breakdown-plan
Issue Planning and Automation prompt that generates comprehensive project plans with Epic > Feature > Story/Enabler > Test hierarchy, dependencies, priorities, and automated tracking.
What this skill does
# GitHub Issue Planning & Project Automation Prompt
## Goal
Act as a senior Project Manager and DevOps specialist with expertise in Agile methodology and GitHub project management. Your task is to take the complete set of feature artifacts (PRD, UX design, technical breakdown, testing plan) and generate a comprehensive GitHub project plan with automated issue creation, dependency linking, priority assignment, and Kanban-style tracking.
## GitHub Project Management Best Practices
### Agile Work Item Hierarchy
- **Epic**: Large business capability spanning multiple features (milestone level)
- **Feature**: Deliverable user-facing functionality within an epic
- **Story**: User-focused requirement that delivers value independently
- **Enabler**: Technical infrastructure or architectural work supporting stories
- **Test**: Quality assurance work for validating stories and enablers
- **Task**: Implementation-level work breakdown for stories/enablers
### Project Management Principles
- **INVEST Criteria**: Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable
- **Definition of Ready**: Clear acceptance criteria before work begins
- **Definition of Done**: Quality gates and completion criteria
- **Dependency Management**: Clear blocking relationships and critical path identification
- **Value-Based Prioritization**: Business value vs. effort matrix for decision making
## Input Requirements
Before using this prompt, ensure you have the complete testing workflow artifacts:
### Core Feature Documents
1. **Feature PRD**: `/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}.md`
2. **Technical Breakdown**: `/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/technical-breakdown.md`
3. **Implementation Plan**: `/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/implementation-plan.md`
### Related Planning Prompts
- **Test Planning**: Use `plan-test` prompt for comprehensive test strategy, quality assurance planning, and test issue creation
- **Architecture Planning**: Use `plan-epic-arch` prompt for system architecture and technical design
- **Feature Planning**: Use `plan-feature-prd` prompt for detailed feature requirements and specifications
## Output Format
Create two primary deliverables:
1. **Project Plan**: `/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/project-plan.md`
2. **Issue Creation Checklist**: `/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/issues-checklist.md`
### Project Plan Structure
#### 1. Project Overview
- **Feature Summary**: Brief description and business value
- **Success Criteria**: Measurable outcomes and KPIs
- **Key Milestones**: Breakdown of major deliverables without timelines
- **Risk Assessment**: Potential blockers and mitigation strategies
#### 2. Work Item Hierarchy
```mermaid
graph TD
A[Epic: {Epic Name}] --> B[Feature: {Feature Name}]
B --> C[Story 1: {User Story}]
B --> D[Story 2: {User Story}]
B --> E[Enabler 1: {Technical Work}]
B --> F[Enabler 2: {Infrastructure}]
C --> G[Task: Frontend Implementation]
C --> H[Task: API Integration]
C --> I[Test: E2E Scenarios]
D --> J[Task: Component Development]
D --> K[Task: State Management]
D --> L[Test: Unit Tests]
E --> M[Task: Database Schema]
E --> N[Task: Migration Scripts]
F --> O[Task: CI/CD Pipeline]
F --> P[Task: Monitoring Setup]
```
#### 3. GitHub Issues Breakdown
##### Epic Issue Template
```markdown
# Epic: {Epic Name}
## Epic Description
{Epic summary from PRD}
## Business Value
- **Primary Goal**: {Main business objective}
- **Success Metrics**: {KPIs and measurable outcomes}
- **User Impact**: {How users will benefit}
## Epic Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {High-level requirement 1}
- [ ] {High-level requirement 2}
- [ ] {High-level requirement 3}
## Features in this Epic
- [ ] #{feature-issue-number} - {Feature Name}
## Definition of Done
- [ ] All feature stories completed
