competitive-intel-agent
Use this skill to analyze competitors, find competitive gaps, and develop competitive strategy. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "competitive analysis", "analyze competitor", "competitive intel", "competitive intelligence", "competitive landscape", "competitor comparison", "beat competitor", "competitor weakness", "competitive advantage", "competitor research" Outputs: Competitive matrix, gap analysis, differentiation strategy, battlecards.
What this skill does
# Competitive Intel Agent
Analyze competitors and develop strategies to win against them.
**This skill uses 4 specialized agents** that analyze competitors from different angles, then synthesizes into actionable intelligence.
## What It Produces
| Output | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| **Competitive Matrix** | Feature-by-feature comparison |
| **SWOT Analysis** | Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats |
| **Gap Analysis** | Where you can differentiate |
| **Battlecard** | Quick reference for sales/marketing |
| **Strategy Recommendations** | How to position against each competitor |
| **Visual Charts** | Positioning matrix, feature comparison, pricing charts (optional) |
## Prerequisites
- Web access for research
- `GOOGLE_API_KEY` - For generating comparison charts (optional, uses image-generation skill)
## Workflow
### Step 1: Gather Requirements (REQUIRED)
⚠️ **DO NOT skip this step. Use interactive questioning — ask ONE question at a time.**
#### Question Flow
⚠️ **Use the `AskUserQuestion` tool for each question below.** Do not just print questions in your response — use the tool to create interactive prompts with the options shown.
**Q1: Product**
> "I'll analyze your competitive landscape! First — **what's your product or service?**
>
> *(What you offer)*"
*Wait for response.*
**Q2: Competitors**
> "Who are your **main competitors**?
>
> *(Company names or URLs — or say 'help me identify them' if unsure)*"
*Wait for response.*
**Q3: Aspects**
> "What **aspects** should I compare?
>
> - Features and capabilities
> - Pricing and packaging
> - Market position
> - All of the above
> - Or specify"
*Wait for response.*
**Q4: Goal**
> "What's your **goal** for this analysis?
>
> - Differentiate from competitors
> - Enter a new market
> - Win specific deals
> - Understand the landscape
> - Or describe"
*Wait for response.*
**Q5: Visuals**
> "Do you want me to **generate visual charts**?
>
> - 📊 Yes — positioning matrix, feature comparison, pricing charts
> - 📝 No — text and tables only"
*Wait for response.*
#### Quick Reference
| Question | Determines |
|----------|------------|
| Product | What we're positioning |
| Competitors | Who to research |
| Aspects | Depth of analysis |
| Goal | Framing and recommendations |
| Visuals | Whether to generate charts |
---
### Step 2: Run Specialized Analysis Agents in Parallel
Deploy 4 agents, each analyzing from a different perspective:
#### Agent 1: Feature Analyst
Focus: Product features and capabilities
```
Compare:
- Core features and functionality
- Feature depth vs breadth
- Unique capabilities
- Missing features
- Roadmap/recent launches
- Integrations and ecosystem
```
#### Agent 2: Pricing Analyst
Focus: Pricing and value proposition
```
Compare:
- Pricing models (subscription, usage, one-time)
- Price points and tiers
- Feature packaging
- Free tier/trial offerings
- Enterprise pricing
- Total cost of ownership
```
#### Agent 3: Positioning Analyst
Focus: Brand positioning and messaging
```
Compare:
- Target audience claims
- Key messaging themes
- Brand personality
- Thought leadership
- Customer testimonials
- Marketing channels
```
#### Agent 4: Market Position Analyst
Focus: Market share and business health
```
Compare:
- Estimated market share
- Company size/funding
- Growth trajectory
- Customer base
- Partnerships
- Public perception
```
---
### Step 3: Synthesize into Competitive Intelligence
Combine all agent outputs into structured intelligence:
```json
{
"analysis_scope": {
"your_product": "Your product/service",
