context-map
Scope the real change surface before editing. Use when planning a feature, bugfix, refactor, or review and you need a concrete map of likely touch points, dependencies, tests, and nearby risks.
What this skill does
# Context Map Build a task-focused map of the codebase before changing files. - Leverage native parallel subagent dispatch and 200k+ context windows where available. ## When to Use Use symptom -> action triggers: when one matches, apply this skill and verify with the protocol below. - A request spans more than one file and the impact is not obvious yet. - You need to identify the minimum safe edit set before implementation. - You are debugging a bug or regression and need to trace nearby code paths. - You want a review-quality summary of likely code, test, config, and documentation touch points. ## Core Workflow 1. Restate the change in one sentence. 2. Search for obvious entry points by feature name, route, symbol, command, or error text. 3. Expand outward into direct dependencies, tests, docs, config, schemas, and scripts. 4. Separate likely edit targets from read-only reference patterns. 5. Call out risk multipliers such as public APIs, migrations, auth, secrets, environment variables, or generated artifacts. 6. Produce a compact context map before implementation. ## Search Order ### 1. Primary Targets Look for the files most likely to hold the requested behavior: - route handlers, commands, services, jobs, or pages - components, helpers, validators, and serializers - feature-specific configs, manifests, templates, and generated sources ### 2. Direct Dependencies Trace the files that import, export, call, or configure the primary targets: - imports and exports - DI registration and factory wiring - schema or model definitions - build or deployment hooks ### 3. Verification Surface Find the evidence paths that should move with the change: - unit, integration, E2E, and snapshot tests - fixtures, golden files, and sample payloads - README, usage docs, changelogs, and migration notes ### 4. Reference Patterns Find nearby examples that show the house style for the same kind of work: - similar endpoints or handlers - related UI components - existing test patterns - prior migrations or config changes ## Output Format Use this structure unless the user asked for a different format: ```markdown ## Context Map ### Likely Edit Targets | File | Why it matters | Expected change | |------|----------------|-----------------| | path/to/file | Main entry point | Update logic | ### Nearby Dependencies | File | Relationship | |------|--------------| | path/to/file | Imported by the main target | ### Verification Files | File | Coverage | |------|----------| | path/to/test | Existing tests for the feature | ### Reference Patterns | File | Pattern to reuse | |------|------------------| | path/to/example | Similar implementation shape | ### Risks - Public API or contract may change - Config, env vars, or generated files may need updates - Docs or changelog may need to move with the code ``` ## Heuristics - Prefer the smallest edit set that can fully implement the task. - Include tests and docs whenever the behavior or setup might move. - Treat migrations, auth, secrets, caching, build scripts, and generated artifacts as high-risk neighbors. - If multiple subsystems are involved, split the map by subsystem instead of producing one giant table. - Revise the map after discovery if the real scope is materially different from the initial request. ## Anti-Patterns - Delegating or evaluating without a scoped success condition: The output becomes hard to review and easy to overbuild. - Skipping the evidence step: A workflow that cannot be re-checked quickly is not ready for handoff. - Bundling unrelated subtasks together: It creates noisy prompts, weaker ownership, and avoidable integration risk. ## Verification Protocol Before claiming "skill applied successfully": 1. Pass/fail: The Context Map workflow names the agent boundary, delegated scope, and expected return artifact. 2. Pass/fail: Context passed to helpers is minimal, task-local, and free of hidden expected answers. 3. Pass/fail: Results are integrated only after evidence, diffs, or citations are checked by the controller. 4. Pressure-test scenario: Run the workflow on two similar tasks that must not share assumptions or leaked context. 5. Success metric: Zero context leakage; every delegated output is independently reviewable. ## Scripts And References - [Context Map Template](./references/context-map-template.md) - [Context Map Builder](./scripts/build-context-map.py) <!-- PORTABILITY:START --> ## Cross-Client Portability This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI. - GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill or plugin path, or wrap the workflow as project instructions if the host does not support portable skill folders directly. - Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin or marketplace source. - Codex: install or sync the folder into `$CODEX_HOME/skills/<skill-name>` and restart Codex after major changes. - Gemini CLI: this repository generates a project command named `/skills:context-map` from this skill. Rebuild commands with `python scripts/export-gemini-skill.py context-map` and then run `/commands reload` inside Gemini CLI. <!-- PORTABILITY:END --> <!-- MCP:START --> ## MCP Availability And Fallback Preferred MCP Server: None required - Fallback prompt: "Use the Context Map skill without MCP. Rely on the local `SKILL.md`, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding." - If the current host does not expose a matching server, use the bundled references, scripts, native toolchain, and manual workflow already described in this skill. - Treat direct local verification, rendered output, logs, tests, or screenshots as the fallback evidence path before completion. <!-- MCP:END --> ## Related Skills - [agent-task-mapping](../agent-task-mapping/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs task-to-agent routing decisions. - [custom-agent-usage](../custom-agent-usage/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs loading and invoking custom agent definitions safely. - [subagent-delegation](../subagent-delegation/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs safe, scoped delegation to helper agents. - [subagent-driven-development](../subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md): Use it when the workflow also needs plan-driven implementation with reviewer loops.
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.