competitive-brief
Research competitors and generate a positioning and messaging comparison with content gaps, opportunities, and threats. Use when building sales battlecards, when finding positioning gaps and messaging angles competitors haven't claimed, or when a competitor makes a move and you need to assess the impact.
What this skill does
# Competitive Brief > If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md). Research competitors and generate a structured competitive analysis comparing positioning, messaging, content strategy, and market presence. ## Trigger User runs `/competitive-brief` or asks for a competitive analysis, competitor research, or market comparison. ## Inputs Gather the following from the user: 1. **Competitor name(s)** — one or more competitors to analyze (required) 2. **Your company/product context** (optional but recommended): - What you sell and to whom - Your positioning or value proposition - Key differentiators you want to highlight 3. **Focus areas** (optional — if not specified, cover all): - Messaging and positioning - Product and feature comparison - Content and thought leadership strategy - Recent announcements and news - Pricing and packaging (if publicly available) - Market presence and audience ## Research Process For each competitor, research using web search: 1. **Company website** — homepage messaging, product pages, about page, pricing page 2. **Recent news** — press releases, funding announcements, product launches, partnerships (last 6 months) 3. **Content strategy** — blog topics, resource types, social media presence, webinars, podcasts 4. **Review sites and comparisons** — third-party comparisons, analyst mentions, customer review themes 5. **Job postings** — hiring signals that indicate strategic direction (optional) ### Research Sources Gather intelligence from these categories of sources: #### Primary Sources (Direct from Competitor) - **Website**: homepage, product pages, pricing, about page, careers - **Blog and resource center**: content themes, publishing frequency, depth - **Social media profiles**: messaging, engagement, content strategy - **Product demos and free trials**: UX, features, onboarding experience - **Webinars and events**: topics, speakers, audience engagement - **Press releases and newsroom**: announcements, partnerships, milestones - **Job postings**: hiring signals that reveal strategic priorities (e.g., hiring for a new product line or market) #### Secondary Sources (Third-Party) - **Review sites**: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Product Hunt — customer sentiment themes - **Analyst reports**: Gartner, Forrester, IDC — market positioning and category placement - **News coverage**: TechCrunch, industry publications — funding, partnerships, narrative - **Social listening**: mentions, sentiment, share of voice across social platforms - **SEO tools**: keyword rankings, organic traffic estimates, content gaps - **Financial filings**: revenue, growth rate, investment areas (for public companies) - **Community forums**: community forums (e.g. Reddit, Discourse), industry chat groups (e.g. Slack communities) — user sentiment ### Research Cadence - **Deep competitive analysis**: quarterly (full research across all sources) - **Competitive monitoring**: monthly (scan for new announcements, content, messaging changes) - **Real-time alerts**: ongoing (set up alerts for competitor brand mentions, press, job postings) ## Competitive Brief Structure ### 1. Executive Summary - 2-3 sentence overview of the competitive landscape - Key takeaway: your biggest opportunity and biggest threat ### 2. Competitor Profiles For each competitor: #### Company Overview - What they do (one-sentence positioning) - Target audience - Company size/stage indicators (funding, employee count if available) - Key recent developments #### Messaging Analysis - Primary tagline or headline - Core value proposition - Key messaging themes (3-5) - Tone and voice characterization - How they describe the problem they solve #### Product/Solution Positioning - How they categorize their product - Key features they emphasize - Claimed differentiators - Pricing approach (if publicly available) #### Content Strategy - Blog frequency and topics - Content types produced (ebooks, webinars, case studies, tools) - Social media presence and engagement approach - Thought leadership themes - SEO strategy observations (what terms they appear to target) #### Strengths - What they do well - Where their messaging resonates - Competitive advantages #### Weaknesses - Gaps in their messaging or positioning - Areas where they are vulnerable - Customer complaints or criticism themes (from reviews) ### 3. Messaging Comparison Matrix | Dimension | Your Company | Competitor A | Competitor B | |-----------|-------------|--------------|--------------| | Primary tagline | ... | ... | ... | | Target buyer | ... | ... | ... | | Key differentiator | ... | ... | ... | | Tone/voice | ... | ... | ... | | Core value prop | ... | ... | ... | (Include user's company only if they provided their positioning context) ### 4. Content Gap Analysis - Topics your competitors cover that you do not (or vice versa) - Content formats they use that you could adopt - Keywords or themes they own vs. opportunities they have missed ### 5. Opportunities - Positioning gaps you can exploit - Messaging angles your competitors have not claimed - Audience segments they are underserving - Content or channel opportunities ### 6. Threats - Areas where competitors are strong and you are vulnerable - Trends that favor their positioning - Recent moves that could shift the market ### 7. Recommended Actions - 3-5 specific, actionable recommendations based on the analysis - Quick wins (things you can act on this week) - Strategic moves (longer-term positioning or content investments) ## Analysis Frameworks ### Messaging Comparison Frameworks #### Value Proposition Comparison For each competitor, document: - **Promise**: what they promise the customer will achieve - **Evidence**: how they prove the promise (data, testimonials, demos) - **Mechanism**: how their product delivers on the promise (the "how it works") - **Uniqueness**: what they claim only they can do #### Narrative Analysis Identify each competitor's story arc: - **Villain**: what problem or enemy they position against (status quo, legacy tools, complexity) - **Hero**: who is the hero in their story (the customer? the product? the team?) - **Transformation**: what before/after do they promise? - **Stakes**: what happens if you do not act? This reveals positioning strategy and emotional appeals. #### Messaging Strengths and Vulnerabilities For each competitor's messaging, assess: - **Clarity**: can a first-time visitor understand what they do in 5 seconds? - **Differentiation**: is their positioning distinct or generic? - **Proof**: do they back up claims with evidence? - **Consistency**: is messaging consistent across channels? - **Resonance**: does their messaging address real customer pain points? ### Content Gap Analysis Methodology #### Content Audit Comparison Map content across competitors by: | Topic/Theme | Your Content | Competitor A | Competitor B | Gap? | |-------------|-------------|--------------|--------------|------| | [Topic 1] | Blog post, ebook | Blog series, webinar | Nothing | Opportunity for B | | [Topic 2] | Nothing | Whitepaper | Blog post, video | Gap for you | | [Topic 3] | Case study | Nothing | Case study | Parity | #### Content Type Coverage | Content Format | You | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C | |----------------|-----|--------|--------|--------| | Blog posts | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Case studies | Y | Y | N | Y | | Ebooks/Whitepapers | N | Y | Y | N | | Webinars | Y | Y | Y | N | | Podcast | N | N | Y | N | | Video content | N | Y | Y | Y | | Interactive tools | N | N | N | Y | | Templates/Resources | Y | N | Y | N | #### Identifying Content Opportunities 1. **Topics they cover that you do not**: potential gaps in your content strategy 2. **Topics you cover that they do not**: potential differentiators to amplify 3. **Formats they use that you do not**: format gaps that could reach new audiences 4. **Audience se
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.