cco-review
/cs:cco-review <plan> — Retention-obsessed Chief Customer Officer interrogation of any plan that touches customer retention, segmentation, CS team sizing, or CS team hiring.
What this skill does
# /cs:cco-review — CCO Forcing Questions **Command:** `/cs:cco-review <plan>` The retention-obsessed CCO pressure-tests any plan that touches customer experience. Six questions before any retention claim, segmentation change, CS team expansion, or major CS hire. ## When to Run - Before any board narrative that includes a retention number - Before approving a CS team headcount expansion - Before re-segmenting the customer base or changing tier definitions - Before launching a customer marketing or advocacy program - Before a major CS hire (CSM, AM, Implementation, Customer Marketing) - When NRR is "great" but churn complaints from CSMs are increasing - Before deciding whether to add an AM role separate from CSM ## The Six CCO Questions ### 1. What's the GROSS retention rate? **Not NRR. Gross.** NRR can hide a leaky bucket behind expansion. - GRR healthy ≥ 90% at growth stage, ≥ 95% at scale - If GRR < 85% but NRR > 100%, the product is failing for 15%+ of customers; expansion is masking the failure - Run `retention_decomposition_analyzer.py` ### 2. What's the #1 reason customers leave? **If you can't name it, you don't understand churn.** - 7-category taxonomy: product_fit / competitor_loss / no_value_realized / pricing / champion_left / company_event / tactical_failure - Preventable churn = product_fit + no_value_realized + tactical_failure - If preventable > 50%, CS has clear leverage; if < 30%, churn is structural (ICP, market, competition) ### 3. What's the median time-to-value (TTV) by segment? **Long TTV signals different problems by segment.** - Long TTV in low tier = ICP misfit; downgrade or kill - Long TTV in high tier = onboarding broken; fix the Implementation Manager handoff - TTV is a leading indicator of GRR ### 4. Which customer would you fire today? **If "none" — your segmentation is broken.** - Some accounts cost more than they earn (support cost > 50% of ARR + low ICP fit) - Run `customer_segmentation_designer.py` to surface kill list - The 3 paths for kill candidates: non-renewal / downgrade-to-tech-touch / raise-price-to-cost-recover ### 5. What's the ARR-per-CSM ratio, and is the model pooled or named? **Wrong model wastes capacity.** - Strategic: named + exec sponsor, $300K-$1M ARR/CSM - Enterprise: named, $500K-$2M - Mid-market: pooled, $2M-$5M - SMB: tech-touch, $5M+ - Run `cs_coverage_calculator.py` to size the team ### 6. Is CS in your comp plan, and how is it different from Sales comp? **Misalignment is the leading indicator of CS failure.** - CS comp: 70/30 base/variable typical - Variable: 50% gross retention + 30% net retention + 20% activity - Anti-pattern: comp CSMs on NPS — they game it - Anti-pattern: comp CSMs same as Sales — they sell instead of serve ## Workflow ```bash # 1. Retention decomposition (always start here) python ../../../skills/chief-customer-officer-advisor/scripts/retention_decomposition_analyzer.py cohorts.json # 2. Segmentation audit python ../../../skills/chief-customer-officer-advisor/scripts/customer_segmentation_designer.py customers.json # 3. Coverage sizing (if making CS team changes) python ../../../skills/chief-customer-officer-advisor/scripts/cs_coverage_calculator.py book.json ``` ## Output Format ```markdown # CCO Review: <plan> **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD ## The Decision Being Made [one sentence — retention | segmentation | coverage | next hire] ## Retention (if applicable) - GRR: X% (vs vanity NRR of Y%) - Top churn driver: <category> at X% of churn - Preventable churn: X% (CS-controllable) - Leaky-bucket pattern? yes/no ## Segmentation (if applicable) - Tier distribution: Strategic X / Enterprise X / Mid-market X / SMB X - Kill list size: N customers (X% of customers, Y% of ARR) - Upgrade candidates: N ## Coverage (if applicable) - Current CSMs: N | Required now: M | Required 12mo: P - Annual cost (12mo): $X - Manager trigger fired: yes/no ## Org (if applicable) - Next hire: <CSM | Support | AM | IM | CS Ops | Customer Marketing> - Why this, not the alternative: <one line> - Customer outcome unblocked: <specific> ## Verdict 🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK ## Next Steps [3 concrete actions] ``` ## Routing - `/cs:cpo-review` — if churn root cause is product_fit or no_value_realized - `/cs:cro-review` — if expansion math or comp alignment is in question - `/cs:cfo-review` — for CS cost commitments and retention-impact-on-revenue - `/cs:chro-review` — for CS hires, comp, ladder - `/cs:decide` — log the verdict - `/cs:freeze 30` — on multi-year CS comp plan changes ## Related - Agent: [`cs-cco-advisor`](../../agents/cs-cco-advisor.md) - Skill: [`chief-customer-officer-advisor`](../../../skills/chief-customer-officer-advisor/SKILL.md) - Adjacent: `../../../../business-growth/` (tactical CS execution) --- **Version:** 1.0.0
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.