git-issue
Process GitHub issues end-to-end with TDD and parallel work. Use when asked to work on an issue, fix issue #N, pick issues to tackle, or batch-process several.
What this skill does
## When to Use This Skill
| Use this skill when... | Use X instead when... |
|------------------------|----------------------|
| Implementing a fix for one or more open issues with TDD and PR creation | Performing administrative ops (transfer, pin, lock, bulk edit) on issues (`/git:issue-manage`) |
| Picking issues from the backlog to work on, optionally in parallel | Periodically grooming open issues and PRs to close stale or completed ones (`/git:triage`) |
| Going from an issue number to a merged-ready PR end-to-end | Hierarchical sub-issue planning and tracking (`/git:issue-hierarchy`) |
## Context
- Git remotes: !`git remote -v`
- Current branch: !`git branch --show-current`
- Working tree clean: !`git status --porcelain=v2`
Open issues, open PRs, and available labels are fetched during execution (requires a configured git remote).
## Parameters
Parse these parameters from the command:
| Parameter | Description |
|-----------|-------------|
| `<issue-numbers...>` | One or more issue numbers to process |
| `--auto` | Claude selects and prioritizes issues |
| `--filter <label>` | Filter issues by label |
| `--limit <n>` | Maximum number of issues to process |
| `--parallel` | Process parallel groups simultaneously using Task agents |
| `--labels <label1,label2>` | Apply labels to created PRs (defaults to issue's labels) |
## Your Task
Process GitHub issues using a TDD workflow with the **main-branch development pattern**.
---
## Mode Detection
### No Arguments → Interactive Mode
Use AskUserQuestion to prompt:
```yaml
questions:
- header: "Issues"
question: "How would you like to select issues to work on?"
options:
- label: "Let me choose specific issues"
description: "Show issue list for manual selection"
- label: "Claude decides priority"
description: "Analyze issues and recommend which to tackle"
- label: "Filter by label"
description: "Select issues with a specific label"
```
**For "Let me choose specific issues":**
1. Fetch: `gh issue list --state open --json number,title,labels,assignees`
2. Present checkboxes with `multiSelect: true`
**For "Claude decides priority":**
- Analyze all open issues
- Score by clarity, scope, dependencies
- Present top recommendations
**For "Filter by label":**
- Present label selection from available labels
- Then show matching issues for selection
### Single Issue (`/git:issue 123`)
Process directly with standard TDD workflow.
### Multiple Issues (`/git:issue 123 456 789`)
1. Analyze all issues for conflicts and parallelization
2. Group by dependencies
3. Process sequentially or spawn parallel agents
### Auto Mode (`/git:issue --auto`)
1. Fetch all open issues
2. Score and prioritize
3. Present recommendations for approval
4. Process approved issues
---
## Issue Analysis Engine
Before processing multiple issues, analyze for:
### Blocker Check (run first)
Before sequencing or scoring, ask GitHub which issues are blocked by other
open work via the native dependencies API:
```bash
gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/issues/$N/dependencies/blocked_by \
--jq '.[] | select(.state == "open") | .number'
```
If the list is non-empty:
1. Report the open blockers inline: `#N is blocked by #X, #Y`.
2. Use AskUserQuestion to offer: work on a blocker first, skip this issue,
or proceed anyway (only appropriate if the blocker is stale or
mis-linked).
3. Never silently work on a blocked issue — the "Blocked" badge exists so
humans don't ship work out of order.
Also fetch `dependencies/blocking` to understand downstream impact —
finishing an issue that blocks others may be higher leverage than finishing
an independent issue of the same size.
### Conflict Detection
Identify issues that cannot be worked on simultaneously:
| Conflict Type | Detection Method |
|---------------|------------------|
| File overlap | Issues referencing same files/components |
| Logical conflicts | Opposing requirements (add vs remove) |
| Dependency chains | `dependencies/blocked_by` returns an open issue |
| Sub-issue ordering | Parent's `sub_issues` not yet complete |
### Confidence Scoring
Score each issue's implementability:
| Factor | Weight | Criteria |
|--------|--------|----------|
| Clear requirements | 30% | Has acceptance criteria, specific details |
| Scope definition | 25% | Bounded scope, identifiable files |
| No conflicts | 20% | No overlapping work with other issues |
| Test strategy clear | 15% | TDD approach is obvious |
| Labels/priority | 10% | Has priority labels, milestone |
**Threshold: 70%**
If confidence < 70%, prompt user:
```yaml
questions:
- header: "Low confidence"
question: "Issue #N has unclear requirements. How should I proceed?"
options:
- label: "Attempt anyway"
description: "Make best-effort attempt based on available info"
- label: "Ask for clarification"
description: "Request more details on the issue"
- label: "Skip this issue"
description: "Move to next issue in queue"
```
### Parallel Work Detection
Identify issues that can be worked simultaneously:
**Parallelizable when:**
- Different files/components
- Neither issue appears in the other's `dependencies/blocked_by`
- Neither is a sub-issue of the other
- Independent test suites
- No logical conflicts
**Output format:**
```
Parallel Groups:
Group 1: #123, #125 (both touch auth module - sequential)
Group 2: #124 (standalone - can run in parallel)
Group 3: #126, #127 (both touch UI - sequential)
Recommended: Run Groups 1, 2, 3 in parallel (3 agents)
```
---
## Execution Workflow
### Step 1: Prepare Working Directory
1. **Ensure clean working directory** (commit or stash if needed)
2. **Switch to main and pull latest**: `git switch main && git pull`
### Step 2: For Each Issue (or Parallel Group)
#### Standard Flow (Sequential or Single Issue)
1. **Fetch issue details**: `gh issue view $N --json title,body,state,assignees,labels`
2. **Capture issue labels** for later PR creation
3. **Identify requirements** and acceptance criteria
4. **Plan the implementation** approach
#### TDD Workflow
1. **RED phase**: Write failing tests first
- Create test file if needed
- Write tests that define expected behavior
- Run tests to verify they fail
2. **GREEN phase**: Implement fix
- Write minimal code to make tests pass
- Run tests to verify they pass
3. **REFACTOR phase**: Improve code quality
- Clean up implementation
- Ensure tests still pass
#### Commit and Push
1. **Stage changes**: `git add -u` and `git add <new-files>`
2. **Run pre-commit** if configured
3. **Commit on main** with message format:
```
<type>: <description>
<optional body explaining the change>
Fixes #N
```
4. **Push to remote issue branch**: `git push origin main:fix/issue-$N`
#### Create PR
Use `mcp__github__create_pull_request` with:
- `head`: `fix/issue-$N`
- `base`: `main`
- `title`: From issue title with `fix:` prefix
- `body`: Include `Fixes #$N` to auto-link
After PR creation, apply labels:
```bash
gh pr edit <pr-number> --add-label "<labels>"
```
### Step 3: Parallel Execution (--parallel flag)
When `--parallel` is specified:
1. Group issues by dependencies (from analysis)
2. For each parallel group, spawn a Task agent:
```
Agent tool with subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Process issue #N with TDD workflow..."
```
3. Wait for all agents to complete
4. Consolidate results
---
## Commit Message Format
**Issue reference at BOTTOM:**
```
<type>: <description>
<optional body explaining the change>
Fixes #123
```
**Multiple issues in single commit:**
```
fix: resolve authentication and session handling
- Add token refresh logic
- Fix session timeout detection
Fixes #123
Fixes #125
```
---
## Main-Branch Development Pattern
```bash
# All work stays on main
git switch main && git pull
# ... make changes, commit on main ...
git push origin main:fix/issue-$N # Push to remote featurRelated in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.