dashboard-design
Use this skill first when the user wants to design or plan a dashboard, especially Vizro dashboards. Enforces a 3-step workflow (requirements, layout, visualization) before implementation. Activate when the user asks to create, design, or plan a dashboard. For implementation, use the dashboard-build skill after completing Steps 1-3.
What this skill does
# Designing Vizro Dashboards Structured **requirements → layout → visualization** workflow. ## Workflow execution Run Steps 1–3 in order; each step depends on the prior. Track progress: ``` Dashboard Development Progress: - [ ] Step 1: Understand Requirements (define end user, dashboard goals, document decisions) - [ ] Step 2: Design Layout & Interactions (wireframes, filter placement) - [ ] Step 3: Select Visualizations (chart types, KPIs; colors only if user asked) ``` **Interaction style**: When gathering requirements or making design decisions, ask focused questions and present **2–5 numbered options** so the user can choose quickly. Prefer using your client’s built-in multiple-choice or question UI to keep the interaction lightweight and clickable; if that isn’t available, use the same numbered format in plain text **Do not skip steps.** Handle partial context as follows: - User has data but no requirements → Start at Step 1 - User has requirements but no data → Ask for data or suggest sample data - User has wireframes → Validate Step 1 decisions, then proceed from Step 2 - User has visual designs/mockups → Validate Steps 1-2 decisions, then proceed from Step 3 - User asks to "just build it" → Explain value of steps, offer to streamline but not skip, ask for data or suggest sample data **For simple dashboards** (single page, less than 5 charts): Steps 1-3 can be abbreviated but not skipped entirely. --- ## Spec Files: Documenting Decisions IMPORTANT: Each step produces a spec file in the `spec/` directory to document reasoning, enable collaboration, and allow resumption in future sessions. Create the `spec/` directory at project start. --- ## Step 1: Understand Requirements **Goal**: Define WHAT information is presented and WHY it matters. ### Key Questions to Discuss 1. **Users**: Who are the end users of this dashboard? Per user type: What decisions do they need to make? What task/job do they need to accomplish? 1. **Goals**: What is the current problem to solve? What is the goal of this dashboard? 1. **Data**: What sources are available? What's the refresh frequency? 1. **Structure**: How many pages or views? What's the logical grouping? ### Design Principles - **Limit KPIs**: 5–9 primary metrics per page (7 ± 2 rule) - **Clear hierarchy**: Overview → Detail → Granular (max 3 levels) - **Persona-based**: Different users may need different views - **Decision-focused**: Every metric should inform a decision ### REQUIRED OUTPUT: spec/1_information_architecture.md Copy the template from [assets/1_information_architecture.md](assets/1_information_architecture.md) to `spec/1_information_architecture.md` at the project root, fill in the placeholders, and save it BEFORE proceeding to Step 2. ### Validation Checklist Before proceeding to Step 2: - [ ] Every page has a clear, distinct purpose - [ ] KPIs are measurable and actionable - [ ] Data sources are accessible - [ ] User has confirmed the structure **Detailed guidance**: See [information_architecture.md](references/information_architecture.md); **Anti-patterns**: See [common_mistakes.md](references/common_mistakes.md) section "Step 1: Requirements Mistakes" --- ## Step 2: Design Layout & Interactions **Goal**: Define HOW users navigate and explore data. ### Vizro Navigation Architecture ``` Tier 1: Global Navigation ├── Multi-page sidebar (automatic in Vizro) └── Page selection Tier 2: Page-level Controls └── Filters/Parameters in left collapsible sidebar Tier 3: Component-level ├── Container-specific filters/parameters ├── Cross-filter, cross-highlight interactions └── Export actions ``` ### Layout Strategy Load the **designing-vizro-layouts** skill for grid system, component sizing, filter placement, and selector rules. Use the [wireframe templates](references/wireframe_templates.md) when building ASCII wireframes for user approval. ### Interaction Design Beyond standard sidebar filters, Vizro supports advanced interactions where clicking a chart or table affects other components. Load the **wiring-vizro-actions** skill for the 6 named interaction patterns (Hierarchical Drill-Down, Single-Page Drill-Down, Comparison Spotlight, Multi-Dimensional Slice, Select & Explore, Data Export) with wireframes, spec entries, and code. All advanced interactions follow **Source → Control → Target**: a source component (Graph or AgGrid — the components that carry click-data) sets an intermediate control (Filter or Parameter, always with an explicit `id`), which updates data-bearing target components (Graph, AgGrid, Figure, Table). **Decision flow** — match data shape + user need to a pattern: ``` Hierarchy where detail needs its own page? → Pattern 1 (Hierarchical Drill-Down) Hierarchy where detail fits in a container? → Pattern 2 (Single-Page Drill-Down) Compare one entity vs many, keep context? → Pattern 3 (Comparison Spotlight) 2+ categorical dimensions, click one cell? → Pattern 4 (Multi-Dimensional Slice) Users need to download data? → Pattern 5 (Data Export) Otherwise → standard filters/parameters are sufficient ``` **When NOT to use advanced interactions**: view-only / executive dashboards, simple filtering needs (sidebar dropdown covers it), fewer than ~5 groups, or when you'd end up with more than 2 interaction patterns on a single page (becomes confusing). For each interaction, document: source component, source value (column or `"x"`/`"y"`), control id + type (Filter/Parameter), targets, visibility (`visible=False` for highlight patterns), and whether it crosses pages (`show_in_url=True`). See the **wiring-vizro-actions** skill for full templates. ### REQUIRED OUTPUT: spec/2_interaction_ux.md Copy the template from [assets/2_interaction_ux.md](assets/2_interaction_ux.md) to `spec/2_interaction_ux.md` at the project root, fill in the placeholders (including one ASCII wireframe per page), and save it BEFORE proceeding to Step 3. Delete the entire `## Interactions` section if standard filters/parameters suffice. ### Validation Checklist Before proceeding to Step 3: - [ ] Layout follows Vizro constraints - [ ] Filter placement is intentional and documented - [ ] User has been presented ASCII wireframes for every page and approved them - [ ] Each entry in `interactions:` maps to a named pattern from **wiring-vizro-actions** (or the absence of interactions is intentional) - [ ] User has confirmed the interaction flow **Anti-patterns**: See [common_mistakes.md](references/common_mistakes.md) section "Step 2: Layout & Interaction Mistakes" --- ## Step 3: Select Visualizations **Goal**: Choose appropriate chart types and establish visual consistency. ### Chart Types, Colors & KPIs Load the **selecting-vizro-charts** skill for chart selection, color strategy, anti-patterns, and KPI card rules. Key design decisions: - Match chart type to data question (bar for comparison, line for trends, pie only for 2–5 slices) - **Colors**: Do NOT include a `## Colors` section in the spec. Vizro assigns palettes automatically. Only include if the user explicitly requested custom colors in their message. - Use built-in `kpi_card` / `kpi_card_reference`; never rebuild as custom charts ### REQUIRED OUTPUT: spec/3_visual_design.md Copy the template from [assets/3_visual_design.md](assets/3_visual_design.md) to `spec/3_visual_design.md` at the project root, fill in the placeholders, and save it BEFORE proceeding to implementation (dashboard-build skill). Do **not** add a `## Colors` section unless the user explicitly asked for custom colors — Vizro assigns palettes automatically. ### Validation Checklist Before proceeding to implementation (dashboard-build skill): - [ ] Chart types match data types (no pie charts for time series) - [ ] No anti-patterns used - [ ] Custom chart needs are identified - [ ] A `## Colors` section is **absent** unless the user explicitly requested custom colors **Anti-patterns**: See [common_mistakes.md](reference
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.