brainstorm
Use before any creative work or significant changes. Activates on "brainstorm", "let's brainstorm", "deep analysis", "analyze this feature", "think through", "help me design", "explore options for", or when user asks for thorough analysis of changes, features, or architectural decisions. Guides collaborative dialogue to turn ideas into designs through one-at-a-time questions, approach exploration, and incremental validation.
What this skill does
# Brainstorm
Turn ideas into designs through collaborative dialogue before implementation.
## custom rules loading
before starting, run this command via Bash tool to check for user-provided custom rules:
```bash
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/resolve-rules.sh brainstorm-rules.md ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}
```
if the output is non-empty, treat it as additional instructions that supplement (not replace) the built-in rules below. apply custom rules alongside the skill's own instructions throughout the brainstorm process — they may influence design preferences, naming conventions, technology choices, or other aspects of the brainstorm session. custom rules content is guidance for the brainstorm dialogue, not content to embed verbatim in the output.
### rules management
when the user asks to add, show, or clear custom brainstorm rules, handle these operations:
- **show rules**: run `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/resolve-rules.sh brainstorm-rules.md ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}` and display the output. if the output is empty, tell the user no custom rules are configured at either level. otherwise, to determine the source, check if `.claude/brainstorm-rules.md` exists and is non-empty (project-level) — if not, the output came from user-level. tell the user which level it came from.
- **add/update project rules**: write content to `.claude/brainstorm-rules.md` in the current working directory.
- **add/update user rules**: first check if `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA` is set (run `echo "$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA"`). if empty, tell the user that user-level rules require the plugin to be installed from the marketplace and offer project-level instead. if set, write content to `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA/brainstorm-rules.md`.
- **clear project rules**: delete `.claude/brainstorm-rules.md`.
- **clear user rules**: if `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA` is set, delete `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA/brainstorm-rules.md`. if not set, tell the user user-level rules are not available.
project-level rules (`.claude/brainstorm-rules.md`) take precedence over user-level rules (`$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA/brainstorm-rules.md`). when both non-empty files exist, only project-level rules are loaded. empty files are treated as absent and fall through to the next level. see `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/custom-rules.md` for full documentation on the rules mechanism.
**CRITICAL: this skill must NEVER modify its own files (skills, scripts, references, hooks, plugin.json). the ONLY files it may create or modify for rules management are `.claude/brainstorm-rules.md` and `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA/brainstorm-rules.md`. if the user asks to change the skill's behavior, suggest creating a plan — do not edit skill files directly.**
## Process
### Phase 1: Understand the Idea
Check project context first, then ask questions one at a time:
1. **Gather context** - check files, docs, recent commits relevant to the idea
2. **Ask questions one at a time** - prefer multiple choice when possible
3. **Focus on**: purpose, constraints, success criteria, integration points
Do not overwhelm with multiple questions. One question per message. If a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions.
### Phase 2: Explore Approaches
Once the problem is understood:
1. **Propose 2-3 different approaches** with trade-offs
2. **Lead with recommended option** and explain reasoning
3. **Present conversationally** - not a formal document yet
Example format:
```
I see three approaches:
**Option A: [name]** (recommended)
- how it works: ...
- pros: ...
- cons: ...
**Option B: [name]**
- how it works: ...
- pros: ...
- cons: ...
Which direction appeals to you?
```
### Phase 3: Present Design
After approach is selected:
1. **Break design into sections** of 200-300 words each
2. **Ask after each section** whether it looks right
3. **Cover**: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
4. **Be ready to backtrack** if something doesn't make sense
Do not present entire design at once. Incremental validation catches misunderstandings early.
### Phase 4: Next Steps
After design is validated, use AskUserQuestion tool:
```json
{
"questions": [{
"question": "Design looks complete. What's next?",
"header": "Next step",
"options": [
{"label": "Write plan", "description": "Create docs/plans/yyyymmdd-<task-name>.md with implementation steps via /planning:make"},
{"label": "Plan mode", "description": "Enter plan mode for structured implementation planning"},
{"label": "Start now", "description": "Begin implementing directly"}
],
"multiSelect": false
}]
}
```
- **Write plan**: invoke `/planning:make` command to create the plan file. Pass brainstorm context (discovered files, selected approach, design decisions) as arguments so the plan command has full context without re-asking questions
- **Plan mode**: uses EnterPlanMode tool for detailed planning with user approval workflow
- **Start now**: proceeds directly if design is simple enough
## Key Principles
- **One question at a time** - do not overwhelm with multiple questions
- **Multiple choice preferred** - easier to answer than open-ended when possible
- **YAGNI ruthlessly** - remove unnecessary features from all designs, keep scope minimal
- **Explore alternatives** - always propose 2-3 approaches before settling
- **Incremental validation** - present design in sections, validate each
- **Be flexible** - go back and clarify when something doesn't make sense
- **Lead with recommendation** - have an opinion, explain why, but let user decide
- **Duplication vs abstraction** - when code repeats, ask user: prefer duplication (simpler, no coupling) or abstraction (DRY but adds complexity)? explain trade-offs before deciding
## Task Tracking
When implementing after brainstorm:
- Track implementation tasks using available task management tools (task lists, plan file checkboxes, or similar)
- Mark each task as completed immediately when done (do not batch)
- Keep user informed of progress through status updates
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.