built-in-metrics
Instrument an existing codebase with LaunchDarkly config tracking. Walks the four-tier ladder (managed runner → provider package → custom extractor + trackMetricsOf → raw manual) and picks the lowest-ceremony option that still captures duration, tokens, and success/error.
What this skill does
# Agent Metrics Instrumentation
You're using a skill that wires LaunchDarkly agent metrics around an existing provider call. Your job is to audit what's already there, pick the right tier from the ladder below, and implement it with the **least ceremony that still captures the metrics the Monitoring tab needs** (duration, input/output tokens, success/error, plus TTFT when streaming).
The single most important thing to get right: **default to the highest tier that fits the shape of the call**. Going lower ("just write the manual tracker calls") looks flexible but costs you drift, missed metrics, and legacy patterns the SDKs have moved past.
## The four-tier ladder
This is the order the official SDK READMEs (Python core, Node core, and every provider package) recommend. Walk from the top and stop at the first tier that fits:
| Tier | Pattern | Use when | Tracks automatically |
|------|---------|----------|----------------------|
| **1 — Managed runner** | Python: `ai_client.create_model(...)` returning a `ManagedModel`, then `await model.run(...)`. <br>Node: `aiClient.createModel(...)` returning a `ManagedModel`, then `await model.run(...)`. | The call is conversational (chat history, turn-based). This is what the provider READMEs lead with. | Duration, tokens, success/error — **all of it, zero tracker calls**. |
| **2 — Provider package + `trackMetricsOf`** | `tracker.trackMetricsOf(Provider.getAIMetricsFromResponse, () => providerCall())`. Provider packages today: `@launchdarkly/server-sdk-ai-openai`, `-langchain`, `-vercel` (Node) and `launchdarkly-server-sdk-ai-openai`, `-langchain` (Python). | The shape isn't a chat loop (one-shot completion, structured output, agent step) but the framework or provider has a package. | Duration + success/error from the wrapper; tokens from the package's built-in `getAIMetricsFromResponse` extractor. |
| **3 — Custom extractor + `trackMetricsOf`** | Same `trackMetricsOf` wrapper, but you write a small function that maps the provider response to `LDAIMetrics` (tokens + success). | No provider package exists (Anthropic direct, Gemini, Cohere, custom HTTP). | Duration + success/error from the wrapper; tokens from your extractor. |
| **4 — Raw manual** | Separate calls to `trackDuration`, `trackTokens`, `trackSuccess` / `trackError`, plus `trackTimeToFirstToken` for streams. | Streaming with TTFT, unusual response shapes, partial tracking, anything Tier 2–3 can't cleanly wrap. | Only what you explicitly call — it's on you to not miss one. |
Every provider — OpenAI, LangChain, Vercel, Bedrock, Anthropic, Gemini, custom HTTP — uses the same generic shape: `tracker.trackMetricsOf(getAIMetricsFromResponse, () => providerCall())` in Node, `tracker.track_metrics_of(get_ai_metrics_from_response, provider_call)` in Python. The extractor is the only thing that changes per provider: import `getAIMetricsFromResponse` from the matching `@launchdarkly/server-sdk-ai-<provider>` (or `ldai_<provider>`) package, or write a small custom function that returns `LDAIMetrics`. There are no provider-specific tracker methods.
## Workflow
### 1. Explore the existing call site
Before picking a tier, find the provider call and answer these questions:
- [ ] **Shape?** Is it a chat loop (history + turn-based), a one-shot completion, an agent step, or something else? → drives Tier 1 vs 2.
- [ ] **Framework?** Raw provider SDK? LangChain / LangGraph? Vercel AI SDK? CrewAI? Strands? → drives which Tier-2 provider package (if any) applies.
- [ ] **Provider?** OpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock, Gemini, Azure, custom HTTP? → cross-reference with the package availability matrix below.
- [ ] **Streaming?** If yes, you'll need TTFT tracking, which means Tier 4 for the TTFT part even if the rest is Tier 2.
- [ ] **Language?** Python or Node? Provider-package coverage differs between them.
- [ ] **Already using a config?** If not, route to `configs-create` first — tracking requires a tracker, which is obtained by calling `create_tracker()` / `createTracker()` on the config object returned by `completion_config()` / `completionConfig()` / `createModel()`.
- [ ] **On the current SDK API?** If the call site uses `aiclient.config(...)` / `aiClient.config(...)` or constructs an `AIConfig(...)` / `LDAIConfig` default, it's on the pre-0.20 surface. Migrate it as part of this work before adding tracking:
- `aiclient.config(...)` → `aiclient.completion_config(...)` for one-shot/chat or `aiclient.agent_config(...)` for agent mode (mirror the call signature). Node is the same with camelCase.
- `AIConfig(...)` default → `AICompletionConfigDefault(...)` or `AIAgentConfigDefault(...)` (Node: `LDAICompletionConfigDefault` / `LDAIAgentConfigDefault`). `AIConfig` is the base class the SDK returns; it isn't a valid default-value constructor — the typed `*Default` variants are.
