github-workflow-automation
Patterns for automating GitHub workflows with AI assistance, inspired by [Gemini CLI](https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli) and modern DevOps practices.
What this skill does
# ๐ง GitHub Workflow Automation
> Patterns for automating GitHub workflows with AI assistance, inspired by [Gemini CLI](https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli) and modern DevOps practices.
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Automating PR reviews with AI
- Setting up issue triage automation
- Creating GitHub Actions workflows
- Integrating AI into CI/CD pipelines
- Automating Git operations (rebases, cherry-picks)
---
## 1. Automated PR Review
### 1.1 PR Review Action
```yaml
# .github/workflows/ai-review.yml
name: AI Code Review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
jobs:
review:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Get changed files
id: changed
run: |
files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
echo "files<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: Get diff
id: diff
run: |
diff=$(git diff origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
echo "diff<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "$diff" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: AI Review
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const { Anthropic } = require('@anthropic-ai/sdk');
const client = new Anthropic({ apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY });
const response = await client.messages.create({
model: "claude-3-sonnet-20240229",
max_tokens: 4096,
messages: [{
role: "user",
content: `Review this PR diff and provide feedback:
Changed files: ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}
Diff:
${{ steps.diff.outputs.diff }}
Provide:
1. Summary of changes
2. Potential issues or bugs
3. Suggestions for improvement
4. Security concerns if any
Format as GitHub markdown.`
}]
});
await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
pull_number: context.issue.number,
body: response.content[0].text,
event: 'COMMENT'
});
env:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
```
### 1.2 Review Comment Patterns
````markdown
# AI Review Structure
## ๐ Summary
Brief description of what this PR does.
## โ
What looks good
- Well-structured code
- Good test coverage
- Clear naming conventions
## โ ๏ธ Potential Issues
1. **Line 42**: Possible null pointer exception
```javascript
// Current
user.profile.name;
// Suggested
user?.profile?.name ?? "Unknown";
```
````
2. **Line 78**: Consider error handling
```javascript
// Add try-catch or .catch()
```
## ๐ก Suggestions
- Consider extracting the validation logic into a separate function
- Add JSDoc comments for public methods
## ๐ Security Notes
- No sensitive data exposure detected
- API key handling looks correct
````
### 1.3 Focused Reviews
```yaml
# Review only specific file types
- name: Filter code files
run: |
files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD | \
grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py|go)$' || true)
echo "code_files=$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
# Review with context
- name: AI Review with context
run: |
# Include relevant context files
context=""
for file in ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}; do
if [[ -f "$file" ]]; then
context+="=== $file ===\n$(cat $file)\n\n"
fi
done
# Send to AI with full file context
````
---
## 2. Issue Triage Automation
### 2.1 Auto-label Issues
```yaml
# .github/workflows/issue-triage.yml
name: Issue Triage
on:
issues:
types: [opened]
jobs:
triage:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
issues: write
steps:
- name: Analyze issue
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const issue = context.payload.issue;
// Call AI to analyze
const analysis = await analyzeIssue(issue.title, issue.body);
// Apply labels
const labels = [];
if (analysis.type === 'bug') {
labels.push('bug');
if (analysis.severity === 'high') labels.push('priority: high');
} else if (analysis.type === 'feature') {
labels.push('enhancement');
} else if (analysis.type === 'question') {
labels.push('question');
}
if (analysis.area) {
labels.push(`area: ${analysis.area}`);
}
await github.rest.issues.addLabels({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue.number,
labels: labels
});
// Add initial response
if (analysis.type === 'bug' && !analysis.hasReproSteps) {
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue.number,
body: `Thanks for reporting this issue!
To help us investigate, could you please provide:
- Steps to reproduce the issue
- Expected behavior
- Actual behavior
- Environment (OS, version, etc.)
This will help us resolve your issue faster. ๐`
});
}
```
### 2.2 Issue Analysis Prompt
```typescript
const TRIAGE_PROMPT = `
Analyze this GitHub issue and classify it:
Title: {title}
Body: {body}
Return JSON with:
{
"type": "bug" | "feature" | "question" | "docs" | "other",
"severity": "low" | "medium" | "high" | "critical",
"area": "frontend" | "backend" | "api" | "docs" | "ci" | "other",
"summary": "one-line summary",
"hasReproSteps": boolean,
"isFirstContribution": boolean,
"suggestedLabels": ["label1", "label2"],
"suggestedAssignees": ["username"] // based on area expertise
}
`;
```
### 2.3 Stale Issue Management
```yaml
# .github/workflows/stale.yml
name: Manage Stale Issues
on:
schedule:
- cron: "0 0 * * *" # Daily
jobs:
stale:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/stale@v9
with:
stale-issue-message: |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had
recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
If this issue is still relevant:
- Add a comment with an update
- Remove the `stale` label
Thank you for your contributions! ๐
stale-pr-message: |
This PR has been automatically marked as stale. Please update it or it
will be closed in 14 days.
days-before-stale: 60
days-before-close: 14
stale-issue-label: "stale"
stale-pr-label: "stale"
exempt-issue-labels: "pinned,security,in-progress"
exempt-pr-labels: "pinned,security"
```
---
## 3. CI/CD Integration
### 3.1 Smart Test Selection
```yaml
# .github/workflows/smart-tests.yml
name: Smart Test Selection
on:
pull_request:
jobs:
analyze:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
outputs:
test_suites: ${{ steps.analyze.outputs.suites }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Analyze changes
id: analyze
run: |
# Get changed files
changed=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
# Determine which test suitesRelated in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts โ single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score โฅ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.