bugfix-quick
Fast bug fixes with root cause investigation + TDD. Enforces 'no fix without root cause' discipline and verification protocol. Without this skill, fixes are applied at symptoms instead of sources, and bugs return.
What this skill does
> **AI-consumed reference.** Optimized for Claude to read during execution.
> Human-readable explanation: see [docs/architecture/HIERARCHICAL_PLANNING.md](../../../docs/architecture/HIERARCHICAL_PLANNING.md)
> or [docs/getting-started/](../../../docs/getting-started/) depending on topic.
# Quick Bugfix
For bugs only. Features/refactors → run-orchestrator.
---
## Core Principle
**NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE.** Fix at SOURCE, not symptom.
## Process (4 Steps)
| Step | Name | Agent | Statusline |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Investigate | `lead` (inline) — uses Read/Grep/Bash to reproduce | `bugfix S1` |
| S2 | Test RED | `tester` — writes failing test | `bugfix S2` |
| S3 | Fix GREEN | `architect` / `frontend` / `mobile` (per artifact, via `agent-detector`) | `bugfix S3` |
| S4 | Verify | `tester` — runs full suite | `bugfix S4` |
**Announce per step.** When transitioning, surface to the user: `─── Step S{N} · {Name} ─── Dispatching {agent}…`. Also update `run-state.json#current_step` (one of: `investigate`, `test-red`, `fix-green`, `verify`) and `#active_agent` so the statusline reflects reality.
### 1. Investigate
- Read error + stack trace
- Reproduce the bug
- `git log` / `git diff` for recent changes
- Trace backward: where did bad data originate?
- **Context economy** (`rules/core/context-economy.md`) — Grep for the failing symbol first, then Read with `offset`+`limit` on the matched lines only. Don't read the full file unless the bug spans it.
### 2. Write Failing Test (RED)
- Test that reproduces the bug exactly
- **Pick the right layer** (`skills/test-writer/SKILL.md#test-type-selection`). If the bug is a UI / user-flow / auth / payment regression → **e2e spec via Playwright MCP**, not a unit test that won't actually reproduce it. If the bug is in pure logic → unit. The test must fail for the *right* reason.
- User confirms test FAILS
### 3. Fix (GREEN)
- Minimal, focused change at root cause
- User confirms test PASSES
### 4. Verify
- Run full test suite — **and the e2e suite if S2 wrote an e2e spec** (`npx playwright test` / `npx cypress run`). No regressions in either.
- Read output, THEN claim result. "Tests passed" with no pass count = `0 tests collected` = bug.
- **Wrong:** "Should work now" / **Right:** "Tests pass: [output]"
---
## Red Flags (Return to Step 1)
"Quick fix for now" / "Just try changing X" / "It's probably X" / "Seems fixed"
---
## Output
```markdown
## Bug Fix: [Description]
**Root Cause:** [Why — traced to source]
**Test Added:** [file + test name]
**Fix Applied:** [file + change summary]
**Verification:** Tests pass, no regressions
```
If complex → switch to `run-orchestrator`.
**Escalation:** If the bug resists quick fix (intermittent, race condition, "works on my machine", multiple plausible causes), escalate to `skills/deep-debugging/SKILL.md` for scientific-method root-cause analysis.
---
## Related Rules
- `rules/core/tdd-workflow.md` — Failing test before fix
- `rules/core/verification.md` — Run tests, read output, then claim
- `rules/core/execution-rules.md` — Root-cause discipline
- `rules/core/simplicity-over-complexity.md` — Minimal fix at root cause, no speculative refactoring during bug fix
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.