advanced-skill-creator
Meta-skill that generates domain-specific skills using advanced reasoning techniques. PROACTIVELY activate for: (1) Create/build/make skills, (2) Generate expert panels for any domain, (3) Design evaluation frameworks, (4) Create research workflows, (5) Structure complex multi-step processes, (6) Instantiate templates with parameters. Triggers: "create a skill for", "build evaluation for", "design workflow for", "generate expert panel for", "how should I approach [complex task]", "create skill", "new skill for", "skill template", "generate skill"
What this skill does
# Advanced Skill Creator
Generate domain-specific skills and workflows using advanced reasoning techniques.
## Purpose
This meta-skill orchestrates skill generation by:
1. Analyzing task requirements
2. Selecting appropriate patterns from the library
3. Instantiating templates with domain parameters
4. Generating executable SKILL.md files or portable prompts
## Core Libraries
This skill has access to (load on demand):
- `@core/technique-taxonomy.yaml` — 200+ techniques across 6 cognitive categories
- `@core/artifact-contracts.yaml` — Standardized I/O schemas
- `@core/scoring-rubrics.yaml` — Pluggable evaluation algorithms
- `@core/skill-patterns.yaml` — Parameterized workflow patterns
- `@core/checkpoint-patterns.yaml` — AskUserQuestion checkpoint patterns
## Checkpoints
This skill uses interactive checkpoints (see `references/checkpoints.yaml`) to resolve ambiguity:
- **task_type_classification** — When request matches multiple patterns
- **domain_selection** — When domain not specified
- **stakeholder_selection** — When multiple stakeholder types could apply
- **preset_conflict** — When user params conflict with presets
- **anti_pattern_composition** — When composition matches known anti-pattern
- **output_mode** — When output format not specified
- **plugin_routing** — When skill could belong to multiple plugins
## Available Templates
| Template | Use Case | Key Parameters |
|----------|----------|----------------|
| `expert-panel` | Multi-perspective evaluation | domain, panel_size, goal |
| `tournament-ranking` | Pairwise comparison | items, criteria, algorithm |
| `adversarial-validation` | Red/blue team analysis | proposition, attack_vectors |
| `research-brief` | Multi-LLM research design | domain, models, depth |
| `gap-audit` | Completeness assessment | document, standards |
| `jtbd-extraction` | Job story generation | features, persona |
| `user-flow-mapping` | Journey documentation | process, touchpoints |
| `feature-extraction` | Identify features | context, granularity |
| `diataxis-documentation` | Generate docs | doc_type, audience |
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Requirements Analysis
When asked to create a skill or workflow:
1. **Identify the core task type:**
- Evaluation/Comparison → Use MOE-EVALUATE or TOURNAMENT patterns
- Generation/Ideation → Use MOE-GENERATE pattern
- Validation/Testing → Use ADVERSARIAL-VALIDATE pattern
- Research/Discovery → Use RESEARCH-SYNTHESIZE pattern
- Documentation → Use DIATAXIS pattern
- Extraction → Use ELICIT-EXTRACT pattern
2. **CHECKPOINT: task_type_classification**
- If request matches multiple patterns (confidence < 0.7): **AskUserQuestion**
- Present top 2-3 matching patterns with descriptions
- Example: "Should this skill evaluate existing options or generate new ones?"
3. **Determine parameters needed:**
- Domain/context
- Stakeholders
- Quality dimensions
- Output format
4. **CHECKPOINT: domain_selection**
- If domain not specified and not inferable: **AskUserQuestion**
- Options: Architecture, Product, Strategy, Research, Custom
- Example: "What domain is this skill for?"
5. **Check for existing skills that might compose:**
- Can we chain existing skills?
- What's missing that requires new skill?
### Phase 2: Pattern Selection
Load `@core/skill-patterns.yaml` and select pattern based on:
| Task Type | Pattern | When to Use |
|-----------|---------|-------------|
| Compare options | MOE-EVALUATE | 2-8 options, need expert perspectives |
| Rank many items | TOURNAMENT-RANK | >5 items, need statistical ranking |
| Generate ideas | MOE-GENERATE | Need diverse, expert-informed ideas |
| Stress-test decision | ADVERSARIAL-VALIDATE | High-stakes, need to find weaknesses |
| Synthesize research | RESEARCH-SYNTHESIZE | Multiple sources to reconcile |
| Check completeness | GAP-AUDIT | Document against standards |
| Extract requirements | ELICIT-EXTRACT | Unstructured → structured |
### Phase 3: Template Instantiation
Based on selected pattern, configure template:
```yaml
skill_instantiation:
pattern: "[selected pattern]"
domain: "[user's domain]"
parameters:
# Pattern-specific parameters
techniques:
# Selected from technique-taxonomy
output_contract:
# From artifact-contracts
```
1. **CHECKPOINT: preset_conflict**
- If user params conflict with domain preset: **AskUserQuestion**
- Example: "You specified 6 experts, but 'product' preset uses 4. Which should we use?"
2. **CHECKPOINT: anti_pattern_composition**
- If composition matches anti-pattern: **AskUserQuestion**
- Warn about the issue and offer alternatives
- Example: "Chaining ADVERSARIAL-VALIDATE → ADVERSARIAL-VALIDATE creates infinite loops"
### Phase 4: Output Generation
1. **CHECKPOINT: output_mode**
- If output format not specified: **AskUserQuestion**
- Options: Executable SKILL.md, Portable prompt, Both
- Example: "Should this be an executable skill or a portable prompt?"
Generate one of:
**A. Executable Skill (SKILL.md)**
- Complete frontmatter with triggers
- Full workflow instructions
- Quality gates
- Output templates
**B. Portable Prompt**
- Standalone prompt for other contexts
- Self-contained instructions
- No skill dependencies
**→ Proceed to Phase 5 to save the skill in the correct location.**
### Phase 5: Skill Placement
Generated skills MUST be placed in the correct plugin directory for marketplace visibility:
1. **Determine target plugin based on skill type:**
| Skill Type | Target Plugin |
|------------|---------------|
| Evaluation/Comparison | `evaluation-tools` |
| Research/Discovery | `research-tools` |
| Documentation | `documentation-tools` |
| Prompt optimization | `prompt-tools` |
| Skill generation/Meta | `meta-tools` |
2. **CHECKPOINT: plugin_routing**
- If skill matches criteria for 2+ plugins: **AskUserQuestion**
- Example: "This skill audits documentation. Should it go in evaluation-tools or documentation-tools?"
3. **Create the skill directory structure:**
```
plugins/<target-plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/
├── SKILL.md ← Main skill definition (required)
├── references/ ← Supporting reference docs (optional)
└── templates/ ← Output templates (optional)
```
4. **File naming conventions:**
- Skill directory: kebab-case (e.g., `architecture-evaluator`)
- SKILL.md: Required, exact filename
- References: descriptive kebab-case (e.g., `scoring-criteria.md`)
**Important:** Skills saved outside `plugins/<plugin>/skills/` will NOT appear in the marketplace.
## Output Templates
### Skill Output Template
```markdown
---
name: [skill-name]
description: >
[Description with PROACTIVELY activate for: (1)..., (2)..., (3)...]
Triggers: "[trigger phrases]"
---
# [Skill Name]
[One-line purpose]
## When to Use
[Ideal use cases and anti-patterns]
## Workflow
### Step 1: [First Step]
[Instructions]
### Step 2: [Second Step]
[Instructions]
## Parameters
| Parameter | Default | Options | Description |
|-----------|---------|---------|-------------|
## Output Format
[Expected output structure]
## Quality Gates
- [ ] [Gate 1]
- [ ] [Gate 2]
## Examples
[Example invocations and outputs]
```
## Quality Gates
Before completing skill generation:
- [ ] Pattern selection rationale documented
- [ ] All required parameters configured
- [ ] Technique provenance traced (which techniques from taxonomy)
- [ ] Output contract specified (from artifact-contracts)
- [ ] Triggers are specific and actionable
- [ ] Description includes numbered use cases
- [ ] Target plugin identified and skill saved to `plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/`
- [ ] All applicable checkpoints evaluated (ambiguity resolved via AskUserQuestion)
## Examples
**Example 1: Create evaluation skill**
User: Create a skill for evaluating architecture proposals
Advanced Skill Creator:
→ Task type: Evaluation/Comparison
→ Pattern: MOE-EVALURelated in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.