deal-risk-scoring
Assess deal health and identify at-risk opportunities using engagement signals, stakeholder mapping, and velocity analysis
What this skill does
# Deal Risk Scoring > Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation. ## When to Use This Skill - Weekly deal reviews and pipeline scrubs - Before QBRs to identify problem deals - When deals stall or push close dates - Prioritizing manager coaching time - Allocating SE/executive resources ## Methodology Foundation Based on **Gong's Deal Intelligence research** and **Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture**, analyzing: - Engagement velocity (email, meeting frequency) - Stakeholder breadth (multi-threading) - Competitive signals - Timeline alignment - Champion strength ## What Claude Does vs What You Decide | Claude Does | You Decide | |-------------|------------| | Scores deals on risk factors | Which deals to save vs. let go | | Identifies missing elements | Resource allocation priorities | | Suggests intervention actions | Executive sponsor assignments | | Tracks velocity trends | Final stage/probability updates | | Flags competitive threats | Win strategy adjustments | ## What This Skill Does 1. **Multi-signal analysis** - Engagement, stakeholders, timeline, competition 2. **Risk scoring** - Green/Yellow/Red health status with reasons 3. **Gap identification** - Missing stakeholders, stalled stages, unclear next steps 4. **Action recommendations** - Specific interventions to reduce risk 5. **Trend tracking** - Velocity changes over time ## How to Use ``` Assess the risk for this deal: Deal: [Company Name] Value: $X Stage: [Current Stage] Close Date: [Target Date] Days in Stage: X Recent Activity: - [List emails, meetings, calls with dates] Stakeholders: - [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level] Competition: [Known competitors] Champion: [Name and strength assessment] ``` ## Instructions ### Step 1: Engagement Velocity Score (0-25 points) | Criteria | Points | |----------|--------| | Meeting in last 7 days | +10 | | Email response in last 3 days | +5 | | Multiple contacts engaged | +5 | | Prospect initiating contact | +5 | | No activity 14+ days | -15 | ### Step 2: Stakeholder Coverage Score (0-25 points) | Criteria | Points | |----------|--------| | Economic Buyer identified | +10 | | Champion confirmed | +10 | | Technical evaluator engaged | +5 | | Only 1 contact | -10 | | No C-level access | -5 | ### Step 3: Process Alignment Score (0-25 points) | Criteria | Points | |----------|--------| | Clear next step scheduled | +10 | | Mutual action plan agreed | +10 | | Decision timeline confirmed | +5 | | Close date pushed 2+ times | -15 | | No defined process | -10 | ### Step 4: Competitive Position Score (0-25 points) | Criteria | Points | |----------|--------| | No competition | +15 | | Differentiation clear | +10 | | Incumbent advantage | -10 | | Price pressure | -5 | | Unknown competitive status | -5 | ### Step 5: Calculate Total Risk Score | Score | Health | Action | |-------|--------|--------| | 75-100 | ๐ข Green | Monitor, standard process | | 50-74 | ๐ก Yellow | Intervention needed | | 25-49 | ๐ Orange | Escalate, major action | | 0-24 | ๐ด Red | Rescue or disqualify | ## Examples ### Example 1: At-Risk Enterprise Deal **Input:** ``` Deal: TechCorp Global Value: $250K ARR Stage: 3 - Proposal Close Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31) Days in Stage: 28 Recent Activity: - Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops) - Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response) - Jan 29: Called, voicemail - Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response) Stakeholders: - John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged) - No other contacts Competition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery Champion: John - went silent ``` **Output:** ``` ## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global ### Overall Score: 28/100 ๐ด RED - HIGH RISK ### Score Breakdown | Factor | Score | Issues | |--------|-------|--------| | Engagement | 0/25 | No response in 14+ days | | Stakeholders | 5/25 | Single-threaded, no EB | | Process | 5/25 | Pushed once, no clear next step | | Competition | 18/25 | Competitor known but not blocking | | **Total** | **28/100** | | ### Critical Risks 1. **๐ด Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days - Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor 2. **๐ด Single-Threaded** - No other relationships - If John is out, deal is dead 3. **๐ No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker - John may not have authority to close ### Recommended Actions **This Week:** 1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company? 2. Find another contact via LinkedIn/referral 3. Send "breakup email" to force response 4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval **If No Response by Friday:** - Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost - Free up forecast slot ### Red Flags to Watch - If proposal was forwarded to competitor - If budget was reallocated - If project was deprioritized ### Save Probability: 25% Without new contact access, this deal is likely lost. ``` ### Example 2: Healthy Deal Review **Input:** ``` Deal: GrowthCo Inc Value: $85K ARR Stage: 4 - Negotiation Close Date: Feb 15 Days in Stage: 7 Recent Activity: - Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees) - Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO - Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA - Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10 Stakeholders: - Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged) - Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive) - Legal team (reviewing contract) - 8 end users attended demo Competition: None identified Champion: Maria - actively selling internally ``` **Output:** ``` ## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc ### Overall Score: 88/100 ๐ข GREEN - HEALTHY ### Score Breakdown | Factor | Score | Status | |--------|-------|--------| | Engagement | 25/25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven | | Stakeholders | 23/25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed | | Process | 22/25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion | | Competition | 18/25 | No competition identified | | **Total** | **88/100** | | ### Strengths 1. **โ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged 2. **โ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent 3. **โ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions 4. **โ Champion active** - Maria driving internally ### Minor Risks 1. **๐ก Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers - Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines 2. **๐ก No competition confirmed** - May be unknown - Mitigation: Ask directly in next call ### Recommended Actions **Feb 10 Call Prep:** 1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues 2. Confirm decision process post-legal 3. Ask: "Is anyone else in consideration?" 4. Get verbal commit from Maria ### Close Probability: 85% Deal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction. ``` ## Skill Boundaries ### What This Skill Does Well - Objective risk scoring from available data - Identifying gaps in deal coverage - Prioritizing which deals need attention - Suggesting specific interventions ### What This Skill Cannot Do - Know information not provided (internal politics) - Predict competitor moves - Replace relationship judgment - Guarantee score accuracy with incomplete data ### When to Escalate to Human - Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment - Deals involving partnerships or M&A - Unusual contract structures - Competitive intelligence gathering ## Iteration Guide ### Follow-up Prompts - "What's the single most important action for this deal?" - "Compare risk scores for my top 5 deals." - "What questions should I ask in the next meeting?" - "Draft a re-engagement email for the silent champion." ### Refinement Cycle 1. Initial assessment โ Identify top risks 2. Take action โ Update activity log 3. Re-score โ Track improvement 4. Weekly review โ Trend analysis ## Checklists & Templates ### Deal Health Checklist - [ ] Champion identified and engaged this week - [ ] Economic Buyer met at least once - [ ] Next step scheduled within 7 days - [ ] Competition status known - [ ] Close date validated by prospect ### Risk Score Template ```markd
Related in General
modeling-omnistudio-epc-catalog
IncludedSalesforce Industries CME EPC product-modeling skill for Product2-based catalog creation. Use when creating EPC products, configuring product attributes, building offer bundles with Product Child Items, or reviewing EPC DataPack JSON metadata for product catalog changes. TRIGGER when: user creates or updates Product2 EPC records, AttributeAssignment payloads, AttributeMetadata/AttributeDefaultValues, Offer bundles, or ProductChildItem relationships. DO NOT TRIGGER when: designing OmniScripts/FlexCards/Integration Procedures (use building-omnistudio-omniscript, building-omnistudio-flexcard, or building-omnistudio-integration-procedure), implementing Apex business logic (use generating-apex), or troubleshooting deployment pipelines (use deploying-metadata).
relationship-science-coach
IncludedUse this skill for direct, practical adult relationship coaching: couples conflict, repair, trust, marriage, dating, flirting, attachment patterns, emotional connection, sex, desire differences, eroticism, kink negotiation, affection, love languages, breakups, and long-term passion. Draw on Gottman, EFT and Hold Me Tight, attachment science, modern sex research, Perel, Nagoski, Kerner, Schnarch, Love and Stosny, and flexible love-language tools. Be concrete and low-hedge. Redirect only for imminent danger, abuse, coercive control, minors, non-consent, self-harm, stalking, or medical/legal/psychiatric decisions.
building-sf-integrations
IncludedSalesforce integration architecture and runtime plumbing with 120-point scoring. Use this skill to set up Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, and Change Data Capture. TRIGGER when: user sets up Named Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callouts, Platform Events, CDC, or touches .namedCredential-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Connected App/OAuth config (use configuring-connected-apps), Apex-only logic (use generating-apex), or data import/export (use handling-sf-data).
venue-templates
IncludedAccess comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
let-fate-decide
IncludedDraws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over ask-questions-if-underspecified when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
net-ops
IncludedCross-platform network troubleshooting (Windows, macOS, Linux) via local or remote shell. Use for: DNS broken, can't resolve hostnames, nslookup/dig works but apps fail, NRPT, WFP, scutil, /etc/resolver, systemd-resolved, /etc/resolv.conf, NetworkManager, VPN DNS leak residue (ProtonVPN/Mullvad/WireGuard/AnyConnect), AV/firewall blocking DNS or DoH, Tailscale DNS interaction, intermittent connectivity, remote diagnostics over SSH.