delegating-work
Create a Delegation Pack (delegation brief, decision rights, context handoff, check-in cadence, review plan, debrief). Use for delegation, letting go, empowering reports, and avoiding micromanagement.
What this skill does
# Delegating Work ## Scope **Covers** - Delegating a specific project/problem/decision to a direct report (or cross-functional owner) - Transferring **context without control** (clear outcomes + guardrails, not step-by-step instructions) - Setting **decision rights**, check-in cadence, and “in-the-details” quality reviews without micromanaging **When to use** - “Help me delegate this project/task to someone on my team.” - “I’m holding onto too much / I need to give away my Lego.” - “I’m worried I’m micromanaging—how do I stay in the details but empower ownership?” - “Draft a delegation brief + decision rights + check-in plan.” **When NOT to use** - The work is primarily a **performance problem** (use coaching/feedback workflows instead) - You need to decide *what* work to do (prioritization/scope first) - You lack a clear outcome, constraints, or success criteria (do a quick problem-definition first) ## Inputs **Minimum required** - The work item to delegate (project/problem/decision) + why now - Desired outcome (definition of done) + success metrics or acceptance criteria - Constraints/non-negotiables (timeline, budget, quality bar, policies, stakeholders) - Delegatee context (role, current load, experience level, growth goals if relevant) **Missing-info strategy** - Ask up to 5 questions from [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md). - If details are unavailable, proceed with explicit assumptions and label unknowns. ## Outputs (deliverables) Produce a **Delegation Pack** (Markdown in-chat, or files if requested) in this order: 1) **Delegation brief** (outcome, context, constraints, stakeholders, timeline) 2) **Decision rights + guardrails** (what they can decide, escalation triggers, review points) 3) **Context handoff pack** (links, background, “known gotchas”, example outputs) 4) **Execution cadence** (check-ins, update format, what “good” looks like) 5) **Review plan** (how to be in the details without telling them how to do it) 6) **Debrief plan** (learning capture + ownership updates) 7) **Risks / Open questions / Next steps** (always included) Templates: [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) ## Workflow (8 steps) ### 1) Frame the delegation decision - **Inputs:** Work item + why now; constraints. - **Actions:** Define the outcome, the “why” (business context), and what must not change (non-negotiables). Decide what “good” looks like. - **Outputs:** Draft Delegation Brief (top section). - **Checks:** The outcome is measurable/testable (someone can say “done” unambiguously). ### 2) Pick the owner + choose the autonomy level - **Inputs:** Candidate owner(s); their experience and growth goals. - **Actions:** Select the delegatee. Set an explicit autonomy level (e.g., “propose + I approve” vs “you decide, inform me”). Call out which parts are “on assignment” vs “high flexibility.” - **Outputs:** Owner + autonomy statement + boundaries. - **Checks:** Both of you can repeat: “What decisions are yours vs mine?” ### 3) Transfer context (not instructions) - **Inputs:** Background docs; prior decisions; stakeholders; constraints. - **Actions:** Provide full context so the owner can connect the dots. Share the “why”, the tradeoffs, and known pitfalls. Avoid prescribing the exact path. - **Outputs:** Context Handoff Pack. - **Checks:** Owner can explain the problem, constraints, and success criteria in their own words. ### 4) Define decision rights + guardrails - **Inputs:** Non-negotiables; risks; stakeholders. - **Actions:** Write decision rights, escalation triggers, and review points. Set “red lines” (quality, policy, safety, customer impact). - **Outputs:** Decision Rights + Guardrails. - **Checks:** Escalation triggers are specific (not “if it feels risky”). ### 5) Align on plan + milestones (owner-led) - **Inputs:** Draft Delegation Brief + guardrails. - **Actions:** Ask the owner to propose a plan, milestones, and tradeoffs. Act as a thought partner: ask questions instead of giving the answer. - **Outputs:** Milestone plan + first-week plan. - **Checks:** Plan has milestones tied to outcomes, not just activities. ### 6) Set the execution cadence - **Inputs:** Timeline; team routines; stakeholder needs. - **Actions:** Set check-in frequency, update format, and what you want to see (risks, decisions, asks). Establish how you’ll “refuse to rule” unless a trigger is hit. - **Outputs:** Cadence + Update Template. - **Checks:** Check-ins focus on outcomes/risks/decisions, not task-by-task status. ### 7) Review in the details without micromanaging - **Inputs:** Work artifacts; review points. - **Actions:** Review output quality via artifacts (docs, specs, results) and criteria. When the team is struggling with the *right* problems, step back. When it’s the wrong problem, intervene with clarity on outcome/guardrails. - **Outputs:** Review notes + decisions (approve/adjust/escalate). - **Checks:** Feedback is framed as “quality bar + constraints” (not “do it my way”). ### 8) Close the loop (debrief + “give away the Lego”) - **Inputs:** Final deliverable; what happened; learnings. - **Actions:** Debrief what worked/what didn’t, update ownership maps, and explicitly acknowledge the new owner. Capture improvements to templates/guardrails. - **Outputs:** Debrief notes + next delegation candidates. - **Checks:** Ownership is durable (not “it snaps back to you” after delivery). ## Quality gate (required) - Run [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and score with [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). - Always include: **Risks**, **Open questions**, **Next steps**. ## Examples **Example 1:** “Delegate discovery + recommendation for improving onboarding activation to my PM.” Expected: delegation brief, decision rights (what PM decides vs escalates), context pack (data + constraints), weekly cadence, review plan for the final recommendation doc. **Example 2:** “Delegate building a lightweight internal tool to an engineer, but I’m worried about security/compliance.” Expected: guardrails + escalation triggers, clear non-negotiables, review points for design + launch readiness, and a debrief plan. **Boundary example:** “Delegate ‘make the company strategy better.’” Response: require a narrower outcome (decision to support, artifacts, time box) before producing the Delegation Pack.
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.