generate-prep-doc-wdyd
Generate a detailed, personalized prep document for a specific upcoming conversation -- coffee chats, phone screens, or any interview-adjacent interaction
What this skill does
<references>
- references/prep-doc-structure.md
</references>
<purpose>
Generate a comprehensive, personalized prep document for a specific upcoming interaction with a company. Unlike `/prep-for-wdyd` which builds a general preparation plan, this skill creates a targeted document for a specific conversation -- incorporating the contact person, the backstory of how the interaction started, the user's arsenal evidence mapped to the company's values, concrete talking points, and questions to ask. Output is a markdown file saved to `~/.things/what-did-you-do/prep-docs/`.
</purpose>
<steps>
<step id="load-config" number="1">
<description>Load Configuration</description>
<load-config>
<action>Resolve the user's home directory.</action>
<command language="bash" output="home" tool="Bash">echo $HOME</command>
<constraint>Never pass `~` to the Read tool.</constraint>
<read path="<home>/.things/config.json" output="config" />
<if condition="config-missing">Tell the user: "Run `/things:setup-things` first." Then stop.</if>
<read path="<home>/.things/shared/professional-profile.json" output="profile" />
<read path="<home>/.things/what-did-you-do/preferences.json" output="preferences" />
<if condition="preferences-missing">Tell the user: "Run `/setup-wdyd` first." Then stop.</if>
<command language="bash" tool="Bash">mkdir -p <home>/.things/what-did-you-do/prep-docs</command>
</load-config>
</step>
<step id="load-company-profile" number="2">
<description>Load Company Profile</description>
<if condition="company-provided">
<read path="<home>/.things/shared/companies/<company>.yaml" output="company-profile" />
</if>
<if condition="no-company-specified">
<action>List available company profiles from `<home>/.things/shared/companies/`.</action>
<ask-user>
Which company is this interaction with?
<options>
- <dynamically list available company profiles>
- Custom -- I'll provide details
</options>
</ask-user>
</if>
<if condition="company-profile-missing">
<action>Search the web for the company's engineering culture, values, and interview process. Build an ad-hoc profile. Offer to save it to `<home>/.things/shared/companies/<company>.yaml` for future use.</action>
</if>
</step>
<step id="gather-context" number="3">
<description>Gather Interaction Context</description>
<if condition="contact-not-provided">
<ask-user>
Who are you meeting with? Include their name, title, and how they reached out if relevant.
(Free text -- e.g., "Tan Doan, Staff Software Engineer, reached out on LinkedIn after seeing my Bivvy post")
</ask-user>
</if>
<if condition="type-not-provided">
<ask-user>
What type of interaction is this?
<options>
- Coffee chat -- informal, exploratory conversation
- Phone screen -- recruiter or hiring manager initial screen
- Technical -- coding or system design focused
- Onsite -- formal interview round
- Bar raiser -- cross-functional deep dive
</options>
</ask-user>
</if>
<ask-user>
Is there any backstory I should know? Paste any relevant context -- LinkedIn messages, email threads, job listings, referral details, etc.
(Free text -- or "no additional context")
</ask-user>
<if condition="role-not-provided-and-not-in-context">
<ask-user>
What role is this for?
(Free text -- e.g., "Mid-Senior Infra/Platform Engineer")
</ask-user>
</if>
<action>Extract from the backstory context:
- How the interaction originated (inbound vs outbound, referral, organic)
- What the contact already knows about the user
- Any concerns or gaps already surfaced
- Any shared interests or connection points
- The user's leverage and position in the process
</action>
</step>
<step id="load-arsenal" number="4">
<description>Load Arsenal and Session History</description>
<action>Read all arsenal files from `<home>/.things/i-did-a-thing/arsenal/`.</action>
<action>Read any existing session history from `<home>/.things/what-did-you-do/sessions/`.</action>
<action>Check for an existing prep plan for this company: `<home>/.things/what-did-you-do/<company>-prep-plan.md`.</action>
</step>
<step id="analyze-position" number="5">
<description>Analyze the User's Position</description>
<action>Based on the backstory and context, determine:</action>
<substep name="leverage-assessment">
<description>Assess the user's leverage in this interaction.</description>
<rubric>
- **Strong**: Contact reached out to them, their work is already validated, they have a champion inside
- **Neutral**: Mutual connection, referral, or applied and got a callback
- **Building**: Cold application, no prior relationship
</rubric>
</substep>
<substep name="known-concerns">
<description>Identify any concerns or gaps already surfaced in prior communication.</description>
<action>For each concern, prepare a concrete framing strategy using arsenal evidence and the company's values.</action>
</substep>
<substep name="shared-ground">
<description>Identify shared interests, tools, problems, or experiences between the user and the contact.</description>
</substep>
</step>
<step id="map-arsenal-to-company" number="6">
<description>Map Arsenal to Company Values and Role</description>
<for-each item="value" source="company-values">
<substep name="find-evidence">
<description>Search arsenal for entries that demonstrate this value's interview signals.</description>
</substep>
<substep name="classify">
<description>Classify coverage as Strong, Partial, or Gap.</description>
</substep>
</for-each>
<action>Select the top 3-4 arsenal stories most relevant to this specific interaction, considering:
- The contact's role and what they'd care about
- The interaction type (casual vs formal)
- Any concerns already raised
- Shared interests identified in the backstory
</action>
<constraint>When matching, consider which evidence types are most relevant:
- Values about learning, adaptability, resilience -> `lesson` entries
- Values about technical depth, expertise -> `expertise` entries
- Values about judgment, ownership -> `decision` entries
- Values about influence, leadership, mentorship -> `influence` entries
- Values about vision, innovation, curiosity -> `insight` entries
- Values about delivery, results, bias for action -> `accomplishment` entries
</constraint>
</step>
<step id="build-prep-doc" number="7">
<description>Build the Prep Document</description>
<action>Construct the full prep document following the structure in `references/prep-doc-structure.md`.</action>
<constraint>The tone and depth should match the interaction type:
- **Coffee chat**: Conversational, peer-to-peer framing. Emphasize shared interests, natural conversation flow, and mutual evaluation. No STAR-format drilling.
- **Phone screen**: Concise talking points, elevator pitch ready, motivational framing. Why this company, why this role.
- **Technical**: Arsenal stories focused on system design tradeoffs, architecture decisions, technical depth. Include concrete technical details.
- **Onsite**: Full behavioral prep with value mapping, multiple stories per value, anti-pattern awareness.
- **Bar raiser**: Cross-functional depth, judgment under ambiguity, long-term thinking emphasis.
</constraint>
<constraint>Every section must be actionable. No filler. The user should be able to read this 30 minutes before the interaction and feel prepared.</constraint>
<constraint>Questions to ask should be specific to this interaction -- not generic intervRelated in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.