cleaning-up-stale-feature-flags
Identify and clean up stale feature flags in a PostHog project. Use when the user wants to find unused, fully rolled out, or abandoned feature flags, review them for safety, and then disable or delete them. Covers staleness detection, dependency checking, and safe removal workflows.
What this skill does
# Cleaning up stale feature flags This skill guides you through finding feature flags that are no longer serving a purpose and safely removing them. ## When to use this skill - The user asks to clean up, audit, or review their feature flags - The user wants to find flags that are stale, unused, or fully rolled out - The user asks "which feature flags can I remove?" or similar - The user wants to reduce tech debt from old feature flags ## What makes a flag stale A feature flag is considered stale when it's no longer doing useful work. PostHog tracks this with two signals: 1. **Usage-based staleness**: The flag has `last_called_at` data, but hasn't been evaluated in 30+ days. This is the strongest signal — the SDKs are no longer checking this flag. 2. **Configuration-based staleness**: The flag has no usage data (`last_called_at` is null), is 30+ days old, and is 100% rolled out (boolean at 100% with no property filters, or a multivariate flag with one variant at 100%). A fully rolled out flag with no conditions is equivalent to a hardcoded value — it can be replaced by removing the flag check from code. Disabled flags (`active: false`) are not considered stale — they were intentionally turned off and may be kept for reactivation. ## Workflow ### 1. List stale flags Call `posthog:feature-flag-get-all` with `active: "STALE"`. This returns all stale flags in a single request — PostHog handles the staleness detection server-side using the criteria described above. ### 2. Assess each candidate For each stale flag, gather context before recommending action: **Check if it's tied to an experiment:** The `posthog:feature-flag-get-definition` tool returns an `experiment_set` field. If non-empty, the flag is used by an experiment — check the experiment status before touching it. **Check if other flags depend on it:** Feature flags can have dependencies (flag B only evaluates when flag A is true). The flag definition includes dependency information in its `filters`. Look for `flag_key` references in other flags' filter groups. **Check when it was last modified:** A flag last updated years ago with no recent calls is a stronger removal candidate than one updated last month with no calls (it might be newly deployed and waiting for a release). **Summarize for the user:** For each stale flag, present: - Flag key and description - Why it's considered stale (no calls in N days, or fully rolled out for N days) - Whether it's tied to experiments - When it was created and last modified - A recommended action (clean up from code and disable, or keep with explanation) ### 3. Generate code cleanup instructions Generate a cleanup prompt the user can run in their code editor or coding agent. The cleanup instructions must be tailored to each flag's rollout state, because the rollout state determines which code path to keep. This list also serves as the approval checklist — if the user says their code is already cleaned up, they review it and confirm which flags to disable. Classify each flag into one of three rollout states based on its definition: - **`fully_rolled_out`**: A boolean flag with a release condition at 100% rollout and no property filters, or a multivariate flag where one variant is at 100%. Record which variant was active (for multivariate flags). - **`not_rolled_out`**: All release conditions are at 0%, or the flag has no release conditions at all. - **`partial`**: Everything else — the flag had some targeting but wasn't fully rolled out or fully off. Then generate instructions following this structure: **For fully rolled out boolean flags** — remove the flag check but keep the enabled code path: ```text Search for: isFeatureEnabled, useFeatureFlag, getFeatureFlag, posthog.isFeatureEnabled, posthog.getFeatureFlag For flag "example-flag": - Remove the if-check, keep the body - If there is an else branch, remove the else branch entirely ``` **For fully rolled out multivariate flags** — keep only the winning variant's code: ```text For flag "example-flag" (keep variant: "winning-variant"): - For if/else chains: keep only the branch matching "winning-variant", remove the flag check - For switch statements: keep only the winning variant's case, remove the switch ``` **For not-rolled-out flags** — remove the entire flag check AND the enabled code path: ```text For flag "example-flag": - Remove the if-check AND its body (the feature was never active) - If there is an else branch, keep only the else body ``` **For partial rollout flags** — flag these for manual review: ```text For flag "example-flag": - This flag had a partial rollout — check the flag's intent to determine which code path to keep - Then remove the flag check ``` End the instructions with: "After cleanup, remove any dead code branches and unused imports." Present the full cleanup prompt in a copyable format so the user can paste it directly into Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, or any other AI code editor. ### 4. Disable flags after code changes are deployed **Never disable flags before the code changes are deployed.** Disabling a fully rolled out flag while code still checks it will cause that code path to stop working — a production regression. **Never disable flags without explicit user approval.** Always present the list and recommendations first, then ask which flags to act on. Present the user with both options and their tradeoffs: - **Disable** (`active: false`) via `posthog:update-feature-flag`: The flag stops being evaluated but the configuration is preserved. If something was missed in the code cleanup, re-enabling is instant. Recommended as the default. - **Delete** via `posthog:delete-feature-flag`: A soft-delete — the flag is marked as deleted but not physically removed. Keeps the flag list clean, but re-enabling requires recreating the flag. Better for flags the user is confident they'll never need again. Once the user has chosen and confirms their code changes are deployed, apply the chosen action one flag at a time. Confirm each action so it's easy to stop if something goes wrong. ## Example interaction ```text User: "Can you help me clean up our stale feature flags?" Agent steps: - Call posthog:feature-flag-get-all with active: "STALE" to get all stale flags in one request - For each stale flag, call posthog:feature-flag-get-definition to check experiment_set and dependencies - Present findings: "I found 7 stale feature flags in your project: | Flag | Last called | Reason | Recommendation | |------|-------------|--------|----------------| | old-checkout-flow | 45 days ago | No evaluations in 45 days | Clean up and disable | | beta-dashboard-v2 | Never | 100% rolled out, created 3 months ago | Clean up and disable | | holiday-promo-2024 | 90 days ago | No evaluations in 90 days | Clean up and disable | | new-pricing-page | 60 days ago | No evaluations in 60 days, tied to experiment #42 | Check experiment first | ... Want me to generate cleanup instructions for any of these? I'd recommend starting with old-checkout-flow and beta-dashboard-v2 since they have no dependencies." - User confirms: "Yes, do old-checkout-flow and beta-dashboard-v2" - Classify rollout states from the flag definitions: - old-checkout-flow: fully_rolled_out (boolean, 100% rollout, no conditions) - beta-dashboard-v2: fully_rolled_out (boolean, 100% rollout, no conditions) - Generate and present cleanup prompt: "Here's a cleanup prompt you can paste into your code editor: --- Find and remove all references to these feature flags in the codebase. For each flag, search for all usages: isFeatureEnabled, useFeatureFlag, getFeatureFlag, posthog.isFeatureEnabled, posthog.getFeatureFlag, etc. ## Flags that were rolled out to 100% These flags were fully rolled out. Remove the flag check but KEEP the enabled code path. Boolean flags (remove the if-check, keep the body): - old-checkout-flow - beta-dashboard-v2
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.