fusion-issue-authoring
Classify issue type, activate the matching agent mode for type-specific drafting, and enforce shared safety gates before GitHub mutation.
What this skill does
# Issue Authoring
## Agent modes
This skill uses internal agent modes for type-specific drafting logic:
- `agents/bug.agent.md`: bug-focused issue drafting and triage structure
- `agents/feature.agent.md`: feature-focused scope and acceptance structure
- `agents/user-story.agent.md`: role/workflow/scenario-driven story structure
- `agents/task.agent.md`: checklist-first task decomposition and dependency planning
- `agents/devils-advocate.agent.md`: always-on quality collaborator that raises key concerns after classification (moderate mode) and runs a full structured interview when explicitly asked, when scope/criteria gaps are significant, or when invoked from `fusion-issue-task-planning` with two or more architecture-ambiguity signals present (interrogator mode)
Agent modes are activated internally based on issue type classification. Users never reference agent files directly. Shared gates (labels, assignee confirmation, draft review, publish confirmation, and mutation sequencing) remain in this skill.
## When to use
Use when turning ideas, bugs, feature requests, or user needs into clear, actionable GitHub issues, and as top-level router for creating and updating issues.
Typical triggers:
- "create an issue"
- "draft a ticket"
- "turn this into a GitHub issue"
- "help me structure this work item"
- "update / maintain / clean up this issue"
- "add this as a sub-issue / set parent issue / link as child"
## When not to use
- Implementing code changes
- PR authoring or review
- General research not resulting in an issue draft
- Mutating GitHub state without explicit user confirmation
## Required inputs
Collect before publishing:
- Target repository
- Issue intent/context and type (Bug, Feature, User Story, Task)
- Existing issue number/URL when updating
- Repository label set (or confirmation labels are intentionally skipped). Cache full label set per repo for session; filter locally. Prefer host session memory; otherwise `.tmp/` cache file (never committed).
- Parent/related issue links and dependency direction (sub-issue vs blocking)
- Assignee preference (`@me`, specific person, or unassigned). Reuse cached assignee-candidate results; skip searches when user gave `@me` or exact login.
If required details are missing, ask concise clarifying questions from `references/questions.md`.
If issue destination is unclear, ask explicitly where the issue should be created/updated before drafting mutation commands.
## Instructions
### Step 1 — Classify and route
Classify request as `Bug`, `Feature`, `User Story`, or `Task`, then activate the matching agent mode:
- Bug -> `agents/bug.agent.md`
- Feature -> `agents/feature.agent.md`
- User Story -> `agents/user-story.agent.md`
- Task -> `agents/task.agent.md`
If ambiguous, ask only essential clarifying questions.
Devil's advocate pass: `agents/devils-advocate.agent.md` is always active in moderate mode — it surfaces the 2–3 most important concerns after classification without interrupting flow. When the user asks to be "grilled", says "stress-test this", when scope/criteria gaps are significant, or when invoked from `fusion-issue-task-planning` with two or more architecture-ambiguity signals present, escalate to interrogator mode for a full structured interview before the type-specific agent. The devil's advocate returns confirmed decisions and noted risks, then hands off to the type-specific drafting agent.
### Step 2 — Resolve repository and template
- Resolve the destination repository before any mutation.
- When no explicit repository is given, check the active workspace for contributor guides (`CONTRIBUTING.md`, `contribute/`) that define default issue routing by type. Apply any routing rules found there before asking the user.
- If no routing guidance exists in the repo, ask explicitly where the issue should be created.
- Template precedence:
1. repository template (`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/`)
2. specialist fallback template
### Step 3 — Check duplicates
Run one focused duplicate search with `mcp_github::search_issues` and surface matches before drafting/publishing.
Do not run repeated broad duplicate scans unless the user changes scope/title materially.
### Step 4 — Draft first
Before writing, check user preferences and session memory for a preferred draft location. If a stored preference exists, use it. If no preference is found and the intent is ambiguous, ask once and remember the answer for the session. Default to `.tmp/{TYPE}-{CONTEXT}.md` when no preference is found and there is nothing to ask about. Write the draft using GitHub Flavored Markdown.
### Step 5 — Review and confirm
- Ask for content edits first.
- Ask explicit publish confirmation before mutation.
- Never publish/update in the same pass as first draft unless user explicitly confirms.
### Step 6 — Apply shared gates
Before mutation, confirm:
- labels (only labels that exist in the target repo)
- assignee intent (`@me`, specific login, or unassigned)
Shared gate cache policy:
- On the first label lookup for `owner/repo`, fetch the repository label set once and cache it for the active session. Prefer `/memories/session/<owner>-<repo>-labels.json` when the host exposes session memory; otherwise use `.tmp/issue-authoring-labels-<owner>-<repo>.json`.
- On cache hit, validate requested labels locally. Do not repeat point lookups for each requested label.
- If the host only exposes point label lookups and no cached label set exists yet, do not loop through labels one by one. Ask whether to skip optional labels or include only user-confirmed labels in the first `mcp_github::issue_write` call and handle a single rejection path.
- Skip `mcp_github::search_users` when the user already gave `@me` or an exact GitHub login.
- When assignee lookup is needed, cache candidate results for the active session keyed by owner/repo (or owner) and query. Prefer `/memories/session/<owner>-<repo>-assignee-candidates.json` or `/memories/session/<owner>-assignee-candidates.json`; otherwise use `.tmp/issue-authoring-assignee-candidates-<owner>-<repo>.json`.
- If rate limits block optional label or assignee enrichment, ask whether to continue without them instead of looping retries.
### Step 7 — Mutate via MCP (ordered)
After explicit confirmation, execute MCP mutations in this order:
1. `mcp_github::issue_write` create/update with the full known payload (`title`, `body`, and include `labels`, `assignees`, `type` only when supported)
2. Optional single follow-up `mcp_github::issue_write` only when required fields were unknown in step 1 and become available later
3. `mcp_github::sub_issue_write` only when relationship/order changes are requested
4. `mcp_github::add_issue_comment` only when blocker/status notes are explicitly requested
If mutation fails due to missing MCP server/auth/config:
- explain the failure clearly
- guide user to setup steps in `references/mcp-server.md`
- retry after user confirms setup is complete
Rate-limit behavior:
- Detect and report rate-limit failures clearly (`API rate limit exceeded`, `secondary rate limit`, GraphQL quota exhaustion).
- Stop non-essential lookups and skip optional enrichments when rate limits are hit.
- Keep draft artifacts and return a safe retry plan instead of looping retries.
- Prefer MCP tools over ad hoc `gh api`/GraphQL retries when equivalent MCP capability exists.
- When using GraphQL fallback: mutations cost 5 secondary-limit points each (vs 1 for queries), so batch fields into a single mutation call and pause at least 1 second between mutation calls.
- Respect `retry-after` and `x-ratelimit-reset` headers before retrying any request.
`type` rule:
- Only use `type` if the repository has issue types configured.
- Use cached issue types per organization when available.
- Call `mcp_github::list_issue_types` only on cache miss or invalid cache.
- If issue types are not supported, omit `type` for the rest of the session.
### Step 8 — Validate relationships
Before linking:
-Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.