building-a-promotion-case
Build a promotion case and produce a Promotion Case Pack (target role + timeline, ladder mapping, evidence log, impact narrative, manager alignment plan, sponsor/visibility map, submission-ready promo doc). Use for promotion packet, getting promoted, leveling up, career ladder, promotion committee. Category: Career.
What this skill does
# Building a Promotion Case ## Scope **Covers** - Turning “I want a promotion” into a concrete **promotion thesis** tied to company priorities - Mapping your work to the **next-level expectations** (career ladder / competency model) - Building an evidence-backed **impact log** (metrics + artifacts + stakeholder proof) - Creating a **submission-ready promotion doc** (one-pager + appendix) that makes the decision easy - Aligning with your manager using a **partnership loop** (a.k.a. “Magic Loop”) and planning the next 4–12 weeks - Building a lightweight **sponsor/visibility plan** (political capital without being sleazy) **When to use** - “Help me write a promotion packet / promotion doc.” - “I need a promotion case that maps to our career ladder.” - “I want to get promoted this cycle—what should I do and how do I prove it?” - “My manager says ‘keep doing what you’re doing’—I need crisp promotion criteria and a plan.” - “I want to level up, but I’m not sure what evidence counts.” **When NOT to use** - You need compensation negotiation tactics for a new offer (this pack is about *internal promotion readiness*, not external offers) - You are in an HR/performance escalation (PIP, investigation, termination risk) — involve HR/manager process first - You don’t want to involve your manager at all (promotion decisions are manager- and org-mediated; this pack assumes partnership) - You only need a resume/LinkedIn rewrite (use a resume-focused workflow instead) ## Inputs **Minimum required** - Your role + scope today (team, product area, what you own) - Target level/role and timing (desired promo cycle/date) - Your company’s leveling rubric / ladder (or a description of expectations if you can’t share the doc) - 3–8 work examples from the last 6–12 months (projects, launches, decisions, cross-functional leadership) - Evidence signals (metrics, customer outcomes, reliability, revenue/cost, quality, speed, adoption) - Stakeholders involved (manager, partners, potential sponsors, promo committee style if known) **Missing-info strategy** - Ask up to 5 questions from [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md) (3–5 at a time). - If the ladder/process is unclear, proceed with a **generic ladder mapping** and label assumptions for the user to correct. - Don’t request confidential/PII; use anonymized numbers and redacted descriptions. ## Outputs (deliverables) Produce a **Promotion Case Pack** (Markdown in-chat; or as files if requested) in this order: 1) **Promotion thesis + target role/timeline** (what you’re asking for, why now) 2) **Next-level expectations map** (ladder/competencies → what “good” looks like) 3) **Evidence log** (impact table with metrics + artifacts + stakeholders) 4) **Competency mapping** (claims → evidence; gaps → plan) 5) **Impact narrative** (1-page story + “company problem solved” framing) 6) **Manager alignment plan (“Magic Loop”)** (asks, commitments, check-ins, decision criteria) 7) **Sponsor/visibility map** (who needs to believe what; how you’ll socialize) 8) **Risks / Open questions / Next steps** (always) Templates: [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) Expanded guidance: [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) ## Workflow (8 steps) ### 1) Intake + promotion process snapshot - **Inputs:** user context; [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md). - **Actions:** Confirm the goal (promotion vs broader career planning). Capture timing, process, and decision-makers. Identify constraints (confidentiality, limited metrics, org politics). - **Outputs:** Promotion context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list. - **Checks:** Target level and promo window are explicit; boundaries are respected. ### 2) Define the promotion thesis (make the decision easy) - **Inputs:** company priorities; your work themes; target level expectations. - **Actions:** Draft a 1–2 sentence thesis: *“Promote me to X because I already operate at X by doing Y which solves Z.”* Tie to a concrete company problem. - **Outputs:** Promotion thesis + 3–5 proof points (bullets). - **Checks:** Thesis is falsifiable and specific (not “I worked hard”). ### 3) Map next-level expectations (promotion ≠ career, but they should align) - **Inputs:** ladder/rubric (or proxy); target role definition. - **Actions:** Translate the ladder into a small set of competencies and “next-level signals.” Separate: (a) table stakes, (b) differentiators, (c) visibility/scope expectations. - **Outputs:** Expectations map + initial gap list. - **Checks:** Each competency has observable behaviors; gaps are concrete. ### 4) Build an evidence log (receipts, not vibes) - **Inputs:** 3–8 work examples; available metrics; artifacts. - **Actions:** Create an evidence table that captures: problem, your role, scope, decisions, outcomes, metrics/proxies, and partners. Identify where you need stakeholder quotes. - **Outputs:** Evidence log + “evidence missing” list. - **Checks:** Each major claim has at least 2 evidence types (metric/proxy + artifact/partner proof). ### 5) Convert evidence into a promotion doc draft (one-pager + appendix) - **Inputs:** thesis, expectations map, evidence log. - **Actions:** Draft the promo doc using the template. Write in exec-friendly language: impact, scope, leadership, leverage, and why you’re low-risk at the next level. - **Outputs:** Promotion doc draft + appendix (evidence snippets). - **Checks:** The doc is skimmable in 3 minutes; every claim has a pointer to evidence. ### 6) Manager alignment loop (“Magic Loop”) + criteria agreement - **Inputs:** draft doc; manager context; promo process. - **Actions:** Create a plan to align with your manager: ask what would make them confident, commit to what they ask, and schedule check-ins. Draft your “ask” script and the next 4–12 week plan. - **Outputs:** Manager alignment plan + 1:1 agenda/script. - **Checks:** Manager expectations are explicit; next check-in date is scheduled; you’ve made it easy to sponsor you. ### 7) Sponsor/visibility plan (politics as logistics) - **Inputs:** stakeholder map; known promo committee dynamics. - **Actions:** Identify 3–8 people whose belief matters. Plan how you will: (a) increase visibility of outcomes, (b) request feedback/endorsements, (c) avoid surprises. - **Outputs:** Sponsor/visibility map + outreach templates. - **Checks:** Every key stakeholder has a specific next action and a low-friction ask. ### 8) Quality gate + finalize - **Inputs:** full pack draft. - **Actions:** Run [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and score with [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). Tighten weak sections. Add **Risks / Open questions / Next steps**. Produce a submission-ready doc and a short “manager email” version. - **Outputs:** Final Promotion Case Pack. - **Checks:** Pack is evidence-based, ladder-aligned, and process-ready; risks and unknowns are explicit. ## Quality gate (required) - Use [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). - Always include: **Risks**, **Open questions**, **Next steps**. ## Examples **Example 1 (typical):** “I’m a Senior PM and want to get promoted to Staff PM in the next cycle (May). Here’s our ladder excerpt and 5 projects I led. Build a promotion case doc + evidence log + manager alignment plan.” Expected: Promotion Case Pack with a ladder-mapped narrative and concrete manager check-ins. **Example 2 (limited metrics):** “I’m a PM on an internal platform team. My impact is hard to measure. Help me build a promotion case using proxy metrics, stakeholder evidence, and artifacts.” Expected: Evidence log with proxies (cycle time, reliability, adoption, internal NPS) and explicit proof pointers. **Boundary example:** “My manager refuses to discuss promotions and HR is involved in a performance process.” Response: recommend following HR/manager process first; offer to help later with evidence capture, role expectations, and a future readiness pla
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.