axum-code-review
Reviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.
What this skill does
# Axum Code Review ## Review Workflow 1. **Check Cargo.toml** — Note axum version (0.6 vs 0.7+ have different patterns), Rust edition (2021 vs 2024), tower, tower-http features. Edition 2024 changes RPIT lifetime capture in handler return types and removes the need for `async-trait` in custom extractors. 2. **Check routing** — Route organization, method routing, nested routers 3. **Check extractors** — Order matters (body extractors must be last), correct types 4. **Check state** — Shared state via `State<T>`, not global mutable state 5. **Check error handling** — `IntoResponse` implementations, error types ## Gates (before reporting findings) Run **in order**. Do not write a finding until the step that applies has passed. 1. **Version and edition on disk** — **Pass when:** You have read the relevant `Cargo.toml` (crate or workspace root) and can state `axum` (and related tower/tower-http) versions and Rust `edition`. **Then** apply 0.6 vs 0.7+ or Edition 2024–specific checklist items only when that file supports them. 2. **Per-finding evidence** — **Pass when:** Each issue cites `[FILE:LINE]` from the **current** tree for the handler, router, layer, or type under review (not from memory, docs-only, or another branch). 3. **Category check vs protocol** — **Pass when:** For the finding type (routing conflict, extractor order, error leak, middleware order, etc.), you ran the matching checks from the [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) skill (e.g. full handler signature for extractor order; surrounding error mapping before “raw error to client”). **Then** add the finding. 4. **Output shape** — **Pass when:** The report lines match **Output Format** below (severity + description). ## Output Format Report findings as: ```text [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational Description of the issue and why it matters. ``` ## Quick Reference | Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | Route definitions, nesting, method routing | [references/routing.md](references/routing.md) | | State, Path, Query, Json, body extractors | [references/extractors.md](references/extractors.md) | | Tower middleware, layers, error handling | [references/middleware.md](references/middleware.md) | ## Review Checklist ### Routing - [ ] Routes organized by domain (nested routers for `/api/users`, `/api/orders`) - [ ] Fallback handlers defined for 404s - [ ] Method routing explicit (`.get()`, `.post()`, not `.route()` with manual method matching) - [ ] No route conflicts (overlapping paths with different extractors) ### Extractors - [ ] Body-consuming extractors (`Json`, `Form`, `Bytes`) are the LAST parameter - [ ] `State<T>` requires `T: Clone` — typically `Arc<AppState>` or direct `Clone` derive - [ ] `Path<T>` parameter types match the route definition - [ ] `Query<T>` fields are `Option` for optional query params with `#[serde(default)]` - [ ] Custom extractors implement `FromRequestParts` (not body) or `FromRequest` (body) - [ ] **Edition 2024**: Custom extractors use native `async fn` in trait impls (no `#[async_trait]` needed for `FromRequest`/`FromRequestParts`) ### State Management - [ ] Application state shared via `State<T>`, not global mutable statics - [ ] Database pool in state (not created per-request) - [ ] State contains only shared resources (pool, config, channels), not request-specific data - [ ] `Clone` derived or manually implemented on state type - [ ] **Edition 2024**: Shared static state uses `LazyLock` from std (not `once_cell::sync::Lazy` or `lazy_static!`) ### Error Handling - [ ] Handler errors implement `IntoResponse` for proper HTTP error codes - [ ] Internal errors don't leak to clients (no raw error messages in 500 responses) - [ ] Error responses use consistent format (JSON error body with code/message) - [ ] `Result<impl IntoResponse, AppError>` pattern used for handlers - [ ] **Edition 2024**: Handler return types `-> impl IntoResponse` capture all in-scope lifetimes by default; use `+ use<>` to opt out of capturing request lifetimes when returning owned data ### Middleware - [ ] Tower layers applied in correct order (outer runs first on request, last on response) - [ ] `tower-http` used for common concerns (CORS, compression, tracing, timeout) - [ ] Request-scoped data passed via extensions, not global state - [ ] Middleware errors don't panic — they return error responses - [ ] **Edition 2024**: Middleware using `#[async_trait]` can migrate to native `async fn` in trait impls ## Severity Calibration ### Critical - Body extractor not last in handler parameters (silently consumes body, later extractors fail) - SQL injection via path/query parameters passed directly to queries - Internal error details leaked to clients (stack traces, database errors) - Missing authentication middleware on protected routes ### Major - Global mutable state instead of `State<T>` (race conditions) - Missing error type conversion (raw `sqlx::Error` returned to client) - Missing request timeout (handlers can hang indefinitely) - Route conflicts causing unexpected 405s - **Edition 2024**: `async-trait` still used for `FromRequest`/`FromRequestParts` when native async fn works ### Minor - Manual route method matching instead of `.get()`, `.post()` - Missing fallback handler (default 404 is plain text, not JSON) - Middleware applied per-route when it should be global (or vice versa) - Missing `tower-http::trace` for request logging - **Edition 2024**: `once_cell::sync::Lazy` or `lazy_static!` used where `std::sync::LazyLock` works ### Informational - Suggestions to use `tower-http` layers for common concerns - Router organization improvements - Suggestions to add OpenAPI documentation via `utoipa` or `aide` ## Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag) - **`#[axum::debug_handler]` on handlers** — Debugging aid that improves compile error messages - **`Extension<T>` for middleware-injected data** — Valid pattern for request-scoped values - **Returning `impl IntoResponse` from handlers** — More flexible than concrete types - **`Router::new()` per module, merged in main** — Standard organization pattern - **`ServiceBuilder` for layer composition** — Tower pattern, not over-engineering - **`axum::serve` with `TcpListener`** — Standard axum 0.7+ server setup - **Native `async fn` in `FromRequest`/`FromRequestParts` impls** — `async-trait` crate no longer needed (stable since Rust 1.75) - **`+ use<'a>` on handler return types** — Edition 2024 precise capture syntax for RPIT - **`std::sync::LazyLock` for shared static state** — Replaces `once_cell`/`lazy_static` (stable since Rust 1.80) ## Before Submitting Findings Complete **Gates (before reporting findings)** and load the [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) skill for category-specific checks before any issue is final.
