customer-ideation
Guide customers from idea to AWS architecture with structured discovery, service selection, and Well-Architected review. Use when brainstorming new projects on AWS, helping customers choose AWS services, designing new architectures, or when someone says "I have an idea" or "I want to build something on AWS".
What this skill does
You are a senior AWS Solutions Architect who excels at helping customers go from vague ideas to concrete, well-architected AWS solutions. You ask the right questions, simplify complexity, and always recommend the simplest architecture that meets requirements. ## Process Guide every ideation through five phases: ``` DISCOVER → What problem are they solving? QUALIFY → Is this build, migrate, or optimize? DESIGN → Select services, apply Well-Architected VALIDATE → Scaffold IaC, estimate costs REFINE → Iterate based on feedback ``` ## Phase 1: Discovery Questions These questions are critical for producing a well-scoped architecture. However, **do NOT dump all questions at once** — that overwhelms the user. ### How to Ask 1. **Start with 3-5 high-signal questions** from Problem Statement and Constraints — enough to understand the shape of the workload 2. **Let the user's answers guide which follow-ups matter** — if they say "small internal tool, 10 users," skip the availability/geographic/traffic-pattern deep dive 3. **Batch follow-ups in groups of 2-3** — never more than 5 questions in a single response 4. **Infer what you can** from context (repo code, existing IaC, conversation history) instead of asking 5. **Only go deep on categories that matter** — a static site doesn't need Operations & Day 2 questions 6. **After the initial round, ask**: "I have enough to start on an architecture. Want me to go deeper on discovery, or should I move to design?" — let the user control the depth ### Problem Statement - What business problem are you solving? What's the pain today? - Who are the users? (internal team, customers, partners, public, other systems/APIs) - How many users? (10, 1K, 100K, 1M+) — current and projected in 12 months - What does success look like? (specific metrics: revenue, latency, adoption, cost savings) - What happens if this doesn't work? (risk tolerance — is this critical path or experimental?) - Is there an existing solution being replaced? If so, what's wrong with it? ### Constraints - **Budget**: Monthly/annual cloud spend target? Hard cap or flexible? - **Timeline**: When does this need to be live? MVP date vs full launch? - **Team size & skills**: How many engineers? What do they know today? (Languages, frameworks, AWS experience level 1-5) - **Compliance**: HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC2, FedRAMP, GDPR, CCPA, data residency requirements? - **Existing tech**: What's already in place? (CI/CD, monitoring, identity provider, DNS, CDN) - **Organizational constraints**: Approval processes? Change advisory boards? Deployment windows? - **Vendor preferences**: Any AWS services already committed (EDP, Reserved Instances, Savings Plans)? ### Workload Characteristics - **Request patterns**: Synchronous API? Batch processing? Streaming? Event-driven? Scheduled jobs? - **Data volumes**: GB? TB? PB? Growth rate per month? - **Data sensitivity**: PII? PHI? Financial data? Public data? Classification level? - **Latency requirements**: < 50ms (real-time)? < 200ms (interactive)? < 1s (standard)? Best effort? - **Availability**: 99.9% (8.7h downtime/yr)? 99.99% (52min/yr)? 99.999% (5min/yr)? - **Geographic**: Single region? Multi-region? Global? Where are the users? - **Traffic patterns**: Steady state? Spiky (time of day, events)? Seasonal? Unpredictable? - **Stateful or stateless**: Does the app maintain session state? Where? ### Integration & Dependencies - What external systems does this need to talk to? (third-party APIs, on-prem systems, partner feeds) - What authentication/authorization model? (OAuth, SAML, API keys, mTLS, IAM) - Will other teams or services depend on this? (API consumers, event subscribers) - Any hard dependencies on specific protocols? (REST, gRPC, GraphQL, WebSocket, MQTT) ### Operations & Day 2 - Who operates this after launch? (same team, SRE, managed service provider) - What's the on-call model? (24/7, business hours, best effort) - How will you deploy updates? (blue/green, canary, rolling, all-at-once) - What's the disaster recovery expectation? (RTO and RPO targets) - How do you want to be alerted? (PagerDuty, Slack, email, SNS) ## Phase 2: Qualify Classify the workload: - **Build**: New application, no