design-documentation
Transform approved requirements into comprehensive technical designs. Define system architecture, component interactions, data models, and interfaces to create a blueprint for implementation.
What this skill does
# Design Documentation
Create technical blueprints that bridge requirements and implementation. This skill teaches how to document architecture decisions, component design, and system interactions.
## When to Use This Skill
Use design documentation when:
- Requirements phase is complete and approved
- You need to plan technical implementation
- Multiple developers will work on the feature
- Architecture decisions need documentation
- The feature involves complex integrations
## Design Document Structure
### Standard Template
```markdown
# Design Document: [Feature Name]
## Overview
[High-level summary of the feature and approach]
## Architecture
[System architecture and component overview]
## Components and Interfaces
[Detailed component descriptions and interactions]
## Data Models
[Data structures and relationships]
## Error Handling
[Error scenarios and response strategies]
## Testing Strategy
[Testing approach and quality assurance]
```
## Step-by-Step Process
### Step 1: Requirements Analysis
Before designing, ensure you understand:
- All functional requirements
- Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
- Constraints (technology stack, timeline, resources)
- Integration points with existing systems
**Analysis Questions:**
- What does the system need to do?
- What are the performance expectations?
- What existing code/systems does this touch?
- What are the security requirements?
- What could go wrong?
### Step 2: Research and Context Building
Identify areas needing research:
- Technology choices and alternatives
- Third-party integrations and APIs
- Best practices for similar systems
- Security and compliance considerations
**Research Documentation:**
```markdown
## Research Findings
### [Topic]
**Sources:** [Links/references]
**Key Insights:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
**Impact on Design:** [How this affects our approach]
```
### Step 3: Define System Architecture
Document the high-level structure:
```markdown
## Architecture
### System Overview
[How the overall system works]
### Component Architecture
[Major components and their responsibilities]
### Data Flow
[How information moves through the system]
### Technology Decisions
[Key technology choices and rationale]
```
**Architecture Diagram (Mermaid):**
```mermaid
graph TD
A[Client] --> B[API Gateway]
B --> C[Auth Service]
B --> D[Feature Service]
D --> E[Database]
D --> F[Cache]
```
### Step 4: Design Components and Interfaces
For each major component:
```markdown
## Components and Interfaces
### [Component Name]
**Purpose:** [What this component does]
**Responsibilities:**
- [Responsibility 1]
- [Responsibility 2]
**Interfaces:**
- Input: [What it receives]
- Output: [What it produces]
- Dependencies: [What it requires]
**API Definition:**
```typescript
interface ComponentName {
method(input: InputType): Promise<OutputType>;
}
```
```
### Step 5: Define Data Models
Document all data structures:
```markdown
## Data Models
### [Entity Name]
**Purpose:** [What this entity represents]
**Properties:**
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|-------|------|----------|-------------|
| id | string | Yes | Unique identifier |
| name | string | Yes | Display name |
| createdAt | Date | Yes | Creation timestamp |
**Validation Rules:**
- [Rule 1]
- [Rule 2]
**Relationships:**
- [Relationship to other entities]
**Example:**
```json
{
"id": "abc123",
"name": "Example",
"createdAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}
```
```
### Step 6: Plan Error Handling
Document error scenarios:
```markdown
## Error Handling
### Error Categories
1. **Validation Errors:** Invalid user input
2. **Authentication Errors:** Unauthorized access
3. **External Service Errors:** Third-party failures
4. **System Errors:** Internal failures
### Error Response Strategy
| Error Type | HTTP Code | User Message | System Action |
|------------|-----------|--------------|---------------|
| Validation | 400 | Specific field error | Log, return details |
| Auth | 401 | "Please log in" | Redirect to login |
| Not Found | 404 | "Resource not found" | Log, return error |
| Server | 500 | "Something went wrong" | Log, alert, retry |
### Recovery Mechanisms
- [Retry strategies]
- [Fallback behaviors]
- [Circuit breaker patterns]
```
### Step 7: Define Testing Strategy
```markdown
## Testing Strategy
### Unit Testing
- **Coverage Target:** 80%+
- **Focus Areas:** [Critical business logic]
- **Mocking Strategy:** [What to mock]
### Integration Testing
- **Scope:** [Component interactions to test]
- **Environment:** [Test environment setup]
- **Data Strategy:** [Test data approach]
### End-to-End Testing
- **Critical Paths:** [User journeys to test]
- **Tools:** [Testing tools]
### Performance Testing
- **Load Targets:** [Expected load]
- **Benchmarks:** [Performance requirements]
```
## Decision Documentation
Document key decisions using this template:
```markdown
### Decision: [Brief Title]
**Context:** [Situation requiring a decision]
**Options Considered:**
**Option 1: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]
**Option 2: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]
**Decision:** [Chosen option]
**Rationale:** [Why this option was selected]
**Implications:** [What this means for implementation]
```
## Common Design Decisions
### API Design
```markdown
### Decision: API Architecture
**Options:**
1. **REST API** - Standard HTTP methods, well-understood
2. **GraphQL** - Flexible queries, single endpoint
3. **RPC-style** - Direct operation mapping
**Decision:** REST API
**Rationale:** Standard CRUD operations, team familiarity, good tooling support
```
### Data Storage
```markdown
### Decision: Database Choice
**Options:**
1. **PostgreSQL** - ACID compliance, complex queries
2. **MongoDB** - Schema flexibility, horizontal scaling
3. **Redis** - High performance, limited queries
**Decision:** PostgreSQL with JSON columns
**Rationale:** Data consistency needs + flexibility for user preferences
```
### Authentication
```markdown
### Decision: Authentication Strategy
**Options:**
1. **Session-based** - Server-controlled, simple
2. **JWT tokens** - Stateless, scalable
3. **OAuth 2.0** - External provider, no password management
**Decision:** JWT with refresh token rotation
**Rationale:** Scalability requirements, API-first architecture
```
## Quality Checklist
Before finalizing design:
**Completeness:**
- [ ] All requirements addressed in design
- [ ] Major system components defined
- [ ] Data models cover all entities
- [ ] Error handling covers expected failures
- [ ] Testing strategy addresses all layers
**Clarity:**
- [ ] Design decisions clearly explained
- [ ] Component responsibilities well-defined
- [ ] Interfaces between components specified
- [ ] Technical choices include rationale
**Feasibility:**
- [ ] Design is technically achievable
- [ ] Performance requirements can be met
- [ ] Security requirements addressed
- [ ] Implementation complexity reasonable
**Traceability:**
- [ ] Design elements map to requirements
- [ ] All requirements covered by design
- [ ] Testing validates requirement fulfillment
## Common Pitfalls
1. **Over-Engineering:** Design for current requirements, not hypothetical futures
2. **Under-Specified Interfaces:** Define clear component boundaries
3. **Ignoring Non-Functional Requirements:** Address performance, security, scalability
4. **Technology-First Design:** Let requirements drive technology choices
5. **Insufficient Error Handling:** Plan for failures, not just happy paths
## Example: User Profile Design
```markdown
# Design Document: User Profile Management
## Overview
Enable users to view and edit their profile information, including personal details, preferences, and profile picture.
## Architecture
### Component Architecture
```
┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Client │────Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.