bigdata-financial-research-analyst
Bigdata.com MCP workflows plus institutional analysis layers: pre-synthesis EPIC-style filtering, valuation snapshots, earnings quality screens, moat/governance risk, sector KPI lenses. Use for: company briefs, earnings previews/digests, risk assessments, valuation snapshots, investment memos; macro sector/country/regional/thematic analysis; stock analysis, DCF or multiples concepts, red flags, thesis construction. Advanced event-driven topics (M&A arb, activism, distressed, shorts, spin-offs) live in equity-analysis references when users ask explicitly. Triggers: earnings preview/digest, risk assessment, "what is X worth", economic outlook, G7, analyze stock, valuation, peers.
What this skill does
# Bigdata.com financial analysis and equity research This skill combines **structured Bigdata.com workflows** (public company and macro deliverables) with **institutional-style equity analysis** (intrinsic value, variant perception, valuation, and quality checks). Use [Bigdata.com](https://bigdata.com) MCP tools for data; apply the equity layers when the user wants depth beyond a standard template. ### Identify the right company If the user provides a company name, call `find_securities` first to get the entity id. If the name is ambiguous, respond with: > "I found multiple companies named [X]. Did you mean [Company A] in [Industry] or [Company B] in [Industry]?" ## Analysis categories Read the appropriate reference file for the request: | Category | When to use | Reference | |----------|-------------|-----------| | **Public company** | Briefs, previews, digests, risk, **valuation snapshot**; always apply [references/public_company/analytical-frameworks.md](./references/public_company/analytical-frameworks.md) before synthesizing | [references/public_company/main.md](./references/public_company/main.md) | | **Macro economics** | Sector/country/regional/thematic analysis, rotation, cross-asset views | [references/macro/main.md](./references/macro/main.md) | | **Institutional equity** | Deep thesis, full DCF/SOTP write-ups, forensic accounting, sector playbooks, **advanced special situations** | [references/equity-analysis/main.md](./references/equity-analysis/main.md) | ### Routing examples - "Create an earnings preview for NVIDIA" → **Public company** - "Risk assessment for Tesla" → **Public company** - "What's happening with Apple?" → **Public company** - "Analyze the US technology sector" → **Macro economics** - "Economic outlook for Germany" → **Macro economics** - "Compare G7 economies" → **Macro economics** - "Macro analysis of financials in India" → **Macro economics** - "What is Tesla worth?", "valuation snapshot for Apple" → **Public company** [valuation-snapshot.md](./references/public_company/valuation-snapshot.md) - "DCF on Microsoft", "full sum-of-parts", "M&A arb on [deal]", deep forensic accounting → **Institutional equity** (often plus public-company data steps) ## Data foundation (MCP) Establish a factual base before deep analysis: 1. `find_securities` → entity id and company type (public/private) where applicable 2. `bigdata_company_tearsheet` → financials, estimates, sentiment, ESG (when analyzing a specific company) 3. `bigdata_search` → news, filings, transcripts, analyst/economic coverage 4. `bigdata_events_calendar` → upcoming earnings and conferences (when entity id is available) For **macro / country** work, use `bigdata_country_tearsheet` when available; follow fallbacks in [references/macro/main.md](./references/macro/main.md). ## Core philosophy (full equity thesis / memo) When producing an investment-style view, anchor on: 1. **Intrinsic value** — estimate business value independent of price 2. **Variant perception** — state clearly where your view differs from consensus 3. **Quality over quantity** — prioritize the few drivers that matter ## Earnings preview — mandatory sections When following [references/public_company/earnings-preview.md](./references/public_company/earnings-preview.md), treat as **mandatory**: **EPIC table** for primary drivers, **FaVeS** section (Fundamentals / Valuation / Sentiment), **Sentiment & positioning** data table (tearsheet + search), **scenario analysis** (bull/base/bear probabilities, prices, probability-weighted EV with math shown), **watch-for** column on earnings quality, and **regulatory/legal** search bucket. ## Investment