clojure-review
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
What this skill does
# Clojure Code Review Skill @./../_shared/clojure-style-guide.md @./../_shared/clojure-commands.md ## Review guidelines **What to flag:** - Check compliance with the Metabase Clojure style guide (included above) - If `CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adoc` exists in the working directory, also check compliance with the community Clojure style guide - Flag all style guide violations **What NOT to post:** - Do not post comments congratulating someone for trivial changes or for following style guidelines - Do not post comments confirming things "look good" or telling them they did something correctly - Only post comments about style violations or potential issues Example bad code review comments to avoid: > This TODO comment is properly formatted with author and date - nice work! > Good addition of limit 1 to the query - this makes the test more efficient without changing its behavior. > The kondo ignore comment is appropriately placed here > Test name properly ends with -test as required by the style guide. **Special cases:** - Do not post comments about missing parentheses (these will be caught by the linter) ## Quick review checklist Use this to scan through changes efficiently: ### Naming - [ ] Descriptive names (no `tbl`, `zs'`) - [ ] Pure functions named as nouns describing their return value - [ ] `kebab-case` for all variables and functions - [ ] Side-effect functions end with `!` - [ ] No namespace-alias repetition in function names ### Documentation - [ ] Public vars in `src` or `enterprise/backend/src` have useful docstrings - [ ] Docstrings use Markdown conventions - [ ] References use `[[other-var]]` not backticks - [ ] `TODO` comments include author and date: `;; TODO (Name 1/1/25) -- description` ### Code Organization - [ ] Everything `^:private` unless used elsewhere - [ ] No `declare` when avoidable (public functions near end) - [ ] Functions under 20 lines when possible - [ ] No blank lines within definition forms (except pairwise constructs in `let`/`cond`) - [ ] Lines ≤ 120 characters ### Tests - [ ] Separate `deftest` forms for distinct test cases - [ ] Pure tests marked `^:parallel` - [ ] Test names end in `-test` or `-test-<number>` ### Modules - [ ] Correct module patterns (OSS: `metabase.<module>.*`, EE: `metabase-enterprise.<module>.*`) - [ ] API endpoints in `<module>.api` namespaces - [ ] Public API in `<module>.core` with Potemkin - [ ] No cheating module linters with `:clj-kondo/ignore [:metabase/modules]` ### REST API - [ ] Response schemas present (`:- <schema>`) - [ ] Query params use kebab-case, bodies use `snake_case` - [ ] Routes use singular nouns (e.g., `/api/dashboard/:id`) - [ ] `GET` has no side effects (except analytics) - [ ] Malli schemas detailed and complete - [ ] All new endpoints have tests ### MBQL - [ ] No raw MBQL manipulation outside `lib`, `lib-be`, or `query-processor` modules - [ ] Uses Lib and MBQL 5, not legacy MBQL ### Database - [ ] Model and table names are singular nouns - [ ] Uses `t2/select-one-fn` instead of selecting full rows for one column - [ ] Logic in Toucan methods, not helper functions ### Drivers - [ ] New multimethods documented in `docs/developers-guide/driver-changelog.md` - [ ] Passes `driver` argument to other driver methods (no hardcoded driver names) - [ ] Minimal logic in `read-column-thunk` ### Miscellaneous - [ ] Example data is bird-themed when possible - [ ] Kondo linter suppressions use proper format (not `#_:clj-kondo/ignore` keyword form) ## Pattern matching table Quick scan for common issues: | Pattern | Issue | | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | `calculate-age`, `get-user` | Pure functions should be nouns: `age`, `user` | | `update-db`, `save-model` | Missing `!` for side effects: `update-db!`, `save-model!` | | `snake_case_var` | Should use kebab-case | | Public var without docstring | Add docstring explaining purpose | | `;; TODO fix this` | Missing author/date: `;; TODO (Name 1/1/25) -- description` | | `(defn foo ...)` in namespace used elsewhere | Should be `(defn ^:private foo ...)` | | Function > 20 lines | Consider breaking up into smaller functions | | `/api/dashboards/:id` | Use singular: `/api/dashboard/:id` | | Query params with `snake_case` | Use kebab-case for query params | | New API endpoint without tests | Add tests for the endpoint | ## Feedback format examples **For style violations:** > This pure function should be named as a noun describing its return value. Consider `user` instead of `get-user`. **For missing documentation:** > This public var needs a docstring explaining its purpose, inputs, and outputs. **For organization issues:** > This function is only used in this namespace, so it should be marked `^:private`. **For API conventions:** > Query parameters should use kebab-case. Change `user_id` to `user-id`.
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.