catalog-value-estimator
Estimate the value and performance of a music catalog, album, or individual recording from public/streaming data alone — no seller files, no royalty statements required. Use this whenever the user wants to value a catalog or asset, project annual Net Label Share (NLS) or Net Publisher Share, build a catalog/portfolio baseline, measure how an asset is performing over time, run a "streams → revenue → value" model, or produce an executive baseline report — even if they don't say the words "Catalog Value Estimator". Triggers include "what is this catalog worth", "value the K.I.D.S. masters", "estimate NLS", "how is this album performing", "build a portfolio baseline", "streams to revenue", "annualize streams", "catalog value from public data", or any request to size/track a master or publishing asset using Songstats/streaming data via the Recoup Research API. Prefer this skill over hand-rolled curl when the goal is a defensible, reproducible value or performance number.
What this skill does
# Catalog Value Estimator
Turn public streaming data into a defensible, reproducible estimate of a music
asset's **performance** and **value** — assembled with zero seller cooperation,
so it can be produced before a deal, used to verify a counterparty's claims, or
frozen as a baseline to measure impact over time.
The whole method rests on one identity:
> **Catalog value = sustainable annual Net Label Share (NLS) × a market multiple**
NLS is what the owner *keeps* after distribution and artist/producer royalties —
not gross streaming revenue. The job of this skill is to measure real streams,
convert them to annual NLS through a labeled, auditable assumption stack, apply
a multiple, and surface the risks (concentration, rights flags) that move the
multiple — all while being honest about what is *measured* vs *assumed*.
## When to use this
Reach for this skill for any of: valuing a catalog/album/track, projecting
annual NLS, building a portfolio baseline, tracking an asset's performance over
time, or producing a streams→revenue→value report. It works on one recording or
thousands. It does **not** need royalty statements — when those exist, use them
to calibrate (see "Verification loop").
## Prerequisites
- **Recoup API access.** All streaming data comes from the Recoup Research API
(Songstats-backed). Set `RECOUP_API_KEY` (sent as `x-api-key`) **or**
`RECOUP_ACCESS_TOKEN` (sent as `Authorization: Bearer`). In a Recoup sandbox
`RECOUP_ACCESS_TOKEN` is already present. To get a key, see
`references/recoup-api.md`.
- `python3` with `matplotlib` and `reportlab` (only for the PDF report):
`pip install --break-system-packages matplotlib reportlab`.
- `curl` available on PATH (the scripts shell out to it).
## The loop (five steps)
1. **Assemble the asset + identifiers.** Resolve the recordings you want to
value into Spotify track IDs or ISRCs, and confirm ownership from public
metadata (the `℗`/P-line, `labels`, and `distributors` returned by the API).
- Have ISRCs or Spotify track IDs already → skip to step 2.
- Have a Spotify album → `scripts/fetch_album_tracks.py --album <id|url>`
prints the track IDs.
- Have only an artist/label name → resolve the catalog first (see
`references/recoup-api.md`: `lookup`, `tracks`),
then feed the IDs in.
2. **Measure streams.** For every track, pull all-time per-platform counts
(`/research/track/stats`) and the trailing-12-month delta
(`/research/track/historic-stats`, diff the cumulative `streams_total` at the
window endpoints). `scripts/estimate.py` does both.
3. **Model gross → NLS → value.** Apply public per-stream rates, the deduction
stack, and the multiple band from `references/methodology.md`. Keep
*measured* platforms separate from *approximated* ones and carry a band, not
a point.
4. **Surface risk.** Compute concentration (top-track and top-3 share of
streams) and flag anything that moves the multiple — single-track
dependency, plateauing run-rate, sample-driven hits, registration gaps.
These are as important as the dollar figure.
5. **Report.** Emit the structured results, and — if the user wants something
shareable — a branded executive PDF via `scripts/build_report.py`.
Run steps 2–4 with one command:
```bash
python3 scripts/estimate.py \
--ids <comma-separated Spotify track IDs> # or --isrcs / --ids-file
--asset-name "K.I.D.S." --owner "Rostrum Records" \
--out ./out
# -> out/estimate.json (full results) + out/summary.md (human-readable)
```
Then, optionally:
```bash
python3 scripts/build_report.py --estimate ./out/estimate.json --out ./out
# -> out/<asset>-baseline-report.pdf (charts + valuation + methodology)
```
`estimate.py` and `build_report.py` are the workhorses — don't re-derive their
logic inline; call them so every run is identical and auditable.
## Reading the output
`estimate.json` contains, per asset: all-time and trailing-12-month streams per
platform, gross/NLS/value with low–central–high bands, the per-track table, the
concentration metrics, and the exact assumption set used (so any number can be
traced back). `summary.md` is the same thing in prose + a table.
Lead with what's **measured** (streams are real, pulled live) and present the
dollar figures as a **directional model** with assumptions visible. This matters
especially when sharing with a rights owner who knows their real numbers —
overclaiming a value you derived from public rates costs credibility.
## Honest limits (state these in any output)
- **Measured vs approximated platforms.** Songstats exposes per-track streams
for Spotify, YouTube, and SoundCloud; Apple/Amazon/Deezer/Tidal return
playlist data but not stream counts, so their revenue is a labeled gross-up.
The measured-platform figure is a floor; true revenue is higher.
