blueprint-derive-tests
Derive test regression plans from git history by finding commits lacking tests. Use when finding untested bug fixes, coverage gaps, or generating a test backlog.
What this skill does
# /blueprint:derive-tests
Analyze git history to identify fix and feature commits lacking corresponding test changes, then generate a structured Test Regression Plan (TRP) document as a prioritized test backlog.
**Use case**: Systematically close test coverage gaps by mining commit history for bug fixes and features that shipped without regression tests.
## When to Use This Skill
| Use this skill when... | Use alternative when... |
|------------------------|-------------------------|
| Bug fixes ship without regression tests | You need to run existing tests (`/test:run`) |
| Want a prioritized test backlog from history | Writing tests for a specific feature (manual TDD) |
| Onboarding a project and assessing test health | Checking current test coverage metrics |
| Need to find which fixes lack test coverage | Designing a test strategy from scratch (`/test:architecture`) |
## Context
- Git repository: !`git rev-parse --git-dir`
- Blueprint initialized: !`find docs/blueprint -maxdepth 1 -name 'manifest.json' -type f`
- Total commits: !`git rev-list --count HEAD`
- Test framework: !`find . -maxdepth 3 \( -name 'vitest.config.*' -o -name 'jest.config.*' -o -name 'pytest.ini' -o -name 'pyproject.toml' -o -name 'Cargo.toml' -o -name 'go.mod' \) -type f -print -quit`
- Test files: !`find . -maxdepth 4 -type f \( -name '*.test.*' -o -name '*.spec.*' -o -name 'test_*' -o -name '*_test.*' \) -print`
- Conventional commits sample: !`git log --format="%s" --max-count=10`
## Parameters
Parse these from `$ARGUMENTS`:
- `--quick`: Fast scan (last 50 commits only)
- `--since DATE`: Analyze commits from specific date (e.g., `--since 2024-06-01`)
- `--scope AREA`: Filter to commits touching a specific area/scope (e.g., `--scope auth`)
Default behavior without flags: Analyze last 200 commits.
For detailed templates, severity matrix, and test mapping rules, see [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md).
## Execution
Execute this test regression plan derivation workflow:
### Step 1: Verify prerequisites
Check context values above:
1. If git repository is empty → Error: "This directory is not a git repository. Run from project root."
2. If total commits = "0" → Error: "Repository has no commit history."
3. If Blueprint initialized is empty → Ask user: "Blueprint not initialized. Initialize now (Recommended) or continue without manifest tracking?"
- If "Initialize now" → Use Task tool to invoke `/blueprint:init`, then continue
- If "Continue without" → Skip manifest updates in Step 7
### Step 2: Determine analysis scope
Parse `$ARGUMENTS` for `--quick`, `--since`, and `--scope`:
1. If `--quick` → scope = last 50 commits
2. If `--since DATE` → scope = commits from DATE to now
3. If `--scope AREA` → filter commits to those with scope matching AREA or touching files in AREA directory
4. Otherwise → scope = last 200 commits
Store scope parameters for git log commands in subsequent steps.
### Step 3: Detect test infrastructure
Scan for test framework and conventions:
1. Identify test framework from context (vitest, jest, pytest, cargo test, go test)
2. Detect test file naming convention:
- `*.test.ts`, `*.spec.ts` (JS/TS)
- `test_*.py`, `*_test.py` (Python)
- `*_test.rs`, `tests/` directory (Rust)
- `*_test.go` (Go)
3. Map source directories to test directories (e.g., `src/` → `tests/`, `src/` → `src/__tests__/`)
4. Record framework, naming pattern, and directory mapping for Step 5
If no test framework detected → Warn user, continue with file-based detection only.