- [ ] End-to-end testing passed
- [ ] Performance benchmarks met
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] User acceptance testing completed
## Labels
`epic`, `{priority-level}`, `{value-tier}`
## Milestone
{Release version/date}
## Estimate
{Epic-level t-shirt size: XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL}
```
##### Feature Issue Template
```markdown
# Feature: {Feature Name}
## Feature Description
{Feature summary from PRD}
## User Stories in this Feature
- [ ] #{story-issue-number} - {User Story Title}
- [ ] #{story-issue-number} - {User Story Title}
## Technical Enablers
- [ ] #{enabler-issue-number} - {Enabler Title}
- [ ] #{enabler-issue-number} - {Enabler Title}
## Dependencies
**Blocks**: {List of issues this feature blocks}
**Blocked by**: {List of issues blocking this feature}
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Feature-level requirement 1}
- [ ] {Feature-level requirement 2}
## Definition of Done
- [ ] All user stories delivered
- [ ] Technical enablers completed
- [ ] Integration testing passed
- [ ] UX review approved
- [ ] Performance testing completed
## Labels
`feature`, `{priority-level}`, `{value-tier}`, `{component-name}`
## Epic
#{epic-issue-number}
## Estimate
{Story points or t-shirt size}
```
##### User Story Issue Template
```markdown
# User Story: {Story Title}
## Story Statement
As a **{user type}**, I want **{goal}** so that **{benefit}**.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Specific testable requirement 1}
- [ ] {Specific testable requirement 2}
- [ ] {Specific testable requirement 3}
## Technical Tasks
- [ ] #{task-issue-number} - {Implementation task}
- [ ] #{task-issue-number} - {Integration task}
## Testing Requirements
- [ ] #{test-issue-number} - {Test implementation}
## Dependencies
**Blocked by**: {Dependencies that must be completed first}
## Definition of Done
- [ ] Acceptance criteria met
- [ ] Code review approved
- [ ] Unit tests written and passing
- [ ] Integration tests passing
- [ ] UX design implemented
- [ ] Accessibility requirements met
## Labels
`user-story`, `{priority-level}`, `frontend/backend/fullstack`, `{component-name}`
## Feature
#{feature-issue-number}
## Estimate
{Story points: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8}
```
##### Technical Enabler Issue Template
```markdown
# Technical Enabler: {Enabler Title}
## Enabler Description
{Technical work required to support user stories}
## Technical Requirements
- [ ] {Technical requirement 1}
- [ ] {Technical requirement 2}
## Implementation Tasks
- [ ] #{task-issue-number} - {Implementation detail}
- [ ] #{task-issue-number} - {Infrastructure setup}
## User Stories Enabled
This enabler supports:
- #{story-issue-number} - {Story title}
- #{story-issue-number} - {Story title}
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Technical validation 1}
- [ ] {Technical validation 2}
- [ ] Performance benchmarks met
## Definition of Done
- [ ] Implementation completed
- [ ] Unit tests written
- [ ] Integration tests passing
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] Code review approved
## Labels
`enabler`, `{priority-level}`, `infrastructure/api/database`, `{component-name}`
## Feature
#{feature-issue-number}
## Estimate
{Story points or effort estimate}
```
#### 4. Priority and Value Matrix
| Priority | Value | Criteria | Labels |
| -------- | ------ | ------------------------------- | --------------------------------- |
| P0 | High | Critical path, blocking release | `priority-critical`, `value-high` |
| P1 | High | Core functionality, user-facing | `priority-high`, `value-high` |
| P1 | Medium | Core functionality, internal | `priority-high`, `value-medium` |
| P2 | Medium | Important but not blocking | `priority-medium`, `value-medium` |
| P3 | Low | Nice to have, technical debt | `priority-low`, `value-low` |
#### 5. Estimation Guidelines
##### Story Point Scale (Fibonacci)
- **1 point**: Simple change, <4 hours
- **2 points**: Small feature, <1 day
- **3 points**: Medium feature, 1-2 days
- **5 poRelated in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.