grant-proposal-builder
Nonprofit and research grant proposal assembly with structured sections, budget templates, and evaluation alignment. Use when writing grant proposals, funding applications, or research funding requests.
What this skill does
# Grant Proposal Builder
Comprehensive frameworks for developing competitive grant proposals across government, foundation, corporate, and research funding contexts.
## Grant Proposal Structure
### Universal Proposal Sections
```
STANDARD STRUCTURE:
1. COVER PAGE / TITLE PAGE
- Project title (clear, compelling, concise)
- Applicant organization name and address
- Principal Investigator / Project Director
- Requested amount and project period
- Funder program name and deadline
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / ABSTRACT (1 page)
- Problem statement (2-3 sentences)
- Proposed solution (2-3 sentences)
- Goals and expected outcomes (2-3 sentences)
- Budget summary (1 sentence)
- Organization qualifications (1-2 sentences)
3. STATEMENT OF NEED (2-4 pages)
- Problem definition with data
- Population affected
- Geographic scope
- Consequences of inaction
- Gap in current solutions
4. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (1-2 pages)
- Goal statements (broad, long-term)
- SMART objectives (specific, measurable)
- Alignment with funder priorities
5. METHODOLOGY / PROJECT DESIGN (5-10 pages)
- Approach and activities
- Timeline and milestones
- Staffing and roles
- Partnerships and collaborations
- Innovation and evidence base
6. EVALUATION PLAN (2-4 pages)
- Process evaluation design
- Outcome evaluation design
- Data collection methods
- Analysis approach
- Reporting schedule
7. BUDGET AND BUDGET NARRATIVE (2-5 pages)
- Line-item budget
- Budget justification narrative
- Matching/cost-share (if required)
8. SUSTAINABILITY PLAN (1-2 pages)
- Post-grant funding strategy
- Institutional commitment
- Revenue diversification
9. ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY (1-2 pages)
- Mission and history
- Relevant experience
- Key staff qualifications
- Past performance
10. APPENDICES
- Letters of support
- Staff CVs/resumes
- Organizational chart
- Tax-exempt documentation
- Data tables and supplementary materials
```
## Needs Assessment Methodology
### Building a Compelling Case
```
NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMPONENTS:
1. QUANTIFY THE PROBLEM
- Use local, state, and national data
- Cite authoritative sources (CDC, Census, WHO, peer-reviewed)
- Show trends (is the problem growing?)
- Compare to benchmarks or averages
Example: "In Jefferson County, 34% of children under 5 live in
food-insecure households, compared to the state average of 19%
and national average of 16% (USDA, 2024)."
2. DEFINE THE TARGET POPULATION
- Demographics (age, gender, race/ethnicity, income)
- Geographic location
- Size of population affected
- Specific vulnerabilities or barriers
3. DOCUMENT THE GAP
- What services/solutions currently exist?
- Where do they fall short?
- What populations are underserved?
- What evidence supports the proposed approach?
4. ESTABLISH URGENCY
- Consequences of inaction
- Time-sensitive factors
- Tipping points or windows of opportunity
- Cost of not acting vs. cost of intervention
```
### Data Sources for Needs Statements
| Data Type | Sources | Strength |
|-----------|---------|----------|
| **Demographic** | US Census, ACS, BLS | Authoritative, granular |
| **Health** | CDC WONDER, BRFSS, NHANES | National benchmarks |
| **Education** | NCES, state report cards | School/district level |
| **Economic** | BLS, BEA, FRED | Employment, income data |
| **Community** | Community needs assessments | Local relevance |
| **Qualitative** | Focus groups, interviews, surveys | Lived experience |
| **Organizational** | Internal program data | Demonstrates capacity |
## Logic Model / Theory of Change
### Logic Model Template
```
LOGIC MODEL:
INPUTS ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS SHORT-TERM LONG-TERM
(Resources) (What you do) (Products) OUTCOMES OUTCOMES
(1-3 years) (3-5+ years)
----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -----------
Funding Job training # trained Increased Reduced
Staff workshops # workshops employment poverty rate
Volunteers Case management # served rate
Partners Mentoring # mentor Higher Improved
Facilities Job placement matches income community
Curriculum Follow-up # placed economic
support Improved health
job retention
ASSUMPTIONS:
- Target population will engage in programming
- Local employers will participate in placement
- Participants have baseline qualifications
- Economic conditions remain stable
EXTERNAL FACTORS:
- Labor market conditions
- Policy/regulatory changes
- Community support
- Competing programs
```
### Theory of Change Narrative
```
TEMPLATE:
IF we provide [ACTIVITIES] to [TARGET POPULATION],
THEN [SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES] will occur,
BECAUSE [EVIDENCE/MECHANISM],
WHICH WILL LEAD TO [LONG-TERM OUTCOMES].
EXAMPLE:
"If we provide intensive digital literacy training combined with
personalized job coaching to 200 unemployed adults in rural
Appalachia, then participants will develop marketable technology
skills and secure employment within 6 months, because research
demonstrates that combined skills training and individualized
support produces employment rates 40% higher than training alone
(Smith et al., 2023), which will lead to increased household
income and reduced regional poverty over 3-5 years."
```
## SMART Objectives
### Writing SMART Objectives
| Component | Definition | Test Question |
|-----------|-----------|---------------|
| **Specific** | Clearly defined and unambiguous | What exactly will change? For whom? |
| **Measurable** | Quantifiable indicator of success | How will you know it was achieved? |
| **Achievable** | Realistic given resources and context | Can this actually be accomplished? |
| **Relevant** | Aligned with needs and funder priorities | Does this address the stated need? |
| **Time-bound** | Clear deadline or timeframe | By when will this be achieved? |
### Objective Examples
```
WEAK OBJECTIVE:
"Improve health outcomes for community members."
STRONG OBJECTIVE:
"By September 30, 2027, 75% of the 200 enrolled participants
will demonstrate a reduction in systolic blood pressure of at
least 10 mmHg, as measured by quarterly clinical assessments."
GOAL vs OBJECTIVE:
Goal: Reduce food insecurity in Jefferson County
Objective 1: By Month 12, establish 3 new community food
pantries serving 500 households per month
Objective 2: By Month 18, 80% of enrolled families will report
increased access to fresh produce (pre/post survey)
Objective 3: By Month 24, reduce the percentage of food-insecure
children in target ZIP codes from 34% to 25%
```
## Budget Development
### Budget Template
```
BUDGET CATEGORIES:
A. PERSONNEL
Position | FTE | Annual Salary | Grant Request | Match
Project Director | 1.0 | $75,000 | $75,000 | $0
Program Manager | 1.0 | $55,000 | $55,000 | $0
Case Workers (2) | 2.0 | $42,000 each | $84,000 | $0
Evaluator | 0.25 | $80,000 | $20,000 | $0
Admin Assistant | 0.5 | $35,000 | $0 | $17,500
SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL | $234,000 | $17,500
B. FRINGE BENEFITS (rate: 28%)
SUBTOTAL FRINGE | $65,520 | $4,900
C. TRAVEL
Local mileage (staff) | $4,800 | $0
Conference travel (2 staff x 1 conf) | $4,000 | $0
SUBTOTAL TRAVEL | $8,800 | $0
D. EQUIPMENT (>$5,000 per unit)
None | $0 Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.