### Step 4: Extract and classify commits
Extract fix and feature commits within scope:
1. **Primary targets** — `fix:` commits (highest priority for regression tests):
```bash
git log --format="%H %s" {scope} | grep -E "^[a-f0-9]+ fix(\(.*\))?:"
```
2. **Secondary targets** — `feat:` commits (should have accompanying tests):
```bash
git log --format="%H %s" {scope} | grep -E "^[a-f0-9]+ feat(\(.*\))?:"
```
3. **Fallback** — If conventional commit percentage < 20%, use keyword detection:
```bash
git log --format="%H %s" {scope} | grep -iE "(fix|bug|hotfix|patch|resolve|correct)"
```
For each commit, record: SHA, subject, date, files changed, scope (if conventional).
### Step 5: Analyze test coverage gaps
For each commit from Step 4, check for corresponding tests:
1. **Inline test changes** — Did the same commit modify test files?
```bash
git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r {SHA} | grep -E "(test|spec|_test\.|\.test\.)"
```
2. **Nearby test commits** — Within 5 commits after the fix, was a test commit added?
```bash
git log --format="%H %s" {SHA}..{SHA~5} | grep -iE "^[a-f0-9]+ test(\(.*\))?:|add.*test|test.*for"
```
3. **Test file exists** — For each modified source file, does a corresponding test file exist?
Use the source-to-test mapping from Step 3 (see [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md#test-to-source-mapping) for rules per language).
Classify each gap using the severity matrix from [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md#severity-classification):
| Severity | Criteria |
|----------|----------|
| Critical | `fix:` commit, no test changes, no test file exists for modified source |
| High | `fix:` commit, no inline test changes but test file exists (test not updated) |
| Medium | `feat:` commit, no test changes, core module affected |
| Low | `feat:` commit, no inline tests but nearby test commit exists |
### Step 6: Generate TRP document
TRPs live at the **top level** under `docs/trps/` — not `docs/blueprint/trps/`. This matches the sibling derive-* skills' top-level layout. Never write TRPs under `docs/blueprint/`; that path is reserved for blueprint machinery.
1. Create output directory: `mkdir -p docs/trps`
2. Determine TRP ID:
- If manifest exists, read `id_registry.last_trp`, increment by 1
- Otherwise start at `TRP-001`
3. Generate slug from scope or date range (e.g., `regression-gaps-2024-q3`)
4. Write TRP document to `docs/trps/{slug}.md` using template from [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md#trp-document-template)
Include in the document:
- YAML frontmatter with `id`, `status: Active`, `scope`, `date_range`, `commits_analyzed`
- Executive summary with gap counts by severity
- Detailed gap table: commit SHA, subject, severity, affected files, suggested test type
- Recommended test creation order (Critical first, then High, etc.)
- Suggested test type per gap (see [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md#suggested-test-types))
### Step 7: Update manifest
If Blueprint is initialized:
1. Update `id_registry.last_trp` with the new TRP number
2. Register the document in `id_registry.documents`:
```json
{
"TRP-NNN": {
"path": "docs/trps/{slug}.md",
"title": "{TRP title}",
"status": "Active",
"created": "{date}"
}
}
```
3. Update task registry:
```bash
jq --arg now "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" \
--arg sha "$(git rev-parse HEAD 2>/dev/null)" \
--argjson analyzed "{commits_analyzed}" \
--argjson gaps "{gaps_found}" \
'.task_registry["derive-tests"].last_completed_at = $now |
.task_registry["derive-tests"].last_result = "success" |
.task_registry["derive-tests"].stats.runs_total = ((.task_registry["derive-tests"].stats.runs_total // 0) + 1) |
.task_registry["derive-tests"].stats.items_processed = $analyzed |
.task_registry["derive-tests"].stats.items_created = $gaps |
.task_registry["derive-tests"].context.commits_analyzed_up_to = $sha' \
docs/blueprint/manifest.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json docs/blueprint/manifest.json
```
### Step 8: Report results and suggest next actions
Print summary:
```
Test Regression Plan Generated!
**Analysis Summary**
- Commits analyzed: {N} ({date_range})
- Fix commits found: {N}
- Feature commits found: {N}
**Coverage Gaps Found**
- Critical: {N} (fix commits with no tests at all)
- High: {N} (fix commits with stale test files)
- Medium: {N} (feature commits missing tests)
- Low: {N} (feature Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.