edge-signal-aggregator
Aggregate and rank signals from multiple edge-finding skills (edge-candidate-agent, theme-detector, sector-analyst, institutional-flow-tracker) into a prioritized conviction dashboard with weighted scoring, deduplication, and contradiction detection.
What this skill does
# Edge Signal Aggregator
## Overview
Combine outputs from multiple upstream edge-finding skills into a single weighted conviction dashboard. This skill applies configurable signal weights, deduplicates overlapping themes, flags contradictions between skills, and ranks composite edge ideas by aggregate confidence score. The result is a prioritized edge shortlist with provenance links to each contributing skill.
## When to Use
- After running multiple edge-finding skills and wanting a unified view
- When consolidating signals from edge-candidate-agent, theme-detector, sector-analyst, and institutional-flow-tracker
- Before making portfolio allocation decisions based on multiple signal sources
- To identify contradictions between different analysis approaches
- When prioritizing which edge ideas deserve deeper research
## Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+
- No API keys required (processes local JSON/YAML files from other skills)
- Dependencies: `pyyaml` (standard in most environments)
## Workflow
### Step 1: Gather Upstream Skill Outputs
Collect output files from the upstream skills you want to aggregate:
- `reports/edge_candidate_*.json` from edge-candidate-agent
- `reports/edge_concepts_*.yaml` from edge-concept-synthesizer
- `reports/theme_detector_*.json` from theme-detector
- `reports/sector_analyst_*.json` from sector-analyst
- `reports/institutional_flow_*.json` from institutional-flow-tracker
- `reports/edge_hints_*.yaml` from edge-hint-extractor
### Step 2: Run Signal Aggregation
Execute the aggregator script with paths to upstream outputs:
```bash
python3 skills/edge-signal-aggregator/scripts/aggregate_signals.py \
--edge-candidates reports/edge_candidate_agent_*.json \
--edge-concepts reports/edge_concepts_*.yaml \
--themes reports/theme_detector_*.json \
--sectors reports/sector_analyst_*.json \
--institutional reports/institutional_flow_*.json \
--hints reports/edge_hints_*.yaml \
--output-dir reports/
```
Optional: Use a custom weights configuration:
```bash
python3 skills/edge-signal-aggregator/scripts/aggregate_signals.py \
--edge-candidates reports/edge_candidate_agent_*.json \
--weights-config skills/edge-signal-aggregator/assets/custom_weights.yaml \
--output-dir reports/
```
### Step 3: Review Aggregated Dashboard
Open the generated report to review:
1. **Ranked Edge Ideas** - Sorted by composite conviction score
2. **Signal Provenance** - Which skills contributed to each idea
3. **Contradictions** - Conflicting signals flagged for manual review
4. **Deduplication Log** - Merged overlapping themes
### Step 4: Act on High-Conviction Signals
Filter the shortlist by minimum conviction threshold:
```bash
python3 skills/edge-signal-aggregator/scripts/aggregate_signals.py \
--edge-candidates reports/edge_candidate_agent_*.json \
--min-conviction 0.7 \
--output-dir reports/
```
## Output Format
### JSON Report
```json
{
"schema_version": "1.0",
"generated_at": "2026-03-02T07:00:00Z",
"config": {
"weights": {
"edge_candidate_agent": 0.25,
"edge_concept_synthesizer": 0.20,
"theme_detector": 0.15,
"sector_analyst": 0.15,
"institutional_flow_tracker": 0.15,
"edge_hint_extractor": 0.10
},
"min_conviction": 0.5,
"dedup_similarity_threshold": 0.8
},
"summary": {
"total_input_signals": 42,
"unique_signals_after_dedup": 28,
"contradictions_found": 3,
"signals_above_threshold": 12
},
"ranked_signals": [
{
"rank": 1,
"signal_id": "sig_001",
"title": "AI Infrastructure Capex Acceleration",
"composite_score": 0.87,
"contributing_skills": [
{
"skill": "edge_candidate_agent",
"signal_ref": "ticket_2026-03-01_001",
"raw_score": 0.92,
"weighted_contribution": 0.23
},
{
"skill": "theme_detector",
"signal_ref": "theme_ai_infra",
"raw_score": 0.85,
"weighted_contribution": 0.13
}
],
"tickers": ["NVDA", "AMD", "AVGO"],
"direction": "LONG",
"time_horizon": "3-6 months",
"confidence_breakdown": {
"multi_skill_agreement": 0.30,
"signal_strength": 0.35,
"recency": 0.22
}
}
],
"contradictions": [
{
"contradiction_id": "contra_001",
"description": "Conflicting sector view on Energy",
"skill_a": {
"skill": "sector_analyst",
"signal": "Energy sector bearish rotation",
"direction": "SHORT"
},
"skill_b": {
"skill": "institutional_flow_tracker",
"signal": "Heavy institutional buying in XLE",
"direction": "LONG"
},
"resolution_hint": "Check timeframe mismatch (short-term vs long-term)"
}
],
"deduplication_log": [
{
"merged_into": "sig_001",
"duplicates_removed": ["theme_detector:ai_compute", "edge_hints:datacenter_demand"],
"similarity_score": 0.92
}
]
}
```
### Markdown Report
The markdown report provides a human-readable dashboard:
```markdown
# Edge Signal Aggregator Dashboard
**Generated:** 2026-03-02 07:00 UTC
## Summary
- Total Input Signals: 42
- Unique After Dedup: 28
- Contradictions: 3
- High Conviction (>0.7): 12
## Top 10 Edge Ideas by Conviction
### 1. AI Infrastructure Capex Acceleration (Score: 0.87)
- **Tickers:** NVDA, AMD, AVGO
- **Direction:** LONG | **Horizon:** 3-6 months
- **Contributing Skills:**
- edge-candidate-agent: 0.92 (ticket_2026-03-01_001)
- theme-detector: 0.85 (theme_ai_infra)
- **Confidence Breakdown:** Agreement 0.30 | Strength 0.35 | Recency 0.22
...
## Contradictions Requiring Review
### Energy Sector Conflict
- **sector-analyst:** Bearish rotation (SHORT)
- **institutional-flow-tracker:** Heavy buying XLE (LONG)
- **Hint:** Check timeframe mismatch
## Deduplication Summary
- 14 signals merged into 8 unique themes
- Average similarity of merged signals: 0.89
```
Reports are saved to `reports/` with filenames:
- `edge_signal_aggregator_YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS.json`
- `edge_signal_aggregator_YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS.md`
## Resources
- `scripts/aggregate_signals.py` -- Main aggregation script with CLI interface
- `references/signal-weighting-framework.md` -- Rationale for default weights and scoring methodology
- `assets/default_weights.yaml` -- Default skill weights configuration
## Key Principles
1. **Provenance Tracking** -- Every aggregated signal links back to its source skill and original reference
2. **Contradiction Transparency** -- Conflicting signals are flagged, not hidden, to enable informed decisions
3. **Configurable Weights** -- Default weights reflect typical reliability but can be customized per user
4. **Deduplication Without Loss** -- Merged signals retain references to all original sources
5. **Actionable Output** -- Ranked list with clear tickers, direction, and time horizon for each idea
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.