feedback
Use this skill when the user needs to collect user feedback, run surveys, set up NPS, prioritize feature requests, close the feedback loop, or turn customer input into product decisions. Covers feedback collection methods, survey design, prioritization frameworks, and building a feedback-driven product culture.
What this skill does
# User Feedback & Feature Requests Feedback is abundant but insight is rare. Your job is not to build everything users ask for — it's to understand the problems behind the requests. This skill helps you collect, prioritize, and act on feedback without drowning in it. ## Core Principles - Feedback is a gift, but not all gifts are useful. Filter signal from noise. - Users describe solutions. Your job is to find the problem underneath. - "Build what customers ask for" is wrong. "Solve the problems customers reveal" is right. - A feedback system you actually use beats a perfect one you ignore. Start simple. - Closing the loop (telling users what you did with their feedback) is the most powerful retention tool you have. ## Feedback Collection Methods ### Ranked by Signal Quality | Method | Signal Quality | Effort | Best For | |--------|---------------|--------|----------| | 1-on-1 conversations | Highest | High | Early stage, understanding "why" | | Support ticket analysis | High | Low | Finding recurring pain points | | In-app feedback widget | High | Low | Contextual, in-the-moment feedback | | NPS survey | Medium | Low | Tracking sentiment over time | | Cancellation survey | High | Low | Understanding churn drivers | | Feature request board | Medium | Low | Aggregating demand signals | | Social media mentions | Medium | Low | Unfiltered opinions | | Usage analytics | High | Medium | What users DO vs. what they SAY | ### What to Use When ``` 0-50 users: Talk to every user. Email them. Get on calls. No tools needed. 50-200 users: In-app feedback widget + cancellation survey + monthly NPS 200-500 users: Add a public feature request board + quarterly user interviews 500+ users: All of the above + systematic ticket analysis ``` --- ## In-App Feedback ### Simple Feedback Widget **Tell AI:** ``` Add a feedback widget to my app. Requirements: - Small "Feedback" button fixed to the bottom-right corner - Clicking opens a simple form: text area + optional email - Includes the current page URL and user ID automatically - Saves to a [feedback] table in the database - Shows a "Thank you" message after submission - No third-party tool needed — just store it in the database ``` ### Contextual Feedback Triggers Collect feedback at the right moment: | Trigger | Question | |---------|----------| | After completing a key action | "How was that experience? (1-5)" | | After 7 days of usage | "What's the one thing you'd improve?" | | After upgrading | "What made you decide to upgrade?" | | After using a new feature | "Was this feature helpful? Yes / No / Needs improvement" | | After a support interaction | "Did we resolve your issue? (1-5)" | --- ## NPS (Net Promoter Score) ### How It Works Ask one question: **"How likely are you to recommend [Product] to a friend? (0-10)"** - **0-6:** Detractors (unhappy, at risk of churning) - **7-8:** Passives (satisfied but not enthusiastic) - **9-10:** Promoters (loyal, will refer others) **NPS = % Promoters - % Detractors** ### NPS Benchmarks for SaaS | Score | Assessment | |-------|-----------| | < 0 | More detractors than promoters. Fix the product | | 0-30 | Average. Room to improve | | 30-50 | Good. Users like your product | | 50+ | Excellent. Strong word-of-mouth potential | ### Running an NPS Survey **Tell AI:** ``` Add a quarterly NPS survey to my app. - Show to users who have been active for 30+ days - Question: "How likely are you to recommend [Product]? (0-10)" - Follow-up: "What's the main reason for your score?" (open text) - Don't show to users who responded in the last 90 days - Store responses with user ID and timestamp - Dashboard showing NPS trend over time ``` **Follow up based on score:** | Score | Action | |-------|--------| | 0-6 (Detractor) | Personal email: "I saw your feedback. Can I help?" | | 7-8 (Passive) | Ask: "What would make us a 9 or 10?" | | 9-10 (Promoter) | Ask for a review, testimonial, or referral | --- ## Feature Request Management ### The Feature Request Board A public or internal board where requests are collected and prioritized. **Simple options:** - Canny (free tier available) - Fider (open source, self-hosted) - Notion board (free, manual) - GitHub Discussions (free, developer-friendly) **Tell AI:** ``` Help me set up a feature request system using [Notion / database table]. I need: - Users can submit requests (title + description) - Users can upvote existing requests - I can tag requests by category and status - Status options: Under Review, Planned, In Progress, Shipped, Won't Do - A public-facing view and a private admin view ``` ### Processing Feature Requests Not every request deserves action. Use this filter: ``` For each feature request, ask: 1. How many users requested this? (1 user = anecdote, 10+ = pattern) 2. What's the problem behind the request? (they want X, but WHY?) 3. Does it align with our product direction? 4. How much effort to build? (hours, not weeks) 5. Will it reduce churn, increase conversion, or expand revenue? Score: Impact (1-5) × Confidence (1-5) / Effort (1-5) = Priority Score ``` ### What Users Say vs. What They Mean | What They Say | What They Might Mean | |---------------|---------------------| | "Can you add a calendar view?" | "I need to see my tasks by date" (many solutions) | | "I want an API" | "I want to connect this to my other tools" (Zapier might work) | | "Make it faster" | "The dashboard takes too long to load" (specific page, specific fix) | | "Add more customization" | "The defaults don't fit my workflow" (better defaults might fix it) | | "Build a mobile app" | "I need to check one thing on my phone" (responsive web might work) | --- ## Closing the Feedback Loop The most underused retention tool. When you ship something a user asked for, tell them: ### Shipped Notification ``` Subject: You asked, we built it — [Feature Name] is live Hi [Name], A few weeks ago you told us you wanted [what they asked for]. I'm happy to let you know it's live now. Here's how to use it: [link or quick instructions] Thanks for shaping the product — your feedback directly drives what we build next. [Your name] ``` ### Monthly Changelog ``` Subject: What's new in [Product] — [Month] Here's what we shipped this month: Built because you asked: - [Feature] — requested by [X] users - [Improvement] — based on your feedback Bug fixes: - [Fix 1] - [Fix 2] Coming next: - [Planned feature 1] - [Planned feature 2] Have feedback? Reply to this email or use the feedback button in the app. ``` --- ## Feedback Metrics Track monthly: ``` | Metric | This Month | Last Month | |---------------------------------|------------|------------| | Total feedback items received | | | | NPS score | | | | Top 3 requested features | | | | Features shipped from feedback | | | | Avg time from request to ship | | | | Feedback response rate | | | ``` --- ## Common Mistakes | Mistake | Fix | |---------|-----| | Building every feature users ask for | Prioritize by impact, confidence, and effort | | Collecting feedback but never acting on it | Review feedback weekly. Ship something from it monthly | | Never telling users you shipped their request | Close the loop. Always notify them | | Only listening to the loudest users | Quiet users churn silently. Reach out proactively | | Treating feature requests as specs | Users describe solutions. Your job is to find the problem | | No system — feedback in email, Slack, DMs | Centralize all feedback in one place | | Asking for feedback too often | NPS quarterly. In-app widget always available. Don't pester | --- ## Success Looks Like - Every piece of feedback goes into one centralized system - You review feedback weekly and act on it monthly - Users know their feedback is heard (closed loop) -
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.