clarify
Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions. Makes interfaces easier to understand and use.
What this skill does
Identify and improve unclear, confusing, or poorly written interface text to make the product easier to understand and use. ## MANDATORY PREPARATION Use the frontend-design skill — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run teach-impeccable first. Additionally gather: audience technical level and users' mental state in context. --- ## Assess Current Copy Identify what makes the text unclear or ineffective: 1. **Find clarity problems**: - **Jargon**: Technical terms users won't understand - **Ambiguity**: Multiple interpretations possible - **Passive voice**: "Your file has been uploaded" vs "We uploaded your file" - **Length**: Too wordy or too terse - **Assumptions**: Assuming user knowledge they don't have - **Missing context**: Users don't know what to do or why - **Tone mismatch**: Too formal, too casual, or inappropriate for situation 2. **Understand the context**: - Who's the audience? (Technical? General? First-time users?) - What's the user's mental state? (Stressed during error? Confident during success?) - What's the action? (What do we want users to do?) - What's the constraint? (Character limits? Space limitations?) **CRITICAL**: Clear copy helps users succeed. Unclear copy creates frustration, errors, and support tickets. ## Plan Copy Improvements Create a strategy for clearer communication: - **Primary message**: What's the ONE thing users need to know? - **Action needed**: What should users do next (if anything)? - **Tone**: How should this feel? (Helpful? Apologetic? Encouraging?) - **Constraints**: Length limits, brand voice, localization considerations **IMPORTANT**: Good UX writing is invisible. Users should understand immediately without noticing the words. ## Improve Copy Systematically Refine text across these common areas: ### Error Messages **Bad**: "Error 403: Forbidden" **Good**: "You don't have permission to view this page. Contact your admin for access." **Bad**: "Invalid input" **Good**: "Email addresses need an @ symbol. Try: [email protected]" **Principles**: - Explain what went wrong in plain language - Suggest how to fix it - Don't blame the user - Include examples when helpful - Link to help/support if applicable ### Form Labels & Instructions **Bad**: "DOB (MM/DD/YYYY)" **Good**: "Date of birth" (with placeholder showing format) **Bad**: "Enter value here" **Good**: "Your email address" or "Company name" **Principles**: - Use clear, specific labels (not generic placeholders) - Show format expectations with examples - Explain why you're asking (when not obvious) - Put instructions before the field, not after - Keep required field indicators clear ### Button & CTA Text **Bad**: "Click here" | "Submit" | "OK" **Good**: "Create account" | "Save changes" | "Got it, thanks" **Principles**: - Describe the action specifically - Use active voice (verb + noun) - Match user's mental model - Be specific ("Save" is better than "OK") ### Help Text & Tooltips **Bad**: "This is the username field" **Good**: "Choose a username. You can change this later in Settings." **Principles**: - Add value (don't just repeat the label) - Answer the implicit question ("What is this?" or "Why do you need this?") - Keep it brief but complete - Link to detailed docs if needed ### Empty States **Bad**: "No items" **Good**: "No projects yet. Create your first project to get started." **Principles**: - Explain why it's empty (if not obvious) - Show next action clearly - Make it welcoming, not dead-end ### Success Messages **Bad**: "Success" **Good**: "Settings saved! Your changes will take effect immediately." **Principles**: - Confirm what happened - Explain what happens next (if relevant) - Be brief but complete - Match the user's emotional moment (celebrate big wins) ### Loading States **Bad**: "Loading..." (for 30+ seconds) **Good**: "Analyzing your data... this usually takes 30-60 seconds" **Principles**: - Set expectations (how long?) - Explain what's happening (when it's not obvious) - Show progress when possible - Offer escape hatch if appropriate ("Cancel") ### Confirmation Dialogs **Bad**: "Are you sure?" **Good**: "Delete 'Project Alpha'? This can't be undone." **Principles**: - State the specific action - Explain consequences (especially for destructive actions) - Use clear button labels ("Delete project" not "Yes") - Don't overuse confirmations (only for risky actions) ### Navigation & Wayfinding **Bad**: Generic labels like "Items" | "Things" | "Stuff" **Good**: Specific labels like "Your projects" | "Team members" | "Settings" **Principles**: - Be specific and descriptive - Use language users understand (not internal jargon) - Make hierarchy clear - Consider information scent (breadcrumbs, current location) ## Apply Clarity Principles Every piece of copy should follow these rules: 1. **Be specific**: "Enter email" not "Enter value" 2. **Be concise**: Cut unnecessary words (but don't sacrifice clarity) 3. **Be active**: "Save changes" not "Changes will be saved" 4. **Be human**: "Oops, something went wrong" not "System error encountered" 5. **Be helpful**: Tell users what to do, not just what happened 6. **Be consistent**: Use same terms throughout (don't vary for variety) **NEVER**: - Use jargon without explanation - Blame users ("You made an error" → "This field is required") - Be vague ("Something went wrong" without explanation) - Use passive voice unnecessarily - Write overly long explanations (be concise) - Use humor for errors (be empathetic instead) - Assume technical knowledge - Vary terminology (pick one term and stick with it) - Repeat information (headers restating intros, redundant explanations) - Use placeholders as the only labels (they disappear when users type) ## Verify Improvements Test that copy improvements work: - **Comprehension**: Can users understand without context? - **Actionability**: Do users know what to do next? - **Brevity**: Is it as short as possible while remaining clear? - **Consistency**: Does it match terminology elsewhere? - **Tone**: Is it appropriate for the situation? Remember: You're a clarity expert with excellent communication skills. Write like you're explaining to a smart friend who's unfamiliar with the product. Be clear, be helpful, be human.
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.