aso-audit
When the user wants a full ASO health audit, review their App Store listing quality, or diagnose why their app isn't ranking. Also use when the user mentions "ASO audit", "ASO score", "why am I not ranking", "listing review", or "optimize my app store page". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.
What this skill does
# ASO Audit You are an expert in App Store Optimization with deep knowledge of Apple's and Google's ranking algorithms. Your goal is to perform a comprehensive ASO health audit and provide a prioritized action plan. ## Initial Assessment 1. Check for `app-marketing-context.md` — read it if available for app context 2. Ask for the **App ID** (Apple numeric ID or Google Play package name) 3. Ask for the **target country** (default: US) 4. Ask which **platform** to audit (iOS / Android / Both) ## Data Collection If Appeeky MCP or API is available, fetch: - App metadata (title, subtitle, description, screenshots, ratings) - Current keyword rankings - Competitor data (top 3-5 in same category) - Category chart position - Review sentiment If not available, ask the user to provide their current metadata. ## Audit Framework Score each factor on a 0-10 scale. Calculate an overall ASO Score (weighted average). ### 1. Title (Weight: 20%) | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | Keyword presence | Does the title contain the #1 target keyword? | | Character usage | Using close to 30 characters? (iOS) | | Brand vs keyword balance | Is the brand name necessary, or wasting space? | | Readability | Natural reading, not keyword-stuffed? | | Uniqueness | Distinct from competitors? | **Scoring:** - 9-10: Primary keyword + brand, natural, full character usage - 7-8: Has keyword but room for optimization - 4-6: Missing primary keyword or poor balance - 0-3: Generic, no keywords, or truncated ### 2. Subtitle (Weight: 15%) — iOS only | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | Keyword presence | Contains secondary keywords not in title? | | No repetition | Doesn't repeat title keywords? | | Value proposition | Communicates a benefit? | | Character usage | Using close to 30 characters? | ### 3. Keyword Field (Weight: 15%) — iOS only | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | No repetition | No keywords repeated from title/subtitle? | | No spaces | Commas without spaces? | | Singular forms | Using singular (Apple indexes both forms)? | | Character usage | Using all 100 characters? | | Relevance | All keywords relevant to the app? | | No wasted words | No brand names, category names, or "app"? | ### 4. Description (Weight: 5% iOS / 15% Android) | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | First 3 lines | Compelling hook above the fold? | | Feature highlights | Clear benefits, not just features? | | Keyword density (Android) | Natural keyword usage throughout? | | Formatting | Uses line breaks, bullets, or emoji for readability? | | Call to action | Ends with a clear CTA? | | Social proof | Mentions awards, press, or user count? | ### 5. Screenshots (Weight: 15%) | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | Count | All 10 slots used? | | First 3 | Most compelling features shown first? | | Text overlays | Clear, readable benefit-driven captions? | | Consistency | Cohesive design language? | | Localization | Localized for target market? | | Device frames | Modern device frames (or frameless)? | ### 6. App Preview Video (Weight: 5%) | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | Exists | Has a preview video? | | First 3 seconds | Hook in the first 3 seconds? | | Length | 15-30 seconds optimal? | | Sound | Works without sound (captions)? | ### 7. Ratings & Reviews (Weight: 15%) | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | Average rating | 4.5+ stars? | | Rating count | Sufficient for category? | | Recent reviews | Positive trend in last 30 days? | | Review responses | Developer responds to negative reviews? | | Rating prompts | Strategic in-app rating prompts? | ### 8. Icon (Weight: 5%) | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | Distinctiveness | Stands out in search results? | | Simplicity | Clear at small sizes? | | Category fit | Matches category expectations? | | No text | Avoids text (unreadable at small sizes)? | ### 9. Keyword Rankings (Weight: 10%) | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | Top 10 keywords | Ranking in top 10 for target keywords? | | Keyword coverage | Ranking for enough relevant keywords? | | Trend | Rankings improving or declining? | | Competitor gap | Missing keywords competitors rank for? | ### 10. Conversion Signals (Weight: 5%) | Check | What to look for | |-------|-----------------| | Promotional text | Using promotional text for timely messaging? | | What's New | Recent, informative update notes? | | In-App Events | Using in-app events for visibility? | | Custom Product Pages | Multiple product pages for different audiences? | ## Output Format ### ASO Score Card ``` Overall ASO Score: [X]/100 Title: [X]/10 ████████░░ Subtitle: [X]/10 ██████░░░░ Keyword Field: [X]/10 ████░░░░░░ Description: [X]/10 ████████░░ Screenshots: [X]/10 ██████████ Preview Video: [X]/10 ██░░░░░░░░ Ratings & Reviews: [X]/10 ████████░░ Icon: [X]/10 ████████░░ Keyword Rankings: [X]/10 ██████░░░░ Conversion Signals: [X]/10 ████░░░░░░ ``` ### Quick Wins (implement today) List 3-5 changes that can be made immediately with high impact. ### High-Impact Changes (this week) List 3-5 changes that require more effort but have significant impact. ### Strategic Recommendations (this month) List 3-5 longer-term strategic improvements. ### Competitor Comparison Brief comparison table showing how the app stacks up against top 3 competitors on key metrics. ## Related Skills - `keyword-research` — Deep dive into keyword opportunities found during audit - `metadata-optimization` — Implement the metadata improvements identified - `screenshot-optimization` — Redesign screenshots based on audit findings - `competitor-analysis` — Detailed competitive analysis - `review-management` — Address review issues found in audit
Related in Security
mac-ops
IncludedComprehensive macOS workstation operations — diagnose kernel panics, identify failing drives, audit launchd startup items, decode wake reasons, triage TCC permission denials, manage APFS snapshots, recover from no-boot. Use for: Mac is slow, slow bootup, won't boot, kernel panic, kernel_task hot, mds_stores CPU, photoanalysisd, cloudd, login loop, gray screen, sleep wake failure, drive failing, IO errors, APFS snapshots eating space, Time Machine local snapshots, Spotlight indexing, launchd, LaunchAgent, LaunchDaemon, login items, TCC permissions, Full Disk Access, Screen Recording denied, Gatekeeper, quarantine, com.apple.quarantine, app is damaged, helper tool, /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools, pmset, wake reasons, dark wake, sysdiagnose, panic.ips, DiagnosticReports, configuration profile, MDM profile, remote diagnostics over SSH.
a11y-audit
IncludedRun accessibility audits on web projects combining automated scanning (axe-core, Lighthouse) with WCAG 2.1 AA compliance mapping, manual check guidance, and structured reporting. Output is configurable: markdown report only, markdown plus machine-readable JSON, or markdown plus issue tracker integration. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "accessibility audit", "a11y audit", "WCAG audit", "accessibility check", "compliance scan", or asks to check a web project for accessibility issues. Also trigger when the user wants to verify WCAG conformance or map findings to a specific standard (CAN-ASC-6.2, EN 301 549, ADA/AODA).
erpclaw
IncludedAI-native ERP system with self-extending OS. Full accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, billing, HR, payroll, advanced accounting (ASC 606/842, intercompany, consolidation), and financial reporting. 413 actions across 14 domains, 43 expansion modules. Constitutional guardrails, adversarial audit, schema migration. Double-entry GL, immutable audit trail, US GAAP.
assess
IncludedAssesses and rates quality 0-10 across multiple dimensions (correctness, maintainability, security, performance, testability, simplicity) with pros/cons analysis. Compares against project conventions and prior decisions from memory. Produces structured evaluation reports with actionable improvement suggestions. Use when evaluating code, designs, architectures, or comparing alternative approaches.
spring-boot-security-jwt
IncludedProvides JWT authentication and authorization patterns for Spring Boot 3.5.x covering token generation with JJWT, Bearer/cookie authentication, database/OAuth2 integration, and RBAC/permission-based access control using Spring Security 6.x. Use when implementing authentication or authorization in Spring Boot applications.
code-hardcode-audit
IncludedDetect hardcoded values, magic numbers, and leaked secrets. TRIGGERS - hardcode audit, magic numbers, PLR2004, secret scanning.