foundation-meeting-recap
Produces a topic-segmented post-meeting summary for attendees with decisions highlighted and actions captured inline per topic (plus a consolidated action view at the end). Auto-populates topic skeleton from a sibling meeting-agenda when available and reconciles planned vs. actual topics. Accepts transcripts from Zoom, Meet, Otter, Fireflies, Krisp MCP, or manual notes; runs on variable-quality input without blocking.
What this skill does
<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->
# Meeting Recap
A meeting recap is a post-meeting topic-segmented summary produced for attendees and light distribution. It organizes content by topic rather than chronology, highlights decisions visually, and captures actions inline (with owner, due date, dependencies) per topic segment, plus a consolidated actions view at the end for scannability.
This skill absorbs what would otherwise be a separate "meeting-actions" skill. Actions in this family live alongside the context that makes them meaningful, not in a sibling artifact.
This skill belongs to the Meeting Skills Family. It conforms to the [Meeting Skills Family Contract](../../docs/reference/skill-families/meeting-skills-contract.md).
## When to Use
- After any internal meeting that produces decisions or actions affecting attendees
- When a sibling `foundation-meeting-agenda` exists and needs reconciliation (planned vs. actual topics)
- When the team needs a topic-organized reference rather than a chronological transcript dump
- When inputs include a transcript (Zoom, Meet, Otter, Fireflies, Krisp MCP) or mixed notes and transcript
## When NOT to Use
- Communicating outcomes to non-attendees. Use `foundation-stakeholder-update`. recap assumes reader context; stakeholder-update translates to readers without it.
- Cross-meeting synthesis (patterns across multiple meetings). Use `foundation-meeting-synthesize`.
- Live meeting note-taking. This skill consumes finished inputs; it does not transcribe live.
## Zero-friction execution
Per the family contract, this skill never blocks on interrogation. Default flow:
1. Read all provided inputs (transcript, notes, or hybrid) and note input quality upfront
2. Auto-discover related agenda via filename-prefix match on same-directory `*_{title}_agenda.md`
3. Run inference: meeting metadata from content, decisions from language markers, actions from imperative-future patterns, owners from attendee context
4. Present a brief inference summary and accept one-word `go` or corrections
5. Produce the recap
If invoked with `--go`, skip the inference summary. If the user provides all metadata upfront, no checkpoint appears.
## Fabrication prohibition
This skill never fabricates owners, decisions, or actions. When an action lacks an explicit owner, it is captured as `[owner: unassigned, needs confirmation]` not invented. When a decision is implicit ("it sounded like we decided X"), it is flagged with a confidence marker rather than stated as fact. Trust decay from fabrication is worse than the mild friction of flagging.
## Ownership reconciliation threshold (v1.1.0)
When the ratio of unassigned actions to total actions exceeds **0.3** (30%), OR when any high-priority action lacks an owner, the skill surfaces a dedicated `## ⚠ Ownership reconciliation required` section at the top of the recap (above the topic segments) listing:
- All unassigned actions
- A suggested next step for each (who should probably own this based on topic context, flagged as inference)
- A recommended follow-up action (Slack thread, 15-min sync, async survey)
The shareable summary also leads with this flag when triggered: `⚠ Ownership reconciliation required: N of M actions lack owners.`
The `unassigned_action_ratio` frontmatter field (float 0.0-1.0) records the ratio for downstream tools.
Rationale: a recap with 60% ownerless actions is "non-fabricated" (per the prohibition above) but operationally broken. a pile of broken tickets. The threshold makes this visible instead of silently shipping.
## Instructions
When asked to create a meeting recap, follow these steps:
1. **Parse inputs and detect type**
Transcript (timestamped speaker-attributed lines), notes (bullet or prose), or hybrid. Note input quality upfront. transcript plus structured notes is high; scrappy bullets is low.
2. **Auto-discover related agenda**
Look in the same directory for a file matching the pattern `{YYYY-MM-DD}_{HH-MMtimezone}_{title-slug}_agenda.md`. If found, load it. its topic list is the recap's topic skeleton and its `desired_outcomes` drive the meeting-quality reconciliation.
3. **Present go-mode inference summary**
Show detected meeting date, title, attendees (if inferred), input quality assessment. Accept `go` or corrections.
4. **Topic-segment the content**
- If agenda was loaded, use its topic list as scaffold (plus any emergent topics)
- If no agenda, identify topics from transcript discourse markers ("moving on to", "the other thing")
5. **Per topic segment, extract**
- **Discussion summary**: 2-3 sentences capturing what was discussed
- **Decisions made**: bold-flagged visually. Never fabricate. if uncertain, flag "appears to have decided X [confidence: medium]"
- **Actions**: owner + due date + dependencies. Flag missing owners as `[owner: unassigned]` and missing dates as `[due: not specified]`. Never invent.
- **Open questions**: unresolved items with confidence marker on whether they are truly unresolved or simply not re-raised
6. **Consolidate actions by owner**
Regroup all actions under each owner. Enables single-owner scan ("what do I owe after this meeting?").
7. **Reconcile agenda** (if agenda loaded)
- `topics_planned`: from agenda topic list
- `topics_hit`: topics actually discussed
- `topics_skipped`: planned but not discussed, with brief reason
- `topics_emerged`: discussed but not on agenda
8. **Assess meeting quality signals**
- `outcomes_achieved`: N/M ratio of agenda `desired_outcomes` met (when agenda present)
- `started_on_time` / `ended_on_time`: from timestamps when available; skipped when not
- `key_attendees_present`: flag if decision-makers were absent
9. **Surface next steps**
When we reconvene, what needs to happen on the critical path before that.
10. **Render TEMPLATE.md and validate**
- Every action's owner appears in `attendees` or is explicitly `unassigned`
- `meeting_quality.outcomes_achieved` matches `N/M` pattern when populated
- `agenda_reconciliation` fields present even when empty lists
## Quality checklist
- [ ] Input quality flagged honestly (high / medium / low)
- [ ] Agenda auto-discovery attempted; result noted in Generation context
- [ ] Every topic segment has Discussion / Decisions / Actions / Open questions subsections
- [ ] Decisions are bold-flagged; never invented; confidence marked when inferred
- [ ] Every action has owner (or explicit `unassigned`) + due date (or explicit `not specified`)
- [ ] Consolidated actions view regrouped by owner
- [ ] Agenda reconciliation populated when agenda was loaded
- [ ] Meeting quality signals populated with data available; skipped fields flagged
- [ ] Shareable summary 5-6 lines, lead with decisions and top actions
- [ ] Sources and References Generation context notes transcript source and any missing owners/dates
## See also
- [Meeting Skills Family Contract](../../docs/reference/skill-families/meeting-skills-contract.md)
- [`foundation-meeting-agenda`](../foundation-meeting-agenda/SKILL.md). upstream: provides topic skeleton and desired-outcomes
- [`foundation-meeting-synthesize`](../foundation-meeting-synthesize/SKILL.md). downstream: consumes recaps for cross-meeting synthesis
- [`foundation-stakeholder-update`](../foundation-stakeholder-update/SKILL.md). downstream: translates recap outcomes to non-attendees
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.