Related in Backend & APIs
jfrog
IncludedInteract with the JFrog Platform via the JFrog CLI and REST/GraphQL APIs. Use this skill when the user wants to manage Artifactory repositories, upload or download artifacts, manage builds, configure permissions, manage users and groups, work with access tokens, configure JFrog CLI servers, search artifacts, manage properties, set up replication, manage JFrog Projects, run security audits or scans, look up CVE details, query exposures scan results from JFrog Advanced Security, manage release bundles and lifecycle operations, aggregate or export platform data, or perform any JFrog Platform administration task. Also use when the user mentions jf, jfrog, artifactory, xray, distribution, evidence, apptrust, onemodel, graphql, workers, mission control, curation, advanced security, exposures, or any JFrog product name.
cupynumeric-migration-readiness
IncludedPre-migration readiness assessor for porting NumPy to cuPyNumeric. Use BEFORE substantial porting work begins when the user asks whether code will scale on GPU, whether they should migrate to cuPyNumeric, which NumPy patterns transfer cleanly, what must be refactored before porting, or mentions pre-port assessment, scaling analysis, or refactor planning. Inspect the user's source code, look up NumPy usage, cross-reference the cuPyNumeric API support manifest, and distinguish distributed-scaling-friendly patterns from blockers such as unsupported APIs, scalar synchronization, host round-trips, Python/object-heavy control flow, shape/data-dependent branching, and in-place mutation hazards. Produce a verdict of READY, LIGHT REFACTOR, SIGNIFICANT REFACTOR, or NOT RECOMMENDED, with concrete refactor pointers.
alibabacloud-data-agent-skill
IncludedInvoke Alibaba Cloud Apsara Data Agent for Analytics via CLI to perform natural language-driven data analysis on enterprise databases. Data Agent for Analytics is an intelligent data analysis agent developed by Alibaba Cloud Database team for enterprise users. It automatically completes requirement analysis, data understanding, analysis insights, and report generation based on natural language descriptions. This tool supports: discovering data resources (instances/databases/tables) managed in DMS, initiating query or deep analysis sessions, real-time progress tracking, and retrieving analysis conclusions and generated reports. Use this Skill when users need to query databases, analyze data trends, generate data reports, ask questions in natural language, or mention "Data Agent", "data analysis", "database query", "SQL analysis", "data insights".
token-optimizer
IncludedReduce OpenClaw token usage and API costs through smart model routing, heartbeat optimization, budget tracking, and native 2026.2.15 features (session pruning, bootstrap size limits, cache TTL alignment). Use when token costs are high, API rate limits are being hit, or hosting multiple agents at scale. The 4 executable scripts (context_optimizer, model_router, heartbeat_optimizer, token_tracker) are local-only — no network requests, no subprocess calls, no system modifications. Reference files (PROVIDERS.md, config-patches.json) document optional multi-provider strategies that require external API keys and network access if you choose to use them. See SECURITY.md for full breakdown.
resend-cli
IncludedUse this skill when the task is specifically about operating Resend from an AI agent, terminal session, or CI job via the official resend CLI: installing/authenticating the CLI, sending/listing/updating/cancelling emails, batch sends, domains and DNS, webhooks and local listeners, inbound receiving, contacts, topics, segments, broadcasts, templates, API keys, profiles, or debugging Resend CLI/API failures. Trigger on mentions of Resend CLI, `resend`, `resend doctor`, `resend emails send`, `resend domains`, `resend webhooks listen`, `resend emails receiving`, or agent-friendly terminal automation.
alibabacloud-odps-maxframe-coding
IncludedUse this skill for MaxFrame SDK development and documentation navigation on Alibaba Cloud MaxCompute (ODPS). Helps answer MaxFrame API, concept, official example, and supported pandas API questions; create data processing programs; read/write MaxCompute tables; debug jobs (remote or local); and build custom DPE runtime images. Trigger when users mention MaxFrame, MaxCompute with MaxFrame, ODPS table processing, DPE runtime, MaxFrame docs/examples, DataFrame/Tensor operations, or GPU runtime setup. Works for both English and Chinese queries about Alibaba Cloud data processing with MaxFrame.