designing-surveys
Design and launch a product survey and produce a Survey Pack (brief, questionnaire/instrument, analysis plan, launch checklist, reporting outline). Use for customer surveys, onboarding surveys, NPS/CSAT/PMF, cancellation/churn, and feedback surveys.
What this skill does
# Designing Surveys ## Scope **Covers** - Designing product surveys that answer a specific decision (not “general feedback”) - Choosing the right audience, sampling, and timing (including “best customers” cohorts) - Writing clear, unbiased questions and using good scales (CSAT vs NPS guidance) - Building an instrument that works on mobile (logic, required fields, option visibility) - Planning analysis and turning results into decisions and follow-ups **When to use** - “Design a customer survey for…” - “Create an onboarding survey to profile users / separate buyer vs user.” - “We need a CSAT/NPS/PMF survey.” - “Draft a cancellation / churn survey.” - “Help me write survey questions and an analysis plan.” **When NOT to use** - You need deep “why” stories and context (use `conducting-user-interviews`) - You need to measure causal impact of a change (use an experiment/A/B test, not a survey) - Your reachable sample is extremely small (n < ~30) and you need directional insight → interviews may be better - The topic is high-risk (legal/medical/safety) or requires formal survey science review; involve an expert ## Inputs **Minimum required** - Product + target user(s)/segment(s) - The decision to make (what will change based on the survey) + deadline - Survey type (e.g., onboarding profiling, CSAT, NPS, PMF, churn, feature discovery) - Distribution channel(s) (in-product, email, customer success, etc.) + sampling constraints - Privacy/compliance constraints (what data you can/can’t collect) **Missing-info strategy** - Ask up to 5 questions from [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md). - If still missing, proceed with explicit assumptions and list **Open questions** that would change the design. ## Outputs (deliverables) Produce a **Survey Pack** in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if the user requests): 1) **Context snapshot** (decision, audience, channel, constraints) 2) **Survey brief** (goal, target population, sampling, timing, success criteria) 3) **Questionnaire** (questions with rationale + response types; question IDs) 4) **Survey instrument table** (copy/paste-ready for building in a survey tool) 5) **Analysis + reporting plan** (segments, cuts, coding plan, decision thresholds) 6) **Launch plan + QA checklist** (pilot, mobile QA, bias checks, comms, follow-ups) 7) **Risks / Open questions / Next steps** (always included) Templates: [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) Expanded heuristics: [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) ## Workflow (7 steps) ### 1) Intake + decision framing - **Inputs:** User context; [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md). - **Actions:** Clarify the decision, timeline, primary audience, and distribution channel(s). Name the “unknowns” the survey must resolve. - **Outputs:** Context snapshot + survey goal. - **Checks:** You can state the decision in one sentence (“We are deciding whether to… by <date>”). ### 2) Define the audience + sampling plan (who, when, how many) - **Inputs:** Context snapshot. - **Actions:** Choose primary segment(s) and a sampling frame. Prefer behavior/recency-based cohorts (e.g., “signed up 3–6 months ago and active”) when you need accurate recall. - **Outputs:** Sampling plan (in brief) + segment cuts. - **Checks:** You can explain why each segment is included and what decision it informs. ### 3) Choose the measurement design (metrics, scales, prioritization) - **Inputs:** Survey goal + audience. - **Actions:** Pick the core metric(s) (often CSAT); add 1–2 diagnostic questions that force prioritization (e.g., “pick top 3 barriers”) and frequency/impact weighting. - **Outputs:** Measurement plan (metric + diagnostics) + draft question list. - **Checks:** Every question maps to a decision, hypothesis, or segment cut; no “nice-to-have” questions. ### 4) Draft the questionnaire (sections, wording, and logic) - **Inputs:** Measurement plan; templates. - **Actions:** Write questions using neutral wording, single concepts per question, and consistent scales. Add segmentation/profile questions only if you will use them in analysis. - **Outputs:** Questionnaire with question IDs, response types, options, and skip logic notes. - **Checks:** No double-barreled or leading questions; completion time target ≤ 3–6 minutes for most surveys. ### 5) Build the instrument table + QA it (mobile + bias) - **Inputs:** Questionnaire draft. - **Actions:** Convert to an instrument table for implementation (IDs, types, options, required, logic). Check mobile rendering (all scale points visible) and option order/randomization. - **Outputs:** Survey instrument table + QA checklist items. - **Checks:** Scale labels are unambiguous; required questions are minimal; “Other (free text)” exists when appropriate. ### 6) Plan the launch (pilot, comms, monitoring, follow-ups) - **Inputs:** Instrument + sampling plan. - **Actions:** Define pilot (small n), launch dates, reminders, incentives, and a monitoring plan. If the goal is message validation, consider a behavioral “survey” via ad/landing tests instead of asking opinions. - **Outputs:** Launch plan + monitoring metrics (response rate, drop-off, segment mix). - **Checks:** You have a plan for low response rate and for closing the loop with respondents. ### 7) Analysis + report plan + quality gate - **Inputs:** Final instrument + goals. - **Actions:** Define how you’ll analyze (segments, cuts, coding of open-ended), the decision thresholds, and how results will be communicated. Run [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and score [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). Add Risks/Open questions/Next steps. - **Outputs:** Final Survey Pack. - **Checks:** A stakeholder can review async and decide “ship / adjust / investigate” without another meeting. ## Quality gate (required) - Use [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). - Always include: **Risks**, **Open questions**, **Next steps**. ## Examples **Example 1 (Onboarding):** “Design an onboarding survey to identify the buyer vs user and route leads appropriately.” Expected: short profiling questions (3–4 screens), clear segmentation fields, and a follow-up plan to avoid irrelevant outreach. **Example 2 (Product friction):** “Design a CSAT survey to find the top 3 productivity blockers for active users and how often they occur.” Expected: CSAT + forced-ranking diagnostics + frequency weighting, plus an analysis plan that yields a ranked backlog of issues. **Boundary example:** “We want to know if feature X caused retention to improve—send a survey.” Response: push back; recommend experiment/instrumentation for causality, and use a survey only for qualitative context (or run interviews).
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.