ethics-review
AI and technology ethics review including ethical impact assessment, stakeholder analysis, and responsible innovation frameworks
What this skill does
# Ethics Review
Comprehensive guidance for ethical assessment of technology systems, AI applications, and responsible innovation.
## When to Use This Skill
- Conducting ethical impact assessments for new projects
- Evaluating AI systems for ethical risks
- Establishing ethics review boards and processes
- Developing ethical guidelines for technology teams
- Assessing stakeholder impacts and potential harms
## Core Ethical Principles
### Foundation Principles
| Principle | Description | Application |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|
| **Beneficence** | Do good, maximize benefits | Design for positive outcomes |
| **Non-maleficence** | Do no harm, minimize risks | Identify and mitigate harms |
| **Autonomy** | Respect individual choice | Informed consent, opt-out |
| **Justice** | Fair distribution of benefits/burdens | Equitable access, no discrimination |
| **Transparency** | Open about how systems work | Explainable AI, clear documentation |
| **Accountability** | Clear responsibility | Ownership, audit trails |
| **Privacy** | Protect personal information | Data minimization, consent |
### Technology-Specific Principles
```text
AI/ML Systems:
├── Fairness - Equitable treatment across groups
├── Explainability - Understandable decisions
├── Reliability - Consistent, predictable behavior
├── Safety - Prevent harm, fail safely
├── Privacy - Protect personal data
├── Security - Resist adversarial attacks
├── Inclusiveness - Accessible to all users
└── Human Control - Meaningful human oversight
```
## Ethical Impact Assessment Framework
### Assessment Process
```text
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Ethical Impact Assessment │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Describe │ System purpose, capabilities, context │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2. Stakeholder │ Identify all affected parties │
│ Analysis │ Map interests and concerns │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 3. Impact │ Assess benefits and harms │
│ Assessment │ Evaluate likelihood and severity │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 4. Ethical │ Apply ethical principles │
│ Analysis │ Identify conflicts and tensions │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 5. Mitigation │ Design controls and safeguards │
│ Planning │ Define monitoring approach │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 6. Decision & │ Approve, modify, or reject │
│ Review │ Schedule ongoing review │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
### Ethical Impact Assessment Template
```markdown
# Ethical Impact Assessment
## 1. System Description
### Purpose
[What is the system designed to do?]
### Capabilities
[What can the system do? What decisions does it make or influence?]
### Context
[Where and how will the system be used?]
### Data
[What data does the system use? How is it collected?]
---
## 2. Stakeholder Analysis
### Direct Stakeholders
| Stakeholder | Relationship | Interests | Power | Concerns |
|-------------|--------------|-----------|-------|----------|
| [Group] | [Relationship] | [Interests] | [H/M/L] | [Concerns] |
### Indirect Stakeholders
| Stakeholder | How Affected | Interests | Concerns |
|-------------|--------------|-----------|----------|
| [Group] | [Impact] | [Interests] | [Concerns] |
### Vulnerable Groups
| Group | Vulnerability | Special Considerations |
|-------|---------------|----------------------|
| [Group] | [Why vulnerable] | [Protections needed] |
---
## 3. Impact Assessment
### Benefits
| Benefit | Beneficiary | Magnitude | Likelihood |
|---------|-------------|-----------|------------|
| [Benefit] | [Who] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] |
### Potential Harms
| Harm | Affected Group | Severity | Likelihood | Reversible? |
|------|----------------|----------|------------|-------------|
| [Harm] | [Who] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Y/N] |
### Unintended Consequences
| Consequence | Description | Risk Level |
|-------------|-------------|------------|
| [Consequence] | [Details] | [H/M/L] |
---
## 4. Ethical Analysis
### Principle Evaluation
| Principle | Supports | Tensions | Score (1-5) |
|-----------|----------|----------|-------------|
| Beneficence | [How] | [Conflicts] | [Score] |
| Non-maleficence | [How] | [Conflicts] | [Score] |
| Autonomy | [How] | [Conflicts] | [Score] |
| Justice | [How] | [Conflicts] | [Score] |
| Transparency | [How] | [Conflicts] | [Score] |
| Accountability | [How] | [Conflicts] | [Score] |
| Privacy | [How] | [Conflicts] | [Score] |
### Ethical Dilemmas
| Dilemma | Trade-off | Proposed Resolution |
|---------|-----------|---------------------|
| [Dilemma] | [Trade-off] | [Resolution] |
---
## 5. Mitigation Plan
### Technical Mitigations
| Risk | Mitigation | Owner | Status |
|------|------------|-------|--------|
| [Risk] | [Control] | [Who] | [Status] |
### Procedural Mitigations
| Risk | Mitigation | Owner | Status |
|------|------------|-------|--------|
| [Risk] | [Process] | [Who] | [Status] |
### Monitoring Plan
| Metric | Threshold | Frequency | Response |
|--------|-----------|-----------|----------|
| [Metric] | [Limit] | [How often] | [Action] |
---
## 6. Decision
### Recommendation
[ ] Approve - Proceed with current design
[ ] Approve with conditions - Proceed after mitigations
[ ] Defer - Requires further analysis
[ ] Reject - Unacceptable ethical risks
### Conditions (if applicable)
1. [Condition]
2. [Condition]
### Review Schedule
- Initial review: [Date]
- Ongoing review: [Frequency]
### Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|------|------|----------|------|
| Ethics Board | | [ ] | |
| Technical Lead | | [ ] | |
| Business Owner | | [ ] | |
| Legal | | [ ] | |
```
## Harm Assessment Framework
### Categories of Harm
```text
Direct Harms:
├── Physical harm to individuals
├── Psychological harm (stress, manipulation)
├── Financial harm (fraud, loss)
├── Privacy harm (exposure, surveillance)
├── Discrimination harm (unfair treatment)
└── Autonomy harm (manipulation, coercion)
Indirect/Systemic Harms:
├── Environmental harm
├── Democratic harm (manipulation, division)
├── Economic harm (displacement, inequality)
├── Social harm (erosion of trust, relationships)
└── Cultural harm (homogenization, loss)
Group-Specific Harms:
├── Harm to marginalized groups
├── Harm to vulnerable populations
├── Harm to future generations
└── Harm to non-users
```
### Harm Severity Matrix
```text
REVERSIBILITY
Easy Difficult Permanent
S Low 1 2 3
E Medium 2 4 6
V High 3 6 9
E Extreme 4 8 12
R
I
T
Y
Score:
1-2: Acceptable with monitoring
3-4: Requires mitigation
6-8: Significant controls required
9-12: May be unacceptable
```
## AI Ethics Specifics
### AI Ethics Checklist
```csharp
public class AiEthicsChecklist
{
public List<EthicsCheckItem> GetChecklist()
{
return new List<EthicsCheckItem>
{
// Fairness
new("FAIR-01", "Bias Testing",
"Has the model been tested for bias across protected groups?",
EthicsCategory.Fairness, Priority.Critical),
new("FAIR-02", "Fairness Metrics",
"Are fairness metrics defined and monitored?",
EthicsCategory.Fairness, Priority.High),
new("FAIR-03", "Training Data",
"Is training data representative and free from historical bias?",
EthicsCategory.Fairness, Priority.Critical),
// Transparency
new("TRANS-0Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.