cmd-pr-edgecase
Review branch changes for test gaps, logic edge cases, failure modes, and integration risks
What this skill does
# PR Edge Case Review Review branch changes for logic correctness. This skill finds what breaks, not what looks bad — use `cmd-sculpt-code` for code quality. ## Determine Scope **Default (no scope specified):** diff the current branch against the repo's base branch. Detect the base branch in order — stop at the first success: 1. `gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q '.defaultBranchRef.name' 2>/dev/null` 2. `git remote show origin 2>/dev/null | grep "HEAD branch" | cut -d: -f2 | xargs` 3. `git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@'` Do **not** assume `main` or `master`. If all methods fail, ask the user. Once resolved, run: ```bash git diff <base>...HEAD -- ":(exclude)*.lock" ":(exclude)package-lock.json" ":(exclude)pnpm-lock.yaml" ":(exclude)package.json" ``` **If the user specifies a scope**, use the corresponding command instead: | Scope | Command | What it covers | |---|---|---| | `unstaged` | `git diff HEAD -- <excludes>` | All uncommitted changes (staged + unstaged) | | `last commit` / `last 1 commit` | `git diff HEAD~1...HEAD -- <excludes>` | Changes in the most recent commit | | `last N commits` | `git diff HEAD~N...HEAD -- <excludes>` | Changes in the last N commits | | `entire repo` | `git ls-files \| grep -vE "\.(lock\|snap)$\|package-lock\.json\|pnpm-lock\.yaml"` | All tracked source files; no diff — apply all dimensions to the full current state of the codebase | For all diff commands, apply: `-- ":(exclude)*.lock" ":(exclude)package-lock.json" ":(exclude)pnpm-lock.yaml" ":(exclude)package.json"` ## Instructions 1. **Determine scope** using **Determine Scope** above — ask if still unclear after applying those rules. 2. **Read all changed files in full** before reviewing — understand the context around the diff, not just the changed lines. 3. **Review each dimension** below. For each finding, cite `file_path:line_number`. ## Dimensions ### 1. Test Gaps - New code paths without corresponding tests - Missing edge case coverage: empty inputs, zero values, nil/null, boundary values - Error paths that aren't tested (what happens when the DB call fails? the API returns 500?) - Testable helpers or utilities that lack unit tests - Existing tests that may be invalidated by the changes ### 2. Logic Simplification - Conditional branches that can be collapsed or are mutually exclusive - Defensive code that can't trigger (checking for nil after a constructor that never returns nil) - Redundant validation (checking the same condition at multiple layers) - Complex boolean expressions that could be a single predicate - Switch/match statements missing cases or with unreachable default branches ### 3. Edge Cases & Failure Modes - What happens with empty collections, zero-length strings, negative numbers? - Concurrent access: race conditions, double-submission, stale reads - Partial failures: what if step 2 of 3 fails? Is state left consistent? - Resource exhaustion: unbounded loops, unlimited retries, growing memory - Time-dependent behavior: timezone issues, DST, clock skew, expiry edge cases - Integer overflow, floating-point precision, string encoding issues - Off-by-one errors in loops, pagination, slicing ### 4. Integration Risks - Breaking changes to public APIs, function signatures, or data formats - Database migration safety: can it be rolled back? Does it lock tables? - Dependency version changes: breaking updates, deprecation warnings - Configuration changes that could affect other environments - Feature flags or environment checks that may behave differently in prod - Backward compatibility: will existing clients/callers still work? ## Output Format For each dimension, output: ``` ### [Dimension Name] - **[file:line]** — Finding description Risk: [what could go wrong] Suggestion: [how to address it] ``` If a dimension has no findings, output: `No issues found.` ## Final Summary End with: 1. **Top 3-5 risks** ranked by severity (what is most likely to cause a production incident?) 2. **Recommended test cases** to add before merging
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.