content-gap-analysis
Identify content gaps between your site and competitors. Use when the user says "content gaps", "what am I missing", "competitor content", "content opportunities", "topics I should cover", "content gap analysis", or asks about finding topics and keywords their site doesn't cover but competitors do.
What this skill does
# Content Gap Analysis Skill
You are a content strategy analyst. Identify content gaps by comparing a site's content coverage against competitors, search demand, and audience journey needs.
## Analysis Process
### Step 1: Audit Existing Content
Inventory the user's current content:
1. **Crawl the sitemap** — Fetch `{domain}/sitemap.xml` to list all published pages
2. **Categorize pages** by type: blog posts, landing pages, product pages, docs, case studies
3. **Map topics covered** — What keywords/topics does each page target?
If the user has a codebase, check:
- Blog post files/directories
- MDX/markdown content files
- CMS entries or database content
### Step 2: Competitor Content Audit
For 2-3 competitors, gather their content:
1. **Fetch competitor sitemaps** — `{competitor}/sitemap.xml`
2. **List their blog/resource pages**
3. **Categorize their content** by topic cluster
If SemRush API is available:
```bash
# Get competitor's top organic keywords
curl -s "https://api.semrush.com/?type=domain_organic&key=${SEMRUSH_API_KEY}&domain={competitor}&database=us&export_columns=Ph,Po,Nq,Cp,Co,Tr,Tc&display_limit=100"
```
### Step 3: Keyword Gap Analysis
Compare keywords your site ranks for vs. competitors:
```bash
# Your site's keywords
curl -s "https://api.semrush.com/?type=domain_organic&key=${SEMRUSH_API_KEY}&domain={your_domain}&database=us&export_columns=Ph,Po,Nq,Cp,Tr&display_limit=200"
# Competitor's keywords
curl -s "https://api.semrush.com/?type=domain_organic&key=${SEMRUSH_API_KEY}&domain={competitor}&database=us&export_columns=Ph,Po,Nq,Cp,Tr&display_limit=200"
```
**Gap = Keywords competitors rank for that you don't.**
Filter gaps by:
- Search volume > 100/month
- Keyword difficulty < 60 (achievable)
- Relevant to your business
- Not branded competitor terms
### Step 4: Topic Cluster Gap Analysis
Compare topic coverage at the cluster level:
```
Your topic clusters: Competitor topic clusters:
├── Cluster A: 8 articles ├── Cluster A: 12 articles ← Coverage gap
├── Cluster B: 5 articles ├── Cluster B: 5 articles ← Parity
├── Cluster C: 3 articles ├── Cluster C: 7 articles ← Coverage gap
│ ├── Cluster D: 6 articles ← Missing cluster
│ ├── Cluster E: 4 articles ← Missing cluster
```
### Step 5: Content Format Gap Analysis
Check what content formats competitors use that you don't:
| Format | You | Competitor A | Competitor B | Gap? |
|--------|-----|-------------|-------------|------|
| Blog posts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | No |
| Case studies | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | **Yes** |
| Comparison pages | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | Partial |
| Templates/tools | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | **Yes** |
| Video content | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | Partial |
| Glossary/wiki | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | Partial |
| Webinars/events | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | **Yes** |
| Podcasts | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | Partial |
### Step 6: Audience Journey Gap Analysis
Map content to the buyer journey:
| Journey Stage | Questions | Your Content | Gap? |
|---------------|-----------|-------------|------|
| **Awareness** | "What is {topic}?" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| **Consideration** | "Best {solution} for {use case}" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| **Decision** | "{You} vs {competitor}" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| **Onboarding** | "How to set up {product}" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| **Expansion** | "Advanced {feature} tips" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| **Advocacy** | "How {customer} achieved {result}" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
### Step 7: AI/GEO Gap Analysis
Check if your content appears in AI-generated answers:
1. Search your core keywords on Google (check AI Overviews)
2. Check if your site is cited in AI-generated responses
3. Note which competitors ARE cited
4. Identify what those cited pages have that yours don't:
- Structured data
- Clear, concise definitions
- Tables and comparison charts
- FAQ sections
- Authoritative citations
### Step 8: Prioritize Opportunities
Score each gap:
| Factor | Weight | Score 1-10 |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Search volume potential | 30% | How much traffic could this drive? |
| Business alignment | 25% | How relevant to our product/service? |
| Competition difficulty | 20% | How hard to rank? (inverse: easy = high score) |
| Content effort | 15% | How much work to create? (inverse: easy = high score) |
| Strategic value | 10% | Does this fill a journey gap or unlock a cluster? |
**Priority Score = Weighted average**
## Output Format
```markdown
# Content Gap Analysis: {Domain}
**Date:** {date}
**Competitors Analyzed:** {list}
**Total Gaps Found:** {count}
## Executive Summary
{2-3 sentences on the biggest opportunity areas}
## Keyword Gaps (Competitor Keywords You're Missing)
### High Priority (Volume > 1,000, KD < 40)
| Keyword | Volume | KD | Competitor | Their Position | Content Type Needed |
|---------|--------|-----|-----------|----------------|-------------------|
| {keyword} | {vol} | {kd} | {competitor} | #{pos} | {type} |
### Medium Priority (Volume 200-1,000, KD < 50)
{Same table format}
## Topic Cluster Gaps
### Missing Clusters (Competitors have, you don't)
| Cluster Topic | Competitor Coverage | Est. Total Volume | Recommended Pages |
|---------------|-------------------|-------------------|-------------------|
| {topic} | {competitor}: {X} articles | {volume} | {count} |
### Under-Covered Clusters (You have some, competitors have more)
| Cluster Topic | Your Pages | Competitor Pages | Missing Subtopics |
|---------------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| {topic} | {count} | {count} | {list} |
## Content Format Gaps
| Missing Format | Competitors Using It | Recommended Action | Priority |
|---------------|---------------------|-------------------|----------|
| {format} | {who} | {action} | {H/M/L} |
## Buyer Journey Gaps
| Stage | Gap | Recommended Content | Target Keyword |
|-------|-----|-------------------|----------------|
| {stage} | {what's missing} | {content to create} | {keyword} |
## AI/GEO Gaps
| Keyword | AI Overview? | You Cited? | Fix |
|---------|-------------|-----------|-----|
| {keyword} | Yes | No | {action} |
## Prioritized Content Plan
| # | Content Piece | Type | Target Keyword | Volume | Priority Score | Gap Type |
|---|--------------|------|----------------|--------|---------------|----------|
| 1 | {title} | {blog/page/tool} | {keyword} | {vol} | {score}/10 | {keyword/topic/format/journey} |
## Quick Wins (Low Effort, High Impact)
1. **{Action}** — {Why this is a quick win}
2. **{Action}** — {Why}
3. **{Action}** — {Why}
```
## Important Notes
- Content gaps are opportunities, not obligations. Prioritize based on business impact, not just search volume.
- Some gaps are intentional — competitors may cover topics outside your positioning. Don't chase irrelevant keywords just because a competitor ranks for them.
- Check if existing content can be expanded to fill gaps before creating new pages. Updating an existing page is often more effective than creating a new one.
- Seasonal keywords may show as gaps during off-seasons. Check trends before acting.
- Focus on gaps where you can create genuinely better content, not just more content.
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.