calibrate
Included with Lifetime
$97 forever
Use when workflow components are inconsistent, naming conventions vary, or a new team member's work needs alignment to project standards.
fix
What this skill does
## MANDATORY PREPARATION Invoke /agent-workflow — it contains workflow principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no workflow context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-maestro first. Consult the prompt-engineering reference in the agent-workflow skill for naming and style consistency patterns. --- Ensure consistency across all workflow components. Inconsistency creates confusion — for the model, for developers, and for users. ### Calibration Dimensions **Naming Conventions** - Tool names follow consistent pattern (verb_noun, noun.verb, or camelCase — pick one) - Agent names follow consistent pattern - Configuration keys follow consistent pattern - File names follow consistent pattern **Prompt Style** - All prompts use the same structural pattern (4-zone) - Consistent delimiter style (XML tags, markdown headers, triple-dash) - Consistent output schema format (JSON schema, markdown template) - Consistent instruction style (imperative, numbered steps) **Error Handling** - All tools return errors in the same format - Error codes follow consistent scheme - Error messages follow consistent tone - Retry logic uses consistent strategy **Logging** - All logs use the same format (JSON structured, text, etc.) - Consistent field names across all log entries - Consistent log levels (debug, info, warn, error) - Consistent PII redaction approach ### Calibration Process 1. **Identify the standard**: What's the most common pattern in the existing codebase? That's the standard. 2. **List deviations**: Find all components that deviate from the standard. 3. **Prioritize**: Fix the most impactful deviations first (user-facing > internal). 4. **Apply**: Make the changes, ensuring tests still pass. 5. **Document**: Update `.maestro.md` with the established conventions. ### Consistency Audit Table | Dimension | Standard | Deviations Found | Priority | |-----------|----------|------------------|----------| | Tool naming | ? | ? of ? tools | High/Med/Low | | Prompt structure | ? | ? of ? prompts | High/Med/Low | | Error format | ? | ? of ? tools | High/Med/Low | | Log format | ? | ? of ? entries | High/Med/Low | ### Calibration Checklist - [ ] Convention standard identified for each dimension - [ ] All deviations listed with location - [ ] Highest impact deviations fixed first - [ ] Tests pass after each calibration change - [ ] Updated `.maestro.md` with established conventions ### Recommended Next Step After calibration, run `/refine` for a final polish pass, or `/evaluate` to verify consistency improvements. **NEVER**: - Invent new conventions when existing ones work - Calibrate in a way that changes behavior (this is standardization, not refactoring) - Skip test verification after calibration - Change naming conventions without updating all references
Related in fix
zero-defect
IncludedUse when you need maximum precision on a critical task — production deployments, security-sensitive code, financial calculations, or any work where mistakes are unacceptable.
fix
fortify
IncludedUse when the workflow lacks error handling, has been failing in production, or needs retry logic, fallback strategies, and circuit breakers.
fix
refine
IncludedUse when the workflow works but needs polish, or as the final step in a diagnose → fix → refine cycle before shipping.
fix
streamline
IncludedUse when the workflow feels too complex, has accumulated cruft, or has redundant steps and overlapping tools that need consolidation.
fix