domain-research
MCP-powered domain research for requirements elicitation. Uses perplexity, context7, firecrawl, and other MCP servers to research domain knowledge, best practices, and industry requirements.
What this skill does
# Domain Research Skill
MCP-powered domain research for enriching requirements elicitation with external knowledge.
## MANDATORY: Documentation-First Approach
Before conducting domain research:
1. **Invoke `docs-management` skill** for requirements elicitation patterns
2. **Use MCP servers as primary research tools** (perplexity, context7, firecrawl)
3. **Base all guidance on official documentation and authoritative sources**
## When to Use This Skill
**Keywords:** domain research, MCP research, industry standards, best practices, competitive analysis, technology research, regulatory requirements
Invoke this skill when:
- Unfamiliar with a domain and need background
- Researching industry standards and best practices
- Investigating regulatory requirements
- Analyzing competitor features
- Exploring technology constraints
- Supplementing stakeholder knowledge
## Available MCP Servers
### Perplexity (General Research)
**Use for:**
- Industry best practices
- Recent developments
- Comparative analysis
- Regulatory overviews
```yaml
mcp_tool: mcp__perplexity__search
example_queries:
- "e-commerce checkout best practices 2025"
- "GDPR compliance requirements for SaaS"
- "authentication patterns for financial applications"
```
### Context7 (Library Documentation)
**Use for:**
- Framework requirements
- API constraints
- Library capabilities
- Technical limitations
```yaml
mcp_tools:
- mcp__context7__resolve-library-id
- mcp__context7__query-docs
example_queries:
- Library: "react" → Query: "state management patterns"
- Library: "fastapi" → Query: "authentication requirements"
```
### Firecrawl (Web Scraping)
**Use for:**
- Competitor analysis
- Documentation extraction
- Feature comparison
- Market research
```yaml
mcp_tools:
- mcp__firecrawl__firecrawl_search
- mcp__firecrawl__firecrawl_scrape
example_queries:
- Search: "inventory management software features"
- Scrape: Competitor feature pages
```
## Research Patterns
### Pattern 1: Domain Background
Build foundational domain knowledge:
```yaml
research_pattern: domain_background
steps:
1. Use perplexity for industry overview
2. Identify key concepts and terminology
3. Research common requirements in domain
4. Note regulatory considerations
output: Domain context document
```
### Pattern 2: Best Practices
Research current best practices:
```yaml
research_pattern: best_practices
steps:
1. Search for "best practices" in domain
2. Filter for recent (last 2 years)
3. Identify common patterns
4. Note recommended approaches
output: Best practices summary
```
### Pattern 3: Competitive Analysis
Research competitor features:
```yaml
research_pattern: competitive_analysis
steps:
1. Identify key competitors
2. Scrape feature pages with firecrawl
3. Extract capability lists
4. Compare and contrast
output: Competitive feature matrix
```
### Pattern 4: Regulatory Research
Research compliance requirements:
```yaml
research_pattern: regulatory
steps:
1. Identify applicable regulations
2. Research specific requirements
3. Note mandatory vs recommended
4. Document compliance criteria
output: Regulatory requirements list
```
### Pattern 5: Technology Constraints
Research technical requirements:
```yaml
research_pattern: technology
steps:
1. Identify technologies in scope
2. Use context7 for library docs
3. Research integration requirements
4. Document technical constraints
output: Technical requirements document
```
## Research Workflow
### Step 1: Define Research Scope
```yaml
research_scope:
domain: "{domain name}"
topic: "{specific focus area}"
depth: shallow|moderate|deep
sources: [perplexity, context7, firecrawl]
```
### Step 2: Execute Research Queries
For each research need:
1. Select appropriate MCP server
2. Formulate effective query
3. Process results
4. Extract requirements
### Step 3: Synthesize Findings
Combine research into actionable requirements:
- Identify common patterns
- Note conflicts or options
- Highlight mandatory items
- Suggest priorities
### Step 4: Document Results
Save research findings and derived requirements.
## Output Format
### Research Results
```yaml
research_session:
id: "RES-{timestamp}"
domain: "{domain}"
topic: "{research topic}"
timestamp: "{ISO-8601}"
queries_executed:
- server: perplexity
query: "{query text}"
results_count: {number}
- server: firecrawl
url: "{scraped URL}"
content_type: feature_page
findings:
domain_context:
- "{key finding 1}"
- "{key finding 2}"
best_practices:
- "{recommended practice 1}"
- "{recommended practice 2}"
regulatory:
- regulation: "GDPR"
requirements:
- "{requirement 1}"
- "{requirement 2}"
competitive:
- competitor: "{name}"
features:
- "{feature 1}"
- "{feature 2}"
derived_requirements:
- id: REQ-RES-001
text: "{requirement statement}"
source: research
source_detail: "{where this came from}"
confidence: low # Research-derived = low confidence
needs_validation: true
category: "{category}"
recommendations:
- topic: "{topic}"
finding: "{what research showed}"
implication: "{what this means for requirements}"
gaps_in_research:
- "{area where more research needed}"
```
## Query Optimization
### Effective Perplexity Queries
```yaml
query_patterns:
best_practices:
template: "{domain} {topic} best practices {year}"
example: "e-commerce checkout best practices 2025"
requirements:
template: "{domain} {topic} requirements specifications"
example: "healthcare application HIPAA requirements"
comparison:
template: "{topic A} vs {topic B} for {use case}"
example: "OAuth 2.0 vs SAML for enterprise SSO"
regulatory:
template: "{regulation} requirements for {industry}"
example: "PCI-DSS requirements for payment processing"
```
### Effective Context7 Queries
```yaml
query_patterns:
library_features:
resolve: "{library name}"
get_docs: topic="{specific feature}"
integration:
resolve: "{library name}"
get_docs: topic="integration authentication"
```
### Effective Firecrawl Queries
```yaml
query_patterns:
competitor_features:
search: "{competitor} features {product type}"
scrape: Feature page URLs
documentation:
search: "{technology} documentation requirements"
scrape: Official docs
```
## Confidence Levels
Research-derived requirements have inherent confidence limits:
```yaml
confidence_levels:
high:
sources: [official documentation, regulatory text]
note: "Verified from authoritative source"
medium:
sources: [industry articles, best practice guides]
note: "Generally accepted but verify with stakeholders"
low:
sources: [competitor analysis, general web]
note: "Use as starting point, requires validation"
```
## Delegation
For follow-up actions:
- **interview-conducting**: Validate research with stakeholders
- **gap-analysis**: Check research fills identified gaps
- **elicitation-methodology**: Return for technique selection
## Output Location
Save research results to:
```text
.requirements/{domain}/research/RES-{timestamp}.yaml
```
## Related
- `elicitation-methodology` - Parent hub skill
- `gap-analysis` - Research to fill gaps
- `interview-conducting` - Validate research findings
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-29
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.