"competitors_analyzed": ["Competitor 1", "Competitor 2", "Competitor 3"],
"analysis_date": "2026-01-04"
},
"competitive_matrix": {
"features": {
"Feature Category 1": {
"your_product": "✅ Full",
"competitor_1": "✅ Full",
"competitor_2": "⚠️ Partial",
"competitor_3": "❌ None"
}
},
"pricing": {
"your_product": "$XX/mo",
"competitor_1": "$XX/mo",
"competitor_2": "$XX/mo"
}
},
"competitor_profiles": [
{
"name": "Competitor 1",
"website": "https://competitor1.com",
"positioning": "How they position themselves",
"target_audience": "Who they target",
"strengths": ["Strength 1", "Strength 2"],
"weaknesses": ["Weakness 1", "Weakness 2"],
"pricing": "$XX/mo for Pro tier",
"differentiator": "What makes them unique",
"threat_level": "High/Medium/Low"
}
],
"swot": {
"strengths": ["Your strength vs competitors"],
"weaknesses": ["Your weakness vs competitors"],
"opportunities": ["Gaps to exploit"],
"threats": ["Competitive threats to address"]
},
"gap_analysis": {
"underserved_segments": ["Segment competitors ignore"],
"missing_features": ["Features no one offers"],
"pricing_gaps": ["Price point opportunities"],
"positioning_gaps": ["Messaging white space"]
},
"battlecard": {
"competitor_1": {
"when_we_win": ["Scenario 1", "Scenario 2"],
"when_they_win": ["Scenario 1", "Scenario 2"],
"key_differentiators": ["What to emphasize"],
"objection_handling": {
"They're cheaper": "Response...",
"They have feature X": "Response..."
},
"landmines": ["Questions to ask that expose their weakness"]
}
},
"recommendations": {
"positioning": "How to position against the field",
"messaging": "Key messages to emphasize",
"features_to_build": ["Feature gaps to close"],
"segments_to_target": ["Where you can win"],
"pricing_strategy": "How to price competitively"
}
}
```
---
### Step 4: Generate Comparison Charts (If Requested)
If user wants visual charts, generate using the `image-generation` skill.
**Charts to generate:**
| Chart Type | Purpose | Example Prompt |
|------------|---------|----------------|
| **Positioning Matrix** | Show competitive landscape | "Competitive positioning 2x2 matrix, X-axis: Price (low to high), Y-axis: Features (basic to advanced), with company logos/names plotted, clean business style" |
| **Feature Comparison** | Compare capabilities | "Feature comparison chart, [Your Product] vs [Comp A] vs [Comp B], checkmarks and X marks, clean table visualization" |
| **Pricing Chart** | Compare price points | "Bar chart comparing pricing, [Products] on X-axis, price on Y-axis, professional business colors" |
| **Market Share** | Show market positions | "Pie chart showing market share, [Company names] with percentages, business presentation style" |
**Prompt template:**
```
Professional competitive analysis chart,
[CHART TYPE] showing [COMPETITORS],
[DATA TO VISUALIZE],
clean business presentation style,
professional colors,
easy to read labels
```
**Example generation:**
```bash
python3 ${SKILL_PATH}/skills/image-generation/scripts/gemini.py \
--prompt "Competitive positioning 2x2 matrix, X-axis labeled 'Price' from Low to High, Y-axis labeled 'Features' from Basic to Enterprise, showing Salesforce in top-right, HubSpot in middle, Pipedrive in bottom-left, clean business presentation style, professional blue colors, labeled quadrants" \
--aspect-ratio "16:9" \
--resolution "2K"
```
**Save files as:**
- `competitive_matrix.png` - 2x2 positioning matrix
- `feature_comparison.png` - Feature checkmark grid
- `pricing_comparison.png` - Pricing bar chart
---
### Step 5: Deliver Actionable Intelligence
**Delivery message (with charts):**
"✅ Competitive analysis complete!
**You vs [# competitors analyzed]**
**Your Biggest Advantage:** [Key differentiator]
**Biggest Threat:** [Competitor] because [reason]
**Best Opportunity:** [Gap or segment to exploit]
**Generated Charts:**
- competitive_matrix.png (positioning 2x2)
- feature_comparison.png
- pricing_comparison.png
**Quick Battlecard:**
- Against [Competitor 1]: Lead with [differentiator]
- Against [Competitor 2]: Emphasize [strength]
**Want me to:**
- Deep dive on any competitor?
-Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.