- **Master-side only by default.** This values recordings (NLS). Publishing
(NPS — mechanical + performance) is separate and additive; only model it if
the owner controls the compositions.
- **History depth.** Day-level streaming history typically starts ~2021, so
annual trajectories may be ~5 years even for older catalogs. The all-time
cumulative still reflects the full life.
- **Every rate, deduction, and multiple is an assumption** (see methodology).
The multiple is the single biggest swing — concentration and a flat run-rate
argue for the low end.
## Calibration & the verification loop
When a public comp exists (a reported sale/ask), sanity-check the estimate
against it — but match scope (a single album vs a multi-album, multi-artist
portfolio). When a real royalty statement becomes available, solve for the
counterparty's true blended per-stream rate and deduction stack, replace the
defaults, and the band collapses. Each real statement makes the next
permissionless estimate more accurate — fold corrections back into the config.
## What to read next
- `references/methodology.md` — the full assumption set: per-stream rates, the
gross→NLS deduction stack, multiple bands, the gross-up, the TTM annualization
mechanic, calibration, and caveats. **Read this before quoting any number.**
- `references/recoup-api.md` — auth and the exact endpoints used (`track/stats`,
`track/historic-stats`, `tracks`, `lookup`, `spotify/album`), with examples.
Related in Backend & APIs
jfrog
IncludedInteract with the JFrog Platform via the JFrog CLI and REST/GraphQL APIs. Use this skill when the user wants to manage Artifactory repositories, upload or download artifacts, manage builds, configure permissions, manage users and groups, work with access tokens, configure JFrog CLI servers, search artifacts, manage properties, set up replication, manage JFrog Projects, run security audits or scans, look up CVE details, query exposures scan results from JFrog Advanced Security, manage release bundles and lifecycle operations, aggregate or export platform data, or perform any JFrog Platform administration task. Also use when the user mentions jf, jfrog, artifactory, xray, distribution, evidence, apptrust, onemodel, graphql, workers, mission control, curation, advanced security, exposures, or any JFrog product name.
cupynumeric-migration-readiness
IncludedPre-migration readiness assessor for porting NumPy to cuPyNumeric. Use BEFORE substantial porting work begins when the user asks whether code will scale on GPU, whether they should migrate to cuPyNumeric, which NumPy patterns transfer cleanly, what must be refactored before porting, or mentions pre-port assessment, scaling analysis, or refactor planning. Inspect the user's source code, look up NumPy usage, cross-reference the cuPyNumeric API support manifest, and distinguish distributed-scaling-friendly patterns from blockers such as unsupported APIs, scalar synchronization, host round-trips, Python/object-heavy control flow, shape/data-dependent branching, and in-place mutation hazards. Produce a verdict of READY, LIGHT REFACTOR, SIGNIFICANT REFACTOR, or NOT RECOMMENDED, with concrete refactor pointers.
alibabacloud-data-agent-skill
IncludedInvoke Alibaba Cloud Apsara Data Agent for Analytics via CLI to perform natural language-driven data analysis on enterprise databases. Data Agent for Analytics is an intelligent data analysis agent developed by Alibaba Cloud Database team for enterprise users. It automatically completes requirement analysis, data understanding, analysis insights, and report generation based on natural language descriptions. This tool supports: discovering data resources (instances/databases/tables) managed in DMS, initiating query or deep analysis sessions, real-time progress tracking, and retrieving analysis conclusions and generated reports. Use this Skill when users need to query databases, analyze data trends, generate data reports, ask questions in natural language, or mention "Data Agent", "data analysis", "database query", "SQL analysis", "data insights".
token-optimizer
IncludedReduce OpenClaw token usage and API costs through smart model routing, heartbeat optimization, budget tracking, and native 2026.2.15 features (session pruning, bootstrap size limits, cache TTL alignment). Use when token costs are high, API rate limits are being hit, or hosting multiple agents at scale. The 4 executable scripts (context_optimizer, model_router, heartbeat_optimizer, token_tracker) are local-only — no network requests, no subprocess calls, no system modifications. Reference files (PROVIDERS.md, config-patches.json) document optional multi-provider strategies that require external API keys and network access if you choose to use them. See SECURITY.md for full breakdown.
resend-cli
IncludedUse this skill when the task is specifically about operating Resend from an AI agent, terminal session, or CI job via the official resend CLI: installing/authenticating the CLI, sending/listing/updating/cancelling emails, batch sends, domains and DNS, webhooks and local listeners, inbound receiving, contacts, topics, segments, broadcasts, templates, API keys, profiles, or debugging Resend CLI/API failures. Trigger on mentions of Resend CLI, `resend`, `resend doctor`, `resend emails send`, `resend domains`, `resend webhooks listen`, `resend emails receiving`, or agent-friendly terminal automation.
alibabacloud-odps-maxframe-coding
IncludedUse this skill for MaxFrame SDK development and documentation navigation on Alibaba Cloud MaxCompute (ODPS). Helps answer MaxFrame API, concept, official example, and supported pandas API questions; create data processing programs; read/write MaxCompute tables; debug jobs (remote or local); and build custom DPE runtime images. Trigger when users mention MaxFrame, MaxCompute with MaxFrame, ODPS table processing, DPE runtime, MaxFrame docs/examples, DataFrame/Tensor operations, or GPU runtime setup. Works for both English and Chinese queries about Alibaba Cloud data processing with MaxFrame.