thesis workflow (when depth is appropriate) Use this for comprehensive stock analysis or investment memos—not every brief or digest needs every step. ### Step 1: Company and data Use the **Data foundation** section above. ### Step 2: What matters (EPIC) | Test | Question | Pass criteria | |------|----------|----------------| | **E**ffect | Is it material? | ~10% change moves intrinsic value meaningfully (e.g. >5%) | | **P**redictability | Can you forecast it? | You have analytical or information edge | | **I**ndependence | Does consensus get it wrong? | Market systematically misjudges this | | **C**onsensus gap | Is there a gap? | Your forecast differs meaningfully | Focus on factors that pass all four. Detail: [references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/epic-framework.md](./references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/epic-framework.md). ### Step 3: Variant perception (FaVeS) | Element | Key questions | |---------|----------------| | **Fundamentals** | Which 2–3 KPIs drive value? Where could estimates be wrong? | | **Valuation** | What is intrinsic value? What multiple fits quality/growth? | | **Sentiment** | What is priced in (e.g. reverse DCF)? How are investors positioned? | You must articulate where you differ from consensus. Detail: [references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/faves-framework.md](./references/equity-analysis/variant-perception/faves-framework.md). ### Step 4: Quality and risk (before valuation) **Quick earnings quality screen:** OCF/NI (healthy typically >0.8; red flag <0.6 or diverging trends); accruals; DSO vs revenue trend. **Competitive position:** Moat type/strength ([moat taxonomy](./references/equity-analysis/competitive-analysis/moat-taxonomy.md)), ROIC vs WACC, competitive advantage period. **Management:** Capital allocation, insider activity, guidance track record ([capital allocation](./references/equity-analysis/management/capital-allocation.md)). ### Step 5: Value and recommend | Company type | Primary | Secondary check | |--------------|---------|-----------------| | Stable, profitable | DCF (FCFF) | EV/EBITDA, P/E | | High-growth, pre-profit | EV/Revenue; DCF with long CAP | Reverse DCF | | Bank / insurer | P/TBV; dividend discount | P/E, residual income | | REIT | NAV; P/AFFO | Implied cap rate | | Conglomerate | Sum-of-parts | Holdco discount | | Distressed | Liquidation / recovery | Asset coverage | Build **bull/base/bear** with explicit assumptions and probability weights where appropriate. ## Output templates (equity-style) | User pattern | Template | |--------------|----------| | Comprehensive "analyze [company]" / investment memo | [assets/templates/investment-memo.md](./assets/templates/investment-memo.md) | | "Quick view" / "what do you think of [stock]" | [assets/templates/quick-take.md](./assets/templates/quick-take.md) | | Post-earnings reaction note | [assets/templates/earnings-reaction.md](./assets/templates/earnings-reaction.md) | **Sector playbooks:** after you know the industry, use [references/equity-analysis/sector-routing.md](./references/equity-analysis/sector-routing.md). ## Scripts (optional quantitative helpers) **Default:** use `bigdata_company_tearsheet`, `bigdata_search`, and workflow steps (including valuation cross-checks and reverse-DCF **reasoning**) without running local Python. Use the scripts below **only when the user explicitly wants spreadsheet-style model output** or offline quant; run from the skill’s `scripts/` directory (or paths your environment expects). | Script | Purpose | When to use | |--------|---------|-------------| | [scripts/dcf_model.py](./scripts/dcf_model.py) | DCF with scenarios | User asks for built model / explicit scenarios | | [scripts/reverse_dcf.py](./scripts/reverse_dcf.py) | Implied growth extraction | User asks for scripted reverse DCF | | [scripts/earnings_quality.py](./scripts/earnings_quality.py) | Beneish M-Score, accruals | User asks for scripted quality metrics | | [scripts/peer_comparable.py](./scripts/peer_comparables.py) | Comp table | User asks for scripted comps | | [scripts/scenario_probability.py](./scripts/scenario_probability.py) | Expected value | User asks for scripted EV across scenarios | ## Quality standards **For investment memo / full thesis-style outputs**, include where rel
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.