deep-research
Comprehensive research framework that combines web search, content analysis, source verification, and iterative investigation to conduct in-depth research on any topic. Use when you need to perform thorough research with multiple sources, cross-validation, and structured findings.
What this skill does
# Deep Research Framework ## Overview The Deep Research skill provides a systematic approach to conducting thorough investigations on any topic. It combines multiple tools and methodologies to gather, analyze, verify, and synthesize information. ## Core Components ### 1. Research Planning - Define research objectives - Identify key questions - Establish search criteria - Determine validation requirements ### 2. Information Gathering - Multi-source web search - Content extraction from various formats - Source diversity verification - Temporal relevance assessment ### 3. Analysis & Synthesis - Cross-reference multiple sources - Identify patterns and contradictions - Evaluate source credibility - Organize findings systematically ### 4. Validation & Verification - Fact-checking against authoritative sources - Cross-validation of claims - Identify potential biases - Assess information reliability ## Research Workflow ### Phase 1: Initial Investigation 1. **Topic Analysis** - Clarify research scope - Identify key concepts and terms - Define specific questions to answer 2. **Broad Search** - Use `web_search` to identify major sources - Gather diverse perspectives - Map the landscape of available information 3. **Source Prioritization** - Rank sources by authority and relevance - Identify primary vs. secondary sources - Note publication dates and context ### Phase 2: Deep Dive 1. **Detailed Content Extraction** - Use `web_fetch` to retrieve full articles/pages - Extract key information systematically - Maintain source attribution 2. **Cross-Reference Analysis** - Compare claims across multiple sources - Identify agreements and disagreements - Note inconsistencies for further investigation 3. **Expert Sources** - Seek academic papers, expert opinions - Look for peer-reviewed sources - Identify recognized authorities on the topic ### Phase 3: Synthesis & Validation 1. **Pattern Recognition** - Identify consistent themes across sources - Highlight areas of disagreement - Note gaps in available information 2. **Fact Verification** - Cross-check claims against authoritative sources - Verify dates, statistics, and attributions - Identify potential misinformation 3. **Bias Assessment** - Evaluate source objectivity - Identify potential conflicts of interest - Consider temporal context of information ### Phase 4: Report Generation 1. **Structured Summary** - Executive summary of key findings - Detailed findings organized by theme - Supporting evidence for each claim 2. **Source Evaluation** - Assessment of source credibility - Identification of limitations - Confidence levels for different claims 3. **Remaining Questions** - Areas requiring further investigation - Conflicting information needing resolution - Gaps in current knowledge ## Tools Integration ### Web Research - `web_search`: Initial broad search to identify sources - `web_fetch`: Retrieve detailed content from specific URLs - `browser`: For complex sites or when web_fetch fails ### Content Processing - `read`: Process downloaded content or documents - `write`: Create structured research notes - `edit`: Refine and organize findings ### Memory & Organization - `memory_get` / `memory_search`: Reference previous research - `write`: Create persistent research records - Structured file organization for findings ## Research Quality Standards ### Source Diversity - Include multiple perspectives on controversial topics - Balance popular and academic sources - Include international viewpoints when relevant - Seek primary sources when possible ### Temporal Relevance - Prioritize recent information for fast-changing topics - Consider historical context for trend analysis - Note when information was published - Flag potentially outdated information ### Authority Assessment - Prioritize peer-reviewed academic sources - Consider author credentials and institutional affiliation - Check for potential conflicts of interest - Verify organizational reputation ## Iterative Research Approach ### Cycle 1: General Overview - Broad search to understand the topic landscape - Identify key terms, concepts, and stakeholders - Establish initial research questions ### Cycle 2: Focused Investigation - Targeted searches based on initial findings - Deep dive into specific aspects - Begin synthesis of information ### Cycle 3: Validation & Refinement - Verify key claims across multiple sources - Resolve contradictions - Refine understanding based on evidence ### Cycle 4: Synthesis & Reporting - Combine findings into coherent narrative - Identify remaining uncertainties - Prepare final research report ## Output Structure ### Research Report Template ``` # [Research Topic] - Deep Research Report ## Executive Summary [2-3 sentence summary of key findings] ## Research Questions [Specific questions investigated] ## Methodology [Description of research approach and tools used] ## Key Findings [Main discoveries organized by theme] ## Supporting Evidence [Evidence supporting each finding with sources] ## Contradictions/Debates [Areas of disagreement among sources] ## Source Credibility Assessment [Evaluation of information sources] ## Limitations [Identified limitations in research] ## Further Research Needed [Questions requiring additional investigation] ``` ## Use Cases ### Academic Research - Literature reviews - Topic exploration - Source verification ### Business Intelligence - Market analysis - Competitive research - Technology trends ### Fact Checking - Claim verification - Misinformation identification - Source credibility assessment ### Personal Learning - Deep topic exploration - Concept clarification - Question resolution ## Quality Assurance - Always verify critical claims against multiple sources - Flag information that seems unreliable - Maintain skepticism toward sensational claims - Prioritize authoritative sources over anonymous ones - Document all sources for verification purposes
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.