fix-coderabbit-review
End-to-end remediation workflow for PR review feedback by PR number. Use when Codex must export CodeRabbit issues for a PR, fix every issue completely, commit all fixes in a single commit, and resolve GitHub review threads afterward. Don't use for general PR reviews unrelated to CodeRabbit, draft PRs without review threads, or merge-strategy decisions.
What this skill does
# Fix CodeRabbit Review Execute PR review remediation in a strict sequence: export issues, fix all issues, commit once, resolve threads. Core principle: evaluate each review item technically before changing code. Do not apply suggestions blindly. ## Required Inputs - PR number (integer). - `GITHUB_TOKEN` in environment. - `gh` authenticated for the target repository. ## Workflow 1. Export review issues for the PR. 2. Triage and validate every unresolved issue. 3. Fix every validated issue completely. 4. Commit all remediation changes together in one commit. 5. Resolve review threads and mark exported issues resolved. Run commands from repository root. ## Step 1: Export CodeRabbit Issues Use bundled exporter script: ```bash PR_NUMBER=<pr-number> uv run .claude/skills/fix-coderabbit-review/scripts/pr_review.py "$PR_NUMBER" --hide-resolved ``` Read generated files in: - `ai-docs/reviews-pr-<PR_NUMBER>/_summary.md` - `ai-docs/reviews-pr-<PR_NUMBER>/issues/*.md` If `_summary.md` shows unresolved issues, continue until all are addressed in code. ## Step 2: Triage and Validate Issues Review each unresolved issue file before implementation. For each issue: 1. Restate the concrete technical change required. 2. Verify against current codebase behavior and tests. 3. Decide one of: - `VALID`: suggestion is correct and should be implemented. - `INVALID`: suggestion is incorrect or not actionable for this codebase. Rules: - If an issue is ambiguous, treat it as `INVALID`, document rationale and assumptions in the issue file, and continue execution. - If an issue is `INVALID`, document technical rationale directly in the issue file and do not force a bad change. - Prefer technical evidence over agreement language. ## Step 3: Fix Issues Completely Process all unresolved issue files under `ai-docs/reviews-pr-<PR_NUMBER>/issues/`. - Implement production-quality fixes in source code. - Add or update tests so each fix is verified. - Execute fixes one issue at a time and validate each before moving to the next. - Do not leave partial fixes. - Do not skip issues unless they are invalid; for invalid issues, keep rationale in the issue file. After finishing all issue fixes, run full verification before commit: ```bash pnpm run lint pnpm run typecheck pnpm run test ``` ## Step 4: Commit All Fixes Together Create exactly one remediation commit containing all related code, test, and issue-tracking changes. ```bash git add -A git commit -m "fix(repo): resolve PR #<PR_NUMBER> review issues" ``` Do not split fixes across multiple commits. ## Step 5: Resolve Review Threads After the single commit is created, resolve exported issue threads. Determine the issue range from issue files (example: `001` to `018`) and run: ```bash uv run .claude/skills/fix-coderabbit-review/scripts/resolve_pr_issues.py \ --pr-dir ai-docs/reviews-pr-<PR_NUMBER> \ --from <first-issue-number> \ --to <last-issue-number> ``` Re-open `ai-docs/reviews-pr-<PR_NUMBER>/_summary.md` and confirm unresolved count is `0`. If thread resolution fails for specific IDs, keep those issues marked unresolved and report exact failures instead of claiming completion. ## Output Contract Deliver: - One commit containing all remediation changes. - Per-issue technical disposition (`VALID` or `INVALID`) recorded during triage. - Updated `ai-docs/reviews-pr-<PR_NUMBER>/issues/*.md` statuses. - Updated `ai-docs/reviews-pr-<PR_NUMBER>/_summary.md` counts/checklist. - Resolved review threads for addressed issues.
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.