go-functional-options
Use when designing a Go constructor or factory function with optional configuration — especially with 3+ optional parameters or extensible APIs. Also use when building a New* function that takes many settings, even if they don't mention "functional options" by name. Does not cover general function design (see go-functions).
What this skill does
# Functional Options Pattern
Functional options is a pattern where you declare an opaque `Option` type that records information in an internal struct. The constructor accepts a variadic number of these options and applies them to configure the result.
## When to Use
Use functional options when:
- **3+ optional arguments** on constructors or public APIs
- **Extensible APIs** that may gain new options over time
- **Clean caller experience** is important (no need to pass defaults)
## The Pattern
### Core Components
1. **Unexported `options` struct** - holds all configuration
2. **Exported `Option` interface** - with unexported `apply` method
3. **Option types** - implement the interface
4. **`With*` constructors** - create options
### Option Interface
```go
type Option interface {
apply(*options)
}
```
The unexported `apply` method ensures only options from this package can be used.
## Complete Implementation
```go
package db
import "go.uber.org/zap"
// options holds all configuration for opening a connection.
type options struct {
cache bool
logger *zap.Logger
}
// Option configures how we open the connection.
type Option interface {
apply(*options)
}
// cacheOption implements Option for cache setting (simple type alias).
type cacheOption bool
func (c cacheOption) apply(opts *options) {
opts.cache = bool(c)
}
// WithCache enables or disables caching.
func WithCache(c bool) Option {
return cacheOption(c)
}
// loggerOption implements Option for logger setting (struct for pointers).
type loggerOption struct {
Log *zap.Logger
}
func (l loggerOption) apply(opts *options) {
opts.logger = l.Log
}
// WithLogger sets the logger for the connection.
func WithLogger(log *zap.Logger) Option {
return loggerOption{Log: log}
}
// Open creates a connection.
func Open(addr string, opts ...Option) (*Connection, error) {
// Start with defaults
options := options{
cache: defaultCache,
logger: zap.NewNop(),
}
// Apply all provided options
for _, o := range opts {
o.apply(&options)
}
// Use options.cache and options.logger...
return &Connection{}, nil
}
```
## Usage Examples
### Without Functional Options (Bad)
```go
// Caller must always provide all parameters, even defaults
db.Open(addr, db.DefaultCache, zap.NewNop())
db.Open(addr, db.DefaultCache, log)
db.Open(addr, false /* cache */, zap.NewNop())
db.Open(addr, false /* cache */, log)
```
### With Functional Options (Good)
```go
// Only provide options when needed
db.Open(addr)
db.Open(addr, db.WithLogger(log))
db.Open(addr, db.WithCache(false))
db.Open(
addr,
db.WithCache(false),
db.WithLogger(log),
)
```
## Comparison: Functional Options vs Config Struct
| Aspect | Functional Options | Config Struct |
|--------|-------------------|---------------|
| **Extensibility** | Add new `With*` functions | Add new fields (may break) |
| **Defaults** | Built into constructor | Zero values or separate defaults |
| **Caller experience** | Only specify what differs | Must construct entire struct |
| **Testability** | Options are comparable | Struct comparison |
| **Complexity** | More boilerplate | Simpler setup |
**Prefer Config Struct when**: Fewer than 3 options, options rarely change, all options usually specified together, or internal APIs only.
> Read [references/OPTIONS-VS-STRUCTS.md](references/OPTIONS-VS-STRUCTS.md) when deciding between functional options and config structs, designing a config struct API with proper defaults, or evaluating the hybrid approach for complex constructors.
## Why Not Closures?
An alternative implementation uses closures:
```go
// Closure approach (not recommended)
type Option func(*options)
func WithCache(c bool) Option {
return func(o *options) { o.cache = c }
}
```
The interface approach is preferred because:
1. **Testability** - Options can be compared in tests and mocks
2. **Debuggability** - Options can implement `fmt.Stringer`
3. **Flexibility** - Options can implement additional interfaces
4. **Visibility** - Option types are visible in documentation
## Quick Reference
```go
// 1. Unexported options struct with defaults
type options struct {
field1 Type1
field2 Type2
}
// 2. Exported Option interface, unexported method
type Option interface {
apply(*options)
}
// 3. Option type + apply + With* constructor
type field1Option Type1
func (o field1Option) apply(opts *options) { opts.field1 = Type1(o) }
func WithField1(v Type1) Option { return field1Option(v) }
// 4. Constructor applies options over defaults
func New(required string, opts ...Option) (*Thing, error) {
o := options{field1: defaultField1, field2: defaultField2}
for _, opt := range opts {
opt.apply(&o)
}
// ...
}
```
### Checklist
- [ ] `options` struct is unexported
- [ ] `Option` interface has unexported `apply` method
- [ ] Each option has a `With*` constructor
- [ ] Defaults are set before applying options
- [ ] Required parameters are separate from `...Option`
## Related Skills
- **Interface design**: See [go-interfaces](../go-interfaces/SKILL.md) when designing the `Option` interface or choosing between interface and closure approaches
- **Naming conventions**: See [go-naming](../go-naming/SKILL.md) when naming `With*` constructors, option types, or the unexported options struct
- **Function design**: See [go-functions](../go-functions/SKILL.md) when organizing constructors within a file or formatting variadic signatures
- **Documentation**: See [go-documentation](../go-documentation/SKILL.md) when documenting `Option` types, `With*` functions, or constructor behavior
### External Resources
- [Self-referential functions and the design of options](https://commandcenter.blogspot.com/2014/01/self-referential-functions-and-design.html) - Rob Pike
- [Functional options for friendly APIs](https://dave.cheney.net/2014/10/17/functional-options-for-friendly-apis) - Dave Cheney
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.