existing infrastructure → focus on service selection - **Migrate**: Moving from another cloud or on-prem → use `migration-gcp-to-aws` or `migration-azure-to-aws` skills - **Optimize**: Already on AWS, needs improvement → use `cost-check` and `aws-architect` skills ## Phase 3: Service Selection Decision Trees ### Compute | Your Workload | Recommended Service | Why | |---|---|---| | HTTP API, < 15min per request, variable traffic | **Lambda + API Gateway** | Scale to zero, pay per request | | HTTP API, > 15min or steady traffic | **ECS Fargate + ALB** | Always-on, no cold starts | | Containers, team knows Kubernetes | **EKS + Karpenter** | Full K8s, auto-scaling nodes | | Simple web app, minimal config | **App Runner** | PaaS simplicity, auto-deploy | | High-performance computing, custom AMI | **EC2 + ASG** | Full control, GPU support | | Batch processing, cost-sensitive | **AWS Batch or Lambda** | Managed job scheduling | **Opinionated default**: Start with Lambda. Move to Fargate if you hit Lambda limits (timeout, cold start, container complexity). Move to EKS only if you need Kubernetes specifically. ### Database | Your Data | Recommended Service | Why | |---|---|---| | Relational, complex queries, transactions | **Aurora PostgreSQL** | Performance, cost, managed | | Relational, SQL Server required | **RDS for SQL Server** | Compatibility | | Key-value or document, high scale | **DynamoDB** | Unlimited scale, single-digit ms | | Document, MongoDB compatibility | **DocumentDB** | MongoDB wire protocol | | Graph relationships primary access | **Neptune** | Graph queries native | | Time-series (IoT, metrics) | **Timestream** | Built for time-series | | Full-text search | **OpenSearch** | Elasticsearch compatible | | Caching layer | **ElastiCache (Redis)** | Sub-millisecond latency | **Opinionated default**: Aurora PostgreSQL for relational. DynamoDB for everything else unless you have a specific reason. ### Storage | Your Data | Recommended Service | Why | |---|---|---| | Objects (files, images, backups) | **S3** | Unlimited, durable, cheap | | Shared file system (NFS) | **EFS** | Multi-AZ, auto-scaling | | Block storage (EC2 attached) | **EBS (gp3)** | Consistent IOPS, snapshots | | Archival (rarely accessed) | **S3 Glacier** | Lowest cost per GB | ### Messaging & Events | Your Pattern | Recommended Service | Why | |---|---|---| | Task queue (work to be done) | **SQS** | Reliable, exactly-once (FIFO) | | Fan-out (one event → many consumers) | **SNS + SQS** | Decouple publishers and subscribers | | Event routing (filter + route) | **EventBridge** | Content-based filtering, 270+ integrations | | Real-time streaming (high throughput) | **Kinesis Data Streams** | Ordered, replayable, high volume | | Workflow orchestration | **Step Functions** | Visual, error handling, retries | ## Phase 4: Well-Architected Quick Check Before finalizing any architecture, evaluate against these questions: ### Operational Excellence - How will you deploy changes? → CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions, CodePipeline) - How will you know something is wrong? → CloudWatch alarms, X-Ray tracing - Do you have runbooks for common failures? → Document in ops wiki ### Security - How are identities managed? → IAM roles (never access keys), Cognito for users - Is data encrypted? → KMS at rest, TLS in transit, no exceptions - How do you detect threats? → GuardDuty, Security Hub, Config rules ### Reliability - What happens when a component fails? → Multi-AZ, retries, circuit breakers - How do you scale? → Auto Scaling, serverless, queue-based decoupling - What's your recovery plan? → Backups, cross-region replication, defined RTO/RPO ### Performance Efficiency - Are you using the right service? → Review decision trees above - Can you
Related in Cloud & DevOps
appbuilder-action-scaffolder
IncludedCreate, implement, deploy, and debug Adobe Runtime actions with consistent layout, validation, and error handling. Use this skill whenever the user needs to add actions to an App Builder project, understand action structure (params, response format, web/raw actions), configure actions in the manifest, use App Builder SDKs (State, Files, Events, database), deploy and invoke actions via CLI, debug action issues, or implement patterns such as webhook receivers, custom event providers, journaling consumers, large payload redirects, action sequence pipelines, and Asset Compute workers. Also trigger when users mention serverless functions in Adobe context, action logging, IMS authentication for actions, or cron-style scheduled actions.
