fusion-skill-authoring
Creates or modernizes repository skills with clear activation cues, purposeful support files, and practical review loops. USE FOR: creating a new skill, tightening an existing skill, improving discovery wording, and structuring references/assets/optional helper agents when they genuinely add value. DO NOT USE FOR: product-code changes, routine copy edits outside skills/, or documentation that should not become an installable skill.
What this skill does
# Create or Modernize Skills ## When to use Activate when creating a new skill under `skills/`, or when an existing skill needs a material authoring refresh. Typical triggers: - "Create a skill for ..." - "Scaffold `skills/<name>/SKILL.md`" - "Turn this workflow into a reusable skill" - "Improve this skill's metadata and activation cues" - "Make this skill easier to discover" - "Set up references/assets/helper agents for a skill" Implicit triggers: - Recurring task keeps requiring the same instructions or safety boundaries - Existing skill is too vague, too long, poorly routed, or missing structure - User wants a reusable workflow package, not a one-off prompt ## When not to use - Editing product or application code outside `skills/` - Tiny typo-only edits that don't need authoring workflow help - Requests better solved as docs, templates, or scripts without an installable skill - Large unrelated repo refactors - Destructive commands or hidden network automation ## Required inputs If required inputs are missing, ask concise targeted questions first. Use `assets/follow-up-questions.md` as the default question bank. ### Mandatory Collect before drafting: - Whether this is a new skill, update, or not a skill at all - Target repo path and intended skill directory - Base skill name in kebab-case before any prefix/namespace - Final skill name in kebab-case; default to `custom-<base-skill-name>` unless repo has different convention - One-sentence purpose and user outcome - Concrete activation cues: trigger phrases, domain keywords, anti-triggers - Expected output: files, commands, or decisions the skill produces - Safety boundaries and approval requirements ### Conditional Collect when relevant: - Naming prefix, namespace, or catalog convention - Skill category: capability uplift or workflow/encoded preference - Composition: standalone, orchestrator, or subordinate - Repository-specific ownership, lifecycle, or release policy - Orchestrator relationship: `metadata.orchestrator` for subordinates, `metadata.skills` for orchestrators - Target status (`active`, `experimental`, `deprecated`, `archived`) - `compatibility` text when skill has real environment constraints - MCP requirements (`metadata.mcp.required` / `metadata.mcp.suggested`) - Whether helper agents in `agents/` would sharpen scoping, review, or trigger tuning - Whether deterministic automation justifies a `scripts/` directory ### Optional Capture if useful: - `metadata.sponsor` as backup accountability if catalog uses it - Starter assets, checklists, examples, or templates - Related issue follow-up if an almost-match exists and should be improved instead of duplicated ### Metadata and structure constraints Validate before writing files: - `name`: 1-64 characters, lowercase letters/numbers/hyphens only, must match the folder name, no leading/trailing hyphen, no consecutive hyphens, no XML tags, and no reserved words - If the target repository has no prefix or namespace convention, default new skills to `custom-<base-skill-name>` - `description`: non-empty, <= 1024 chars, third-person, no XML tags, states both what the skill does and when to use it - Prefer a single-quoted YAML string with inline `USE FOR:` and `DO NOT USE FOR:` cues - Example: `description: 'Drafts release notes from validated repository context. USE FOR: release summaries, changelog preparation. DO NOT USE FOR: publishing releases or editing product code.'` - `metadata.version`: follow the target catalog's starting-version rule; if no local rule exists, `"0.0.0"` is a safe default for a new skill - `metadata.owner`: include only when the target catalog requires explicit ownership; use a stable GitHub identity or equivalent team handle - `metadata.status`: include only when the target catalog tracks lifecycle state; if used, keep it to `active`, `experimental`, `deprecated`, or `archived` - `metadata.tags`: keep tags relevant, lowercase, and kebab-case - `metadata`: use simple key/value metadata unless a relationship field explicitly needs a list or map - `license`: optional top-level field - `compatibility`: optional top-level field; only include it when the skill has real runtime, network, tool, or product constraints Repository-specific prefix rules, ownership/lifecycle requirements, release policy, and validation commands belong in repo-local instructions or catalog docs, not in the portable skill package. ## Instructions ### Step 1 — Decide whether this should be a skill at all 1. Check existing catalog first: - If an existing skill covers the request, recommend reuse or update instead of a duplicate - If a skill almost matches, recommend improving it or opening an issue 2. Don't scaffold if the request is better handled as: - plain repository documentation, - a template/checklist with no reusable agent behavior, - a standalone script with no skill-routing value, or - a tiny copy edit to an existing skill ### Step 2 — Define representative requests before drafting Capture at least three representative requests before writing long instructions: - the user request or trigger phrase, - the behavior the skill should produce, - the mistake or gap the skill must prevent. Use these as acceptance criteria. If you can't define realistic requests, the scope is underspecified or not reusable enough to become a skill. ### Step 3 — Classify the skill and choose the smallest valid structure Decide skill type: - `capability uplift`: packages domain knowledge, tools, or reference material - `workflow / encoded preference`: packages sequencing, review gates, style rules, or mutation order Decide composition: - `standalone`: no coordinating skill required - `orchestrator`: routes to companion skills, owns shared gates - `subordinate`: runs only under its orchestrator — document that dependency Choose minimum folder structure: - `SKILL.md` always - `references/` for long guidance, examples, tables, or platform-specific details - `assets/` for templates, checklists, sample outputs, and static files - `agents/` for specialized helper roles when runtime supports skill-local agents - `scripts/` only when deterministic automation materially improves safety or reliability Keep references one level deep. Don't create nested chains that force partial reads. ### Step 4 — Draft the minimum viable `SKILL.md` Write the smallest useful main document first: - concise frontmatter with strong discovery cues - `When to use` and `When not to use` - `Required inputs` - `Instructions` - `Expected output` - `Safety & constraints` Keep under 300 lines. Different runtimes have different context limits — files over 300 lines risk degradation on smaller runtimes and trigger CI warnings. Files over 500 lines fail CI. Move overflow to `references/` early. Prefer concise, specific instructions over background explanation. Assume the agent is capable; only add context it won't reliably infer. Set degree of freedom intentionally: - high freedom for context-dependent analysis or review - medium freedom when a preferred pattern exists but adaptation is expected - low freedom when workflow is fragile, safety-critical, or sequence-sensitive Include at least one concrete example in `SKILL.md` or link to one in `references/`. ### Step 5 — Add supporting files only when they reduce ambiguity Move long or specialized content out of `SKILL.md`: - `references/` for deep guidance, large examples, API/platform notes, or long checklists - `assets/` for templates and reusable artifacts - `agents/` for helper set when runtime supports skill-local agents and workflow benefits from scoped second opinion - `scripts/` for deterministic operations that should be executed instead of regenerated If you add scripts: - document dependencies and side effects, - validate inputs and fail with actionable errors, - keep network access explicit and justified, - never use remote-code execution patterns. If runtime ignores bundled helper agents
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.