cucumber-gherkin
BDD testing with Cucumber and Gherkin for Ruby and Rails applications. Use when writing feature files (.feature), step definitions, hooks, or implementing Behaviour-Driven Development in Ruby/Rails projects. Covers Gherkin keywords (Feature, Scenario, Given/When/Then, Background, Scenario Outline, Rule), Ruby step definition patterns, Cucumber Expressions, hooks (Before/After/BeforeAll/AfterAll), tags, data tables, doc strings, World modules, and Capybara integration. Triggers on cucumber, gherkin, BDD, feature files, step definitions, acceptance testing, executable specifications.
What this skill does
# Cucumber & Gherkin
BDD testing framework with plain-text executable specifications and Ruby step definitions.
```
Feature file (.feature) ──> Step Definitions (Ruby) ──> System under test
```
## Gherkin Quick Reference
```gherkin
Feature: Short description
Optional multi-line description.
Background:
Given common setup for all scenarios
Rule: Business rule grouping (Gherkin 6+)
Scenario: Concrete example
Given an initial context
When an action occurs
Then expected outcome
And additional assertion
But negative assertion
Scenario Outline: Parameterized
Given there are <start> items
When I remove <remove> items
Then I should have <remaining> items
Examples:
| start | remove | remaining |
| 12 | 5 | 7 |
| 20 | 5 | 15 |
```
**Step keywords:** `Given` (setup), `When` (action), `Then` (assertion), `And`/`But` (continuation), `*` (bullet)
**Data tables:**
```gherkin
Given the following users exist:
| name | email | role |
| Alice | [email protected] | admin |
```
**Doc strings:**
```gherkin
Given a blog post with content:
"""markdown
# My Post Title
Content here.
"""
```
**Tags:** `@smoke @critical` on Feature/Rule/Scenario/Examples. Expressions: `@smoke and not @slow`, `(@smoke or @critical) and not @wip`
## Ruby Step Definitions
```ruby
# Cucumber Expressions (preferred)
Given('I have {int} cucumbers in my belly') do |count|
@belly = Belly.new
@belly.eat(count)
end
When('I wait {int} hour(s)') do |hours|
@belly.wait(hours)
end
Then('my belly should growl') do
expect(@belly.growling?).to be true
end
# Data table
Given('the following users exist:') do |table|
table.hashes.each { |row| User.create!(row) }
end
# Doc string
Given('a JSON payload:') do |json|
@payload = JSON.parse(json)
end
```
**Cucumber Expressions:** `{int}`, `{float}`, `{word}`, `{string}`, `{}` (anonymous). Optional: `cucumber(s)`. Alternatives: `color/colour`.
**State sharing:** Use instance variables (`@user`) or World modules:
```ruby
module MyWorld
def current_user
@current_user ||= create(:user)
end
end
World(MyWorld)
```
## Hooks
```ruby
Before do |scenario|
@browser = Browser.new
end
After do |scenario|
save_screenshot("failure.png") if scenario.failed?
end
Before('@database') do
DatabaseCleaner.start
end
After('@database') do
DatabaseCleaner.clean
end
BeforeAll do
# once before any scenario
end
AfterAll do
# once after all scenarios
end
```
**Order:** `BeforeAll` > (`Before` > Background > Steps > `After`) per scenario > `AfterAll`
## Running
```bash
bundle exec cucumber
cucumber --tags "@smoke and not @wip"
cucumber features/login.feature:10
cucumber --dry-run
cucumber --format html --out report.html
bundle exec parallel_cucumber features/
```
## Best Practices
**Declarative over imperative:**
```gherkin
# Good # Avoid
When "Bob" logs in When I visit "/login"
Then he sees his dashboard And I enter "bob" in "username"
And I click "Login"
```
- Describe *what* the system does, not *how*
- One behavior per scenario, 3-5 steps
- Keep Background short (≤4 lines), essential context only
- Use domain language stakeholders understand
## References
For comprehensive details:
- `references/gherkin-syntax.md` — Complete Gherkin language reference (keywords, data tables, tags, i18n)
- `references/step-definitions.md` — Ruby step definition patterns (data tables, doc strings, custom parameter types, World context, organization)
- `references/hooks-config.md` — Hooks, cucumber.yml configuration, reporters, Capybara integration
- `references/best-practices.md` — Anti-patterns, naming conventions, collaboration patterns, refactoring
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.