experiment-code
Write ML experiment code with iterative improvement. Generate training/evaluation pipelines, debug errors, and optimize results through code reflection. Use when implementing experiments for a research paper.
What this skill does
# Experiment Code Generate and iteratively improve ML experiment code for research papers. ## Input - `$0` — Task: `generate`, `improve`, `debug`, `plot` - `$1` — Research plan, idea description, or error message ## References - Experiment prompts and patterns: `~/.claude/skills/experiment-code/references/experiment-prompts.md` - Code patterns (error handling, repair, hill-climbing): `~/.claude/skills/experiment-code/references/code-patterns.md` ## Action: `generate` Generate initial experiment code following this structure: 1. **Plan experiments first** — List all runs needed (hyperparameter sweeps, ablations, baselines) 2. **Write self-contained code** — All code in project directory, no external imports from reference repos 3. **Include proper logging** — Save results to JSON, print intermediate metrics 4. **Generate figures** — At minimum Figure_1.png and Figure_2.png ### Mandatory Structure ``` project/ ├── experiment.py # Main experiment script ├── plot.py # Visualization script ├── notes.txt # Experiment descriptions and results ├── run_1/ # Results from run 1 │ └── final_info.json ├── run_2/ └── ... ``` ### Constraints - No placeholder code (`pass`, `...`, `raise NotImplementedError`) - Must use actual datasets (not toy data unless explicitly requested) - PyTorch or scikit-learn preferred (no TensorFlow/Keras) - Each run uses: `python experiment.py --out_dir=run_i` ## Action: `improve` Improve existing experiment code: 1. Read current code and results 2. Reflect on what worked and what didn't 3. Apply targeted edits (prefer small edits over full rewrites) 4. Re-run and compare scores 5. Keep the best-performing code variant ## Action: `debug` Fix experiment code errors: 1. Read the error message (truncate to last 1500 chars if very long) 2. Identify the root cause 3. Apply minimal fix 4. Up to 4 retry attempts before changing approach ## Action: `plot` Generate publication-quality plots from experiment results: 1. Read all `run_*/final_info.json` files 2. Generate comparison plots with proper labels 3. Use the figure-generation skill for styling ## Rules - Always plan experiments before writing code - After each run, document results in notes.txt - Include print statements explaining what results show - Method MUST not get 0% accuracy — verify accuracy calculations - Use seeds for reproducibility - Before each experiment include a print statement explaining exactly what the results are meant to show ## Related Skills - Upstream: [experiment-design](../experiment-design/), [algorithm-design](../algorithm-design/) - Downstream: [data-analysis](../data-analysis/), [backward-traceability](../backward-traceability/) - See also: [code-debugging](../code-debugging/), [paper-to-code](../paper-to-code/)
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.