agent-email-patterns
Architecture patterns and best practices for giving AI agents email capabilities. Use when designing how agents send, receive, and manage email conversations, building two-way communication loops, implementing human-in-the-loop approval with drafts, choosing between WebSockets and webhooks, setting up multi-agent email topologies, handling OTP and verification flows, or securing agent email against prompt injection.
What this skill does
# Agent Email Patterns
Opinionated patterns for building AI agents that communicate over email. This skill covers architecture decisions, not SDK specifics. For AgentMail SDK usage, use the `agentmail` skill.
## Pattern 1: one inbox per agent
Every agent gets its own email address. Never share inboxes between agents.
```python
from agentmail import AgentMail
from agentmail.inboxes.types import CreateInboxRequest
client = AgentMail()
support_inbox = client.inboxes.create(
request=CreateInboxRequest(
username="support-agent",
display_name="Acme Support",
client_id="support-v1", # idempotent
),
)
# [email protected] is now live
```
Why:
- **Identity**: recipients see a clear sender
- **Isolation**: agents cannot access each other's email
- **Auditability**: every message is traceable to one agent
- **Security**: compromising one agent does not expose others
Anti-pattern: one shared inbox with multiple agents reading from it. This creates race conditions and makes debugging impossible.
## Pattern 2: two-way conversation loops
The core agent email pattern: agent sends, human replies, agent reads the reply and responds.
```
Agent sends initial email
-> Human replies
-> Agent reads reply (use extracted_text to strip quoted history)
-> Agent decides next action and responds
-> Loop continues until resolved
```
Implementation:
```python
# 1. Agent sends the opening message
client.inboxes.messages.send(
inbox_id,
to="[email protected]",
subject="Your support ticket #1234",
text="We received your request. Can you clarify the issue?",
)
# 2. Later: agent reads the reply.
# messages.list() returns MessageItem objects (metadata only — NO body).
# Fetch the full Message with .get() to access .text / .extracted_text.
response = client.inboxes.messages.list(inbox_id, limit=5)
for item in response.messages:
msg = client.inboxes.messages.get(
inbox_id=item.inbox_id,
message_id=item.message_id,
)
# extracted_text strips quoted history and signatures
new_content = msg.extracted_text or msg.text
# Feed new_content to your LLM for next response
```
Key rules:
- Always use `extracted_text` / `extracted_html` for inbound replies to avoid processing the entire quoted chain
- Track conversation state in your database, not in the email body
- To keep messages grouped in the same thread, call `client.inboxes.messages.reply(inbox_id, message_id, ...)` with the parent `message_id` — AgentMail routes the reply into the existing thread automatically. There is no `thread_id` parameter on the reply call.
## Pattern 3: human-in-the-loop drafts
For high-stakes emails, let the agent draft and a human approve before sending.
```python
# Agent drafts
draft = client.inboxes.drafts.create(
inbox_id,
to="[email protected]",
subject="Contract proposal",
text=agent_generated_text,
)
# Human reviews in console or via API, then:
client.inboxes.drafts.send(inbox_id, draft.draft_id)
```
Use drafts when:
- Email has legal or financial implications
- Recipient is a VIP or external stakeholder
- Agent is new and untrusted for this workflow
Send directly when:
- Routine notification (receipts, confirmations)
- Agent has proven reliability
- Speed matters (OTP forwarding, automated alerts)
## Pattern 4: event-driven architecture
Never poll for new emails. Use WebSockets or webhooks.
**WebSockets** (best for agents, no public URL needed):
```python
from agentmail import AgentMail, Subscribe, MessageReceivedEvent
client = AgentMail()
with client.websockets.connect() as socket:
socket.send_subscribe(Subscribe(inbox_ids=[inbox_id]))
for event in socket:
if isinstance(event, MessageReceivedEvent):
process_email(event.message)
```
**Webhooks** (for servers with public endpoints):
```python
webhook = client.webhooks.create(
url="https://your-server.com/agent/email",
event_types=["message.received"],
)
```
Decision guide:
| Factor | WebSockets | Webhooks |
|---|---|---|
| Public URL needed | No | Yes |
| Best for | Agents, bots, local dev | Servers, serverless |
| Latency | Lowest (persistent) | HTTP round-trip |
| Reconnection | You handle it | AgentMail retries |
## Pattern 5: multi-agent topologies
For systems with multiple agents, assign clear roles:
```
[email protected] -> customer support
[email protected] -> sales inquiries
[email protected] -> invoices and payments
[email protected] -> intake, routes to correct agent
```
Agents can email each other for internal coordination:
```python
# Support agent escalates to sales
client.inboxes.messages.send(
support_inbox_id,
to=sales_inbox.email,
subject="Lead handoff: Acme Corp",
text="Customer wants enterprise pricing. Full thread below.",
)
```
Use allow lists (`references/security.md`) to restrict which external senders can reach each agent. For hub-and-spoke, peer-to-peer, and hierarchical escalation patterns, see `references/multi-agent-topologies.md`.
## Pattern 6: OTP and verification flows
Agents that sign up for services need to receive and extract verification codes.
```python
import re
inbox = client.inboxes.create()
# Use inbox.email to sign up for a service
# Listen for OTP via WebSocket
with client.websockets.connect() as socket:
socket.send_subscribe(Subscribe(inbox_ids=[inbox.inbox_id]))
for event in socket:
if isinstance(event, MessageReceivedEvent):
text = event.message.text or ""
match = re.search(r"\b(\d{4,8})\b", text)
if match:
otp = match.group(1)
break
```
Best practices:
- Create a fresh inbox per sign-up flow for isolation
- Set a timeout (do not wait indefinitely for OTP)
- Delete the inbox after the flow completes if it is single-use
## Pattern 7: labels for workflow state
Use labels to track message processing state within an inbox:
```python
# When agent processes a message
client.inboxes.messages.update(
inbox_id, message_id,
add_labels=["processed", "needs-followup"],
remove_labels=["unread"],
)
# Query by label
unprocessed = client.inboxes.messages.list(inbox_id, labels=["unread"])
```
Common label schemes:
- `unread` / `processed` / `archived`
- `needs-reply` / `replied` / `escalated`
- `billing` / `support` / `sales` (category routing)
## Security essentials
See `references/security.md` for full coverage. Critical rules:
1. **Sanitize inbound email before passing to LLM** -- prompt injection via email is a real attack vector. Never pass raw email content directly as a system prompt.
2. **Use allow lists** on production agent inboxes to restrict senders.
3. **Verify webhook signatures** to prevent spoofed events.
4. **Never put API keys or secrets in email bodies or subjects.**
5. **Separate agent credentials from human credentials** -- each agent gets its own API key.
## Reference files
- `references/multi-agent-topologies.md` -- hub-and-spoke, peer-to-peer, and hierarchical agent email architectures
- `references/security.md` -- prompt injection defense, sender validation, credential isolation
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.