ast-grep
Guide for writing ast-grep rules to perform structural code search and analysis. Use when users need to search codebases using Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns, find specific code structures, or perform complex code queries that go beyond simple text search. This skill should be used when users ask to search for code patterns, find specific language constructs, or locate code with particular structural characteristics.
What this skill does
# ast-grep Code Search
## Overview
This skill helps translate natural language queries into ast-grep rules for structural code search. ast-grep uses Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns to match code based on its structure rather than just text, enabling powerful and precise code search across large codebases.
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when users:
- Need to search for code patterns using structural matching (e.g., "find all async functions that don't have error handling")
- Want to locate specific language constructs (e.g., "find all function calls with specific parameters")
- Request searches that require understanding code structure rather than just text
- Ask to search for code with particular AST characteristics
- Need to perform complex code queries that traditional text search cannot handle
## General Workflow
Follow this process to help users write effective ast-grep rules:
### Step 1: Understand the Query
Clearly understand what the user wants to find. Ask clarifying questions if needed:
- What specific code pattern or structure are they looking for?
- Which programming language?
- Are there specific edge cases or variations to consider?
- What should be included or excluded from matches?
### Step 2: Create Example Code
Write a simple code snippet that represents what the user wants to match. Save this to a temporary file for testing.
**Example:**
If searching for "async functions that use await", create a test file:
```javascript
// test_example.js
async function example() {
const result = await fetchData();
return result;
}
```
### Step 3: Write the ast-grep Rule
Translate the pattern into an ast-grep rule. Start simple and add complexity as needed.
**Key principles:**
- Always use `stopBy: end` for relational rules (`inside`, `has`) to ensure search goes to the end of the direction
- Use `pattern` for simple structures
- Use `kind` with `has`/`inside` for complex structures
- Break complex queries into smaller sub-rules using `all`, `any`, or `not`
**Example rule file (test_rule.yml):**
```yaml
id: async-with-await
language: javascript
rule:
kind: function_declaration
has:
pattern: await $EXPR
stopBy: end
```
See `references/rule_reference.md` for comprehensive rule documentation.
### Step 4: Test the Rule
Use ast-grep CLI to verify the rule matches the example code. There are two main approaches:
**Option A: Test with inline rules (for quick iterations)**
```bash
echo "async function test() { await fetch(); }" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: test
language: javascript
rule:
kind: function_declaration
has:
pattern: await \$EXPR
stopBy: end" --stdin
```
**Option B: Test with rule files (recommended for complex rules)**
```bash
ast-grep scan --rule test_rule.yml test_example.js
```
**Debugging if no matches:**
1. Simplify the rule (remove sub-rules)
2. Add `stopBy: end` to relational rules if not present
3. Use `--debug-query` to understand the AST structure (see below)
4. Check if `kind` values are correct for the language
### Step 5: Search the Codebase
Once the rule matches the example code correctly, search the actual codebase:
**For simple pattern searches:**
```bash
ast-grep run --pattern 'console.log($ARG)' --lang javascript /path/to/project
```
**For complex rule-based searches:**
```bash
ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml /path/to/project
```
**For inline rules (without creating files):**
```bash
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: my-rule
language: javascript
rule:
pattern: \$PATTERN" /path/to/project
```
## ast-grep CLI Commands
### Inspect Code Structure (--debug-query)
Dump the AST structure to understand how code is parsed:
```bash
ast-grep run --pattern 'async function example() { await fetch(); }' \
--lang javascript \
--debug-query=cst
```
**Available formats:**
- `cst`: Concrete Syntax Tree (shows all nodes including punctuation)
- `ast`: Abstract Syntax Tree (shows only named nodes)
- `pattern`: Shows how ast-grep interprets your pattern
**Use this to:**
- Find the correct `kind` values for nodes
- Understand the structure of code you want to match
- Debug why patterns aren't matching
**Example:**
```bash
# See the structure of your target code
ast-grep run --pattern 'class User { constructor() {} }' \
--lang javascript \
--debug-query=cst
# See how ast-grep interprets your pattern
ast-grep run --pattern 'class $NAME { $$$BODY }' \
--lang javascript \
--debug-query=pattern
```
### Test Rules (scan with --stdin)
Test a rule against code snippet without creating files:
```bash
echo "const x = await fetch();" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: test
language: javascript
rule:
pattern: await \$EXPR" --stdin
```
**Add --json for structured output:**
```bash
echo "const x = await fetch();" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "..." --stdin --json
```
### Search with Patterns (run)
Simple pattern-based search for single AST node matches:
```bash
# Basic pattern search
ast-grep run --pattern 'console.log($ARG)' --lang javascript .
# Search specific files
ast-grep run --pattern 'class $NAME' --lang python /path/to/project
# JSON output for programmatic use
ast-grep run --pattern 'function $NAME($$$)' --lang javascript --json .
```
**When to use:**
- Simple, single-node matches
- Quick searches without complex logic
- When you don't need relational rules (inside/has)
### Search with Rules (scan)
YAML rule-based search for complex structural queries:
```bash
# With rule file
ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml /path/to/project
# With inline rules
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: find-async
language: javascript
rule:
kind: function_declaration
has:
pattern: await \$EXPR
stopBy: end" /path/to/project
# JSON output
ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml --json /path/to/project
```
**When to use:**
- Complex structural searches
- Relational rules (inside, has, precedes, follows)
- Composite logic (all, any, not)
- When you need the power of full YAML rules
**Tip:** For relational rules (inside/has), always add `stopBy: end` to ensure complete traversal.
## Tips for Writing Effective Rules
### Always Use stopBy: end
For relational rules, always use `stopBy: end` unless there's a specific reason not to:
```yaml
has:
pattern: await $EXPR
stopBy: end
```
This ensures the search traverses the entire subtree rather than stopping at the first non-matching node.
### Start Simple, Then Add Complexity
Begin with the simplest rule that could work:
1. Try a `pattern` first
2. If that doesn't work, try `kind` to match the node type
3. Add relational rules (`has`, `inside`) as needed
4. Combine with composite rules (`all`, `any`, `not`) for complex logic
### Use the Right Rule Type
- **Pattern**: For simple, direct code matching (e.g., `console.log($ARG)`)
- **Kind + Relational**: For complex structures (e.g., "function containing await")
- **Composite**: For logical combinations (e.g., "function with await but not in try-catch")
### Debug with AST Inspection
When rules don't match:
1. Use `--debug-query=cst` to see the actual AST structure
2. Check if metavariables are being detected correctly
3. Verify the node `kind` matches what you expect
4. Ensure relational rules are searching in the right direction
### Escaping in Inline Rules
When using `--inline-rules`, escape metavariables in shell commands:
- Use `\$VAR` instead of `$VAR` (shell interprets `$` as variable)
- Or use single quotes: `'$VAR'` works in most shells
**Example:**
```bash
# Correct: escaped $
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "rule: {pattern: 'console.log(\$ARG)'}" .
# Or use single quotes
ast-grep scan --inline-rules 'rule: {pattern: "console.log($ARG)"}' .
```
## Common Use Cases
### Find Functions with Specific Content
Find async functions that use await:
```bash
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: async-await
language: javascript
rule:
all:
- kind: function_declaration
- has:
pattern: await \$EXPR
stopBy: end" /path/to/project
``Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.