backward-traceability
Make every number in the final PDF traceable to the exact code line that produced it. Uses \hypertarget/\hyperlink LaTeX commands and \num{formula} evaluated at compile time. Use for reproducibility and data integrity verification.
What this skill does
# Backward Traceability
Make every number in the final PDF hyperlink back to the exact code line that produced it.
## Input
- `$0` — Paper project directory containing code and LaTeX files
## References
- Traceability patterns and LaTeX commands: `~/.claude/skills/backward-traceability/references/traceability-patterns.md`
## Scripts
### Scan hypertarget/hyperlink references
```bash
python ~/.claude/skills/backward-traceability/scripts/ref_numeric_values.py \
--scan paper/main.tex --output report.json
```
Reports: all hypertargets, hyperlinks, orphan references, unreferenced numeric values.
### Verify cross-reference integrity
```bash
python ~/.claude/skills/backward-traceability/scripts/ref_numeric_values.py \
--verify paper/main.tex --code-output results.txt
```
Cross-checks values between paper text and code output. Reports mismatches.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Tag Code Outputs
For every numeric value produced by experiment code, add hypertarget tags:
```python
# In experiment code output:
print(f"\\hypertarget{{R1a}}{{45.3}}") # Mean accuracy
print(f"\\hypertarget{{R1b}}{{2.1}}") # Std deviation
```
Label format: `{prefix}{line_number}{letter}` where letter = a, b, c... for multiple values on same line.
### Step 2: Reference in Paper Text
Use `\hyperlink` to create clickable references in the paper:
```latex
Our method achieves \hyperlink{R1a}{45.3}\% accuracy
($\pm$\hyperlink{R1b}{2.1}).
```
### Step 3: Use \num for Computed Values
For values derived from other values, use `\num{}` for compile-time evaluation:
```latex
% \num{formula, "explanation"} → evaluated at compile time
The improvement is \num{45.3 - 38.7, "accuracy gain"}\%.
```
### Step 4: Generate Appendix Code Listing
Create an appendix with the full code listing, with `\hypertarget` anchors at relevant lines:
```latex
\section*{Appendix: Code Listing}
\begin{lstlisting}[escapechar=@]
@\hypertarget{code1}{}@result = model.evaluate(test_data)
@\hypertarget{code2}{}@accuracy = result['accuracy']
\end{lstlisting}
```
### Step 5: Verify Traceability
- Every number in the paper text must have a corresponding `\hypertarget` in the code
- Every `\num{}` formula must evaluate correctly
- Click-test: every hyperlink in the PDF must jump to the correct code line
## LaTeX Setup
Required packages:
```latex
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{listings}
```
## Rules
- Every numeric result in the paper MUST trace to code output
- Never manually type numbers — always reference tagged outputs
- Use `\num{}` for any derived/computed values
- Code listing in appendix must match actual executed code
- Verify all hyperlinks resolve correctly after compilation
## Related Skills
- Upstream: [experiment-code](../experiment-code/), [data-analysis](../data-analysis/)
- Downstream: [paper-compilation](../paper-compilation/)
- See also: [paper-assembly](../paper-assembly/)
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.