configured rules.
Now create the OpenSpec change with proposal and design artifacts:
1. Run /opsx:new to create the change (OpenSpec will prompt for a slug)
2. CRITICAL: Capture the change name/slug from the output and use it in all subsequent commands
3. Run /opsx:continue <change-name> ONCE to generate proposal.md ONLY
4. Run /opsx:continue <change-name> ONCE to generate design.md ONLY
5. STOP after design.md - do NOT generate specs or tasks yet
IMPORTANT: Let /opsx:continue generate proposal.md and design.md using the
OpenSpec workflow. DO NOT write these files yourself. The /opsx:continue
command handles artifact generation based on config.yaml rules.
After design.md is generated (and ONLY proposal.md and design.md exist),
report completion, the CHANGE NAME, and the path to the Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.