- If the result was being tuple-unpacked (`config, tracker = aiclient.config(...)`), drop the unpack — the new methods return a single config object. Obtain the tracker via `config.create_tracker()` / `aiConfig.createTracker()`.
- For deeper rewrites (call sites with hardcoded model/prompt as well), hand off to `migrate` instead of doing the full migration here.
### 2. Look up your Tier-2 option
Use this matrix to decide whether Tier 2 (provider package) is available for your situation. If it's not, drop to Tier 3 (custom extractor). If the shape is chat-loop, go to Tier 1 first regardless of what's in this matrix.
| Framework / provider | Python provider package | Node provider package | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI (direct SDK) | `launchdarkly-server-sdk-ai-openai` | `@launchdarkly/server-sdk-ai-openai` | [openai-tracking.md](references/openai-tracking.md) |
| LangChain / LangGraph | `launchdarkly-server-sdk-ai-langchain` | `@launchdarkly/server-sdk-ai-langchain` | [langchain-tracking.md](references/langchain-tracking.md) |
| Vercel AI SDK | — | `@launchdarkly/server-sdk-ai-vercel` | (use the Vercel provider docs) |
| AWS Bedrock (Converse or InvokeModel) | — (use LangChain-aws or custom extractor) | — (use LangChain-aws or custom extractor) | [bedrock-tracking.md](references/bedrock-tracking.md) |
| Anthropic direct SDK | — | — | [anthropic-tracking.md](references/anthropic-tracking.md) |
| Gemini / Google GenAI | — | — | [gemini-tracking.md](references/gemini-tracking.md) |
| Strands Agents | — (Tier 3 custom extractor) | — (Tier 3 custom extractor) | [strands-tracking.md](references/strands-tracking.md) |
| Cohere, Mistral, custom HTTP | — | — | Tier 3 custom extractor |
| **Any provider, streaming + TTFT** | — (Tier 4 only) | `trackStreamMetricsOf` (no TTFT) + manual TTFT | [streaming-tracking.md](references/streaming-tracking.md) |
### 3. Implement from the matching reference
Once you know the tier and the provider, open the reference file and follow the pattern. The references are written so Tier 1 is always the first example, Tier 2/3 next, and Tier 4 last. Stop at the first tier that matches the app's shape.
Guardrails that apply to every tier:
1. **Always check `config.enabled`** before making the tracked call. A disabled config means the user has flagged the feature off — you should short-circuit to whatever fallback the app uses (cached response, error, degraded path) rather than making the provider call at all.
2. **Wrap the existing call, don't rewrite it.** Tier 2 and Tier 3 are designed to slot around an unmodified provider call. If you find yourself rewriting the call to fit the tracker, you're at the wrong tier — drop down one.
3. **Errors are handled inside `trackMetricsOf`.** The wrapper catches exceptions, records `trackError()` internally, and re-raises — do **not** add `except: tracker.trackError()` on top, it's a noop that also trips the at-most-once guard. Tier 1 handles both paths automatically. At Tier 4 (manual, streaming, `track_duration_of`) the caller does own the error-tracking call.
4. **Always flush before close.** Call `ldClient.flusRelated in Data & Analytics
clawarr-suite
IncludedComprehensive management for self-hosted media stacks (Sonarr, Radarr, Lidarr, Readarr, Prowlarr, Bazarr, Overseerr, Plex, Tautulli, SABnzbd, Recyclarr, Unpackerr, Notifiarr, Maintainerr, Kometa, FlareSolverr). Deep library exploration, analytics, dashboard generation, content management, request handling, subtitle management, indexer control, download monitoring, quality profile sync, library cleanup automation, notification routing, collection/overlay management, and media tracker integration (Trakt, Letterboxd, Simkl).
querying-soql
IncludedSOQL query generation, optimization, and analysis with 100-point scoring. Use this skill when the user needs SOQL/SOSL authoring or optimization: natural-language-to-query generation, relationship queries, aggregates, query-plan analysis, and performance or safety improvements for Salesforce queries. TRIGGER when: user writes, optimizes, or debugs SOQL/SOSL queries, touches .soql files, or asks about relationship queries, aggregates, or query performance. DO NOT TRIGGER when: bulk data operations (use handling-sf-data), Apex DML logic (use generating-apex), or report/dashboard queries.
app-store-optimization
IncludedApp Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklists, and tracking ranking changes.
habit-flow
IncludedAI-powered atomic habit tracker with natural language logging, streak tracking, smart reminders, and coaching. Use for creating habits, logging completions naturally ("I meditated today"), viewing progress, and getting personalized coaching.
app-store-optimization
IncludedApp Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklists, and tracking ranking changes.
visualizing-data
IncludedBuilds dashboards, reports, and data-driven interfaces requiring charts, graphs, or visual analytics. Provides systematic framework for selecting appropriate visualizations based on data characteristics and analytical purpose. Includes 24+ visualization types organized by purpose (trends, comparisons, distributions, relationships, flows, hierarchies, geospatial), accessibility patterns (WCAG 2.1 AA compliance), colorblind-safe palettes, and performance optimization strategies. Use when creating visualizations, choosing chart types, displaying data graphically, or designing data interfaces.