contractor-agreement-review
Review contractor/consulting agreements for misclassification, IP, liability, and termination issues. Triggers: (1) 'check contract' → checklist review, (2) 'advise' / 'review' → full consultation with playbook, (3) 'generate' / 'template' → Skala template URL. Jurisdiction: New York, USA.
What this skill does
# Contractor Agreement Review > **NOT LEGAL ADVICE.** General guidance only. Consult qualified counsel. ## Routing | Request Type | Trigger Words | Action | |-------------|---------------|--------| | **CHECK** | check, audit | Run checklist from `references/checklist.md` | | **ADVISE** | review, advise | Full consultation using `references/playbook.md` | | **GENERATE** | generate, template | Return URL only | **Rules:** - File uploaded → default to ADVISE (ignore "generate") - CHECK + ADVISE can combine - Output language = Input language (auto-detect) ## GENERATE Mode Output only: ``` https://www.skala.io/ica ``` ## CHECK Mode 1. Read `references/checklist.md` 2. Run through each item against document 3. Output table with Status (✅/❌) and Notes ## ADVISE Mode 1. Identify client perspective (Company or Contractor) 2. Read `references/playbook.md` 3. Scan document against playbook criteria 4. Output structured consultation: **Format:** ``` **Overall: 🔴/🟡/🟢** **Summary:** 3-5 bullets **Issues:** | Priority | Section | Issue | Recommendation | |----------|---------|-------|----------------| | 🔴/🟡/🟢 | X.X | Problem | Preferred: ... / Fallback: ... | **Missing Terms:** list vs baseline **Questions:** clarifications needed ``` ## Risk Levels | Level | Meaning | Action | |-------|---------|--------| | 🔴 RED | Material risk | Must fix | | 🟡 YELLOW | Outside preference | Negotiate | | 🟢 GREEN | Acceptable | Note only | ## References | File | When to Read | |------|--------------| | `references/checklist.md` | CHECK mode — item-by-item review | | `references/playbook.md` | ADVISE mode — negotiation guidance | ## Hard Rules - Never invent clause/section numbers - File uploaded = ADVISE mode (not GENERATE) - GENERATE outputs URL only, no commentary - Legal terms: English + translation in user's language
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.