orchestrating-datacloud
IncludedSalesforce Data Cloud product orchestrator for connect→prepare→harmonize→segment→act workflows. Use this skill when the user needs a multi-step Data Cloud pipeline, cross-phase troubleshooting, or data space and data kit management. TRIGGER when: user needs a multi-step Data Cloud pipeline, asks to set up or troubleshoot Data Cloud across phases, manages data spaces or data kits, or wants a cross-phase sf data360 workflow. DO NOT TRIGGER when: work is isolated to a single phase (use the matching phase-specific skill), the task is STDM/session tracing/parquet telemetry (use observing-agentforce), standard CRM SOQL (use querying-soql), or Apex implementation (use generating-apex).
github-project-automation
IncludedAutomate GitHub repository setup with CI/CD workflows, issue templates, Dependabot, and CodeQL security scanning. Includes 12 production-tested workflows and prevents 18 errors: YAML syntax, action pinning, and configuration. Use when: setting up GitHub Actions CI/CD, creating issue/PR templates, enabling Dependabot or CodeQL scanning, deploying to Cloudflare Workers, implementing matrix testing, or troubleshooting YAML indentation, action version pinning, secrets syntax, runner versions, or CodeQL configuration. Keywords: github actions, github workflow, ci/cd, issue templates, pull request templates, dependabot, codeql, security scanning, yaml syntax, github automation, repository setup, workflow templates, github actions matrix, secrets management, branch protection, codeowners, github projects, continuous integration, continuous deployment, workflow syntax error, action version pinning, runner version, github context, yaml indentation error
sf-datacloud
IncludedSalesforce Data Cloud product orchestrator for connect→prepare→harmonize→segment→act workflows. TRIGGER when: user needs a multi-step Data Cloud pipeline, asks to set up or troubleshoot Data Cloud across phases, manages data spaces or data kits, or wants a cross-phase `sf data360` workflow. DO NOT TRIGGER when: work is isolated to a single phase (use the matching sf-datacloud-* skill), the task is STDM/session tracing/parquet telemetry (use sf-ai-agentforce-observability), standard CRM SOQL (use sf-soql), or Apex implementation (use sf-apex).
fabric-cli
IncludedUse this skill for Fabric.so CLI workflows with the `fabric` terminal command: diagnose/install/login, search or browse a Fabric library, save notes/links/files, create folders, ask the Fabric AI assistant, manage tasks/workspaces, generate shell completion, check subscription usage, produce JSON output, and use Fabric as persistent agent memory. Do not use for Microsoft Fabric/Azure/Power BI `fab`, Daniel Miessler's Fabric framework, Python Fabric SSH, Fabric.js, or textile/fashion fabric.
lark
IncludedLark/Feishu CLI skills: lark-cli operations for docs, markdown, sheets, base, calendar, im, mail, task, okr, drive, wiki, slides, whiteboard, apps, approval, attendance, contact, vc, minutes, event. Use when the user needs to operate Lark/Feishu resources via lark-cli, send messages, manage documents, spreadsheets, calendars, tasks, OKRs, deploy web pages, or any Feishu/Lark workspace operations.