agent-artifex:guide
Use when the user is unsure which AI services skill to invoke, asks for "AI services guidance" generally, says "help me design my MCP server", "how should I structure my tools?", "what makes a good tool description?", "how do I design my agent?", "help me test my MCP server", "how should I test my agent?", "what testing do I need?", "my tests are flaky", "the agent picks the wrong tool", "how do I set up CI for AI tests?", or wants a structured guided experience that routes across multiple AI services skills. Also use when the user mentions designing or testing chatbots, tool descriptions, evals, or agent behavior without specifying a particular skill.
What this skill does
# agent-artifex:guide — AI Services Design & Testing Guide
## When to Use
Invoke `agent-artifex:guide` when:
- You're not sure which AI services skill to use — the guide routes you to the right one
- You want a structured guided experience
- You're working on a project that might need design help or multiple kinds of testing
- You want the skill suite to behave like a consultant that asks the right question first
For faster, more direct access, invoke the atomic skills directly (see table below).
---
## Orienting Question
On invocation, `agent-artifex:guide` asks exactly one question:
> **"Are you learning about designing and testing AI services, assessing gaps in an existing project, designing a new system, or ready to implement improvements?"**
User's answer determines the routing path below. Some answers don't fit neatly into one path — use the intent table at the bottom for common edge cases.
---
## Routing Logic
### Path 1: Learning
*User says: "I'm new to this," "explain the framework," "teach me about AI services," "what is faithfulness?"*
```
agent-artifex:foundations → comprehensive reference overview
agent-artifex:learn → interactive Socratic dialogue
```
Start with `foundations` if the user wants to read, `learn` if they want to be guided through it interactively.
### Path 2: Assessing
*User says: "What testing do we need?", "What are our gaps?", "We have some tests but I'm not sure they're enough," "We keep getting bad responses."*
```
agent-artifex:assess
→ [identifies design and testing gaps across the 5 areas]
→ prioritized recommendations
→ agent-artifex:implement (for areas that need improvement)
```
### Path 3: Designing
*User says: "Help me design my MCP server," "How should I structure my tools?", "What makes a good tool description?", "I need to plan my agent architecture."*
```
agent-artifex:design
→ [applies design principles to the user's problem]
→ tool description quality, server structure, agent architecture
→ agent-artifex:implement (when ready to build)
```
### Path 4: Implementing
*User says: "Help me improve my server," "I need to test my MCP server," "Write tool description quality checks," "Add evals for response accuracy," "Add tests."*
```
agent-artifex:implement
→ [determines which area(s) apply]
→ reads implementation references for code patterns
→ guides implementation with rubrics, formulas, and examples
```
### Path 5: Troubleshooting
*User describes a specific problem rather than a goal.*
Route based on symptom:
| Symptom | Route to | Why |
|---|---|---|
| "The FM picks the wrong tool" | `assess` then `implement` (Description Quality + Agent Behavior) | Likely a description quality problem — assess first, then fix |
| "Answers are wrong but the right tool was called" | `implement` (Response Accuracy) | FM synthesis problem — go straight to implementation |
| "Tests are flaky / too expensive" | `assess` | Probably LLM tests in CI — assess pyramid placement |
| "Quality degrades in long conversations" | `implement` (Chatbot Integration) | Context pressure or coreference — implement specific tests |
| "Works with one model but not another" | `implement` (Agent Behavior, multi-model stability) | Description sensitivity — implement cross-model scenarios |
| "Server errors confuse the FM" | `implement` (Server Correctness, error structure) | Error actionability — implement error path tests |
| "My tool descriptions are a mess" | `design` (Description Quality) | Needs design principles before implementation |
| "I have too many tools" | `design` (Server Structure) | Needs architectural guidance on tool decomposition |
---
## Skill Table
| Skill | Archetype | When to use directly |
|---|---|---|
| `agent-artifex:foundations` | Reference | "What is the framework?" "Give me the big picture." |
| `agent-artifex:learn` | Socratic | "Teach me about designing and testing AI systems." "Walk me through an example." |
| `agent-artifex:design` | Principles | "Help me design my MCP server." "What makes a good tool description?" |
| `agent-artifex:assess` | Assessment | "What design and testing gaps do we have?" "Audit our coverage." |
| `agent-artifex:implement` | Operational | "Help me improve my server." "Add tests." |
---
## The Causal Chain (quick reference)
```
Tool Description Quality → Agent Behavior → Server Correctness → Response Accuracy
(Discovery) (Tool Selection) (Invocation) (full loop)
leading leading leading OUTCOME
↑
Chatbot Integration
(multi-turn layer)
```
Response Accuracy is the only measure the user experiences. The other four are leading indicators that diagnose *why* response accuracy is high or low. When something goes wrong, trace backward through the chain.
## Recommended Next Step
After routing, the guide hands off to the selected skill. If the user's needs span multiple skills, chain them: assess first to identify gaps, design to plan improvements, then implement to build them.
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.