engineering-fundamentals
Auto-invoke for general code quality review. Enforces naming conventions, function size, DRY principles, SOLID principles, and code organization.
What this skill does
# Engineering Fundamentals Review
> "Code is read more than it is written. Write for the reader, not the machine."
## When to Apply
Activate this skill when reviewing:
- Any code changes
- Function and variable naming
- Code organization and structure
- General refactoring decisions
---
## Review Checklist
### Naming
- [ ] **Descriptive**: Can you understand the variable without context?
- [ ] **No abbreviations**: Are names spelled out? (`user` not `usr`)
- [ ] **No generic names**: No `data`, `temp`, `info`, `stuff`?
- [ ] **Boolean prefix**: Do booleans start with `is`, `has`, `can`, `should`?
- [ ] **Function verbs**: Do functions start with action verbs?
### Function Design
- [ ] **Single responsibility**: Does each function do ONE thing?
- [ ] **Size limit**: Are functions under 20-30 lines?
- [ ] **Parameter count**: Are there fewer than 4 parameters?
- [ ] **No side effects**: Are pure functions actually pure?
- [ ] **Early returns**: Are guard clauses used instead of deep nesting?
### Code Organization
- [ ] **DRY**: Is duplicated code extracted into functions?
- [ ] **But not too DRY**: Are abstractions justified (rule of three)?
- [ ] **Cohesion**: Are related things grouped together?
- [ ] **Separation**: Are unrelated things separated?
### Comments & Documentation
- [ ] **Why, not what**: Do comments explain reasoning, not obvious code?
- [ ] **No commented-out code**: Is dead code deleted, not commented?
- [ ] **JSDoc on public APIs**: Are exported functions documented?
---
## Common Mistakes (Anti-Patterns)
### 1. Magic Numbers
```
❌ if (status === 2) { ... }
setTimeout(callback, 86400000);
✅ const STATUS = { ACTIVE: 2, INACTIVE: 1 };
if (status === STATUS.ACTIVE) { ... }
const ONE_DAY_MS = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000;
setTimeout(callback, ONE_DAY_MS);
```
### 2. Unclear Naming
```
❌ const d = new Date();
const temp = getUser();
const flag = true;
✅ const createdAt = new Date();
const currentUser = getUser();
const isAuthenticated = true;
```
### 3. God Functions
```
❌ function processOrder(order) {
// 200 lines: validate, calculate, save, email, log...
}
✅ function processOrder(order) {
validateOrder(order);
const total = calculateTotal(order);
await saveOrder(order, total);
await sendConfirmationEmail(order);
logOrderProcessed(order);
}
```
### 4. Deep Nesting
```
❌ function check(user) {
if (user) {
if (user.active) {
if (user.role === 'admin') {
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}
✅ function check(user) {
if (!user) return false;
if (!user.active) return false;
if (user.role !== 'admin') return false;
return true;
}
```
### 5. Premature Abstraction
```
❌ // Used once, but has 10 configuration options
createFlexibleReusableButton({ ... });
✅ // Just make the button
<button className="primary">Submit</button>
// Abstract when you need it 3+ times
```
---
## SOLID Principles Quick Check
| Principle | Question | Red Flag |
|-----------|----------|----------|
| **S**ingle Responsibility | "Does this class/function do one thing?" | Class with 10+ methods |
| **O**pen/Closed | "Can I extend without modifying?" | Switch statements for types |
| **L**iskov Substitution | "Can I swap implementations?" | Overriding methods that break contracts |
| **I**nterface Segregation | "Are interfaces focused?" | Clients forced to depend on unused methods |
| **D**ependency Inversion | "Do high-level modules depend on abstractions?" | Direct instantiation of dependencies |
---
## Socratic Questions
Ask the junior these questions instead of giving answers:
1. **Naming**: "Would a new developer understand this name without context?"
2. **Function Size**: "Can you describe what this function does in one sentence?"
3. **Duplication**: "I see this pattern in three places. What happens if it needs to change?"
4. **Abstraction**: "How many times is this abstraction actually used?"
5. **Readability**: "If you came back to this code in 6 months, would you understand it?"
---
## Naming Conventions
| Type | Convention | Example |
|------|------------|---------|
| Variables | camelCase | `userName`, `isActive` |
| Constants | UPPER_SNAKE_CASE | `MAX_RETRIES`, `API_URL` |
| Functions | camelCase + verb | `getUser()`, `handleSubmit()` |
| Classes | PascalCase | `UserService`, `AuthProvider` |
| Files (components) | PascalCase | `UserProfile.tsx` |
| Files (utilities) | camelCase | `formatDate.ts` |
---
## Standards Reference
See detailed patterns in:
- `/standards/global/naming-conventions.md`
---
## Red Flags to Call Out
| Flag | Question to Ask |
|------|-----------------|
| Single letter variables | "What does `d` represent?" |
| Functions > 30 lines | "Can we break this into smaller functions?" |
| > 3 levels of nesting | "Can we use early returns?" |
| Copy-pasted code | "If this logic changes, how many places need updating?" |
| Commented-out code | "Is this needed? Can we delete it?" |
| TODO without tracking | "Is there a ticket for this?" |
| Magic strings/numbers | "Should this be a named